- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This image of Kyle Rittenhouse is making the rounds on reddit
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:23 pm to cwill
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:23 pm to cwill
There is nothing weird about the kid cwill. He was there with several other individuals, in a good natured and ill fated attempt to protect property at risk. We used to care about each other in our communities like that. You remember that time.
Joseph "Jo Jo" Rosenbaum was acting like an anarchist/sociopath in the brief video we have of him. And he took exception to the fact that someone actually was standing up to him and his fellow rioters. And when he had an opportunity to pick on the weakest of them he did and chased him to the corner of 63rd Street and Sheridan Road. To Bert & Rudy's Auto Service. And he tried to disarm an 17 year old teenager. And he lost his life.
And the only person at fault is him.
Joseph "Jo Jo" Rosenbaum was acting like an anarchist/sociopath in the brief video we have of him. And he took exception to the fact that someone actually was standing up to him and his fellow rioters. And when he had an opportunity to pick on the weakest of them he did and chased him to the corner of 63rd Street and Sheridan Road. To Bert & Rudy's Auto Service. And he tried to disarm an 17 year old teenager. And he lost his life.
And the only person at fault is him.
1
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:24 pm to lil 7thward
Yep
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:24 pm to Vacherie Saint
his "points" are really dumb tbh. the whole "showing" your weapon post was hilarious. he's literally carrying a rifle.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:25 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
And the only person at fault is him.
choices have consequences. he chose poorly.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:26 pm to monsterballads
quote:
choices have consequences. he chose poorly.
You could say he....fricked around and found out.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:26 pm to monsterballads
quote:
a civilian could also have an automatic rifle but there's a ton of paperwork to do so legally.
And a hefty fee
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:27 pm to Centinel
quote:
Do you think Soldiers carry their rifles differently from citizens?
What does a soldier have to do with a 17 year old kid walking around with a rifle?
I get that some or most of you can't argue your point without trying to divert from the topic.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:30 pm to graves1
quote:
So once again, which laws can we ignore?
Inciting a riot, arson, assault, attempted murder, looting, breaking a curfew, etc.
Good enough?
This post was edited on 8/28/20 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:32 pm to graves1
quote:
There was a confrontation before he shot the first guy then he ran.
And he fled from that confrontation.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:33 pm to graves1
Ok smart arse. How do YOU "not show" your rifles until you are ready to shoot in a self defense situation?
Do you ask pedomidget to wait until you can get it out of the car first?
Do you ask pedomidget to wait until you can get it out of the car first?
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:35 pm to graves1
quote:
What does a soldier have to do with a 17 year old kid walking around with a rifle?
That 17 year old, is within his constitutional rights. Kids much younger than that have rifles around here, and you will see them walking down the road with them, all the time. We need all decent people, to be carrying all the time. That way they can just take out the criminal trash, whenever needed. Police wouldn't be needed.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:41 pm to graves1
quote:Apparently, you have the vocabulary of a 4 year old also.
I've been to Auburn and Opelika. It's not normal there either.
"Normal" doesn't = "common".
Something can be perfectly normal and not be terribly common.
Is there ANYTHING you aren't ignorant on?
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:44 pm to ShortyRob
He's comparing Opelika on a random Tuesday to Kenosha in the throes of a violent leftist riot.
So no. There's NOTHING he isn't ignorant on. Likely a college or near college age leftist who thinks he has it all figured out.
So no. There's NOTHING he isn't ignorant on. Likely a college or near college age leftist who thinks he has it all figured out.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:45 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
It was self defense, but it is certainly true that if the board didn't agree with his "side", they would be harping on the lawbreaking he did - potentially even throwing in some "play stupid games" remarks.
Bull shite
You show me a bunch of conservatives going into neighborhoods torching shite, assaulting random people and creating mayhem simply because they're mad about some criminal white guy getting shot and then, show me some black liberal there to try and prevent them from doing so, and you'll have me supporting the defender.
And, before anyone gets cute about it. Don't confuse who STARTED this shite.
AT THIS point, I'm fricking all good with a band of conservative seeking out these liberal types and mowing them down.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:45 pm to graves1
quote:
There was a confrontation before he shot the first guy then he ran.
There is no absolutely proof of this. Even if they do find proof of any confrontation between the two, our patriot was retreating from the situation, running in fact, and the guy was chasing after him and throwing something at him. He caught up wit Rittenhouse and tried to grab his rifle. Rittenhouse had every right to not only keep that moron from taking his gun but to also protect himself.
You seriously need to educate yourself on our self defense laws.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:47 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Yep.
He's comparing Opelika on a random Tuesday to Kenosha in the throes of a violent leftist riot.
So no. There's NOTHING he isn't ignorant on. Likely a college or near college age leftist who thinks he has it all figured out.
The common confusing of "I don't see it a bunch" with "not normal".
I also don't see a whole lot of football games breaking out in open grassy fields these days(like was common when I was young) - But, it's still normal.
It is perfectly normal to open carry when there are violent thugs out burning shite and assaulting people.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:47 pm to graves1
quote:
Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense. A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack.
One of the dumber things I’ve seen posted here.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:48 pm to graves1
quote:
What does a soldier have to do with a 17 year old kid walking around with a rifle?
What is the modern correct way to carry a rifle?
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:49 pm to the808bass
Hell. Up until recently, I pretty much never kept my weapon in my car. Certainly not every day.
Now? It's there every fricking minute I'm in the car and it's concealed on me otherwise.
10 years ago, for me, that would have been "abnormal"
Today, it's not only normal...........it's really the only sane thing to do.
Now? It's there every fricking minute I'm in the car and it's concealed on me otherwise.
10 years ago, for me, that would have been "abnormal"
Today, it's not only normal...........it's really the only sane thing to do.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 3:50 pm to graves1
quote:In this case, they both carry their weapons properly.
What does a soldier have to do with a 17 year old kid walking around with a rifle?
Ya know. Since you were such an "expert" on firearms training
Page 13 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News