- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:41 am to GRTiger
quote:
Probably the work requirements.
In the states that have already implemented work requirements, thousands of enrollees were erroneously kicked off Medicaid due to paperwork processing delays or other human errors stemming from the increased bureaucracy.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:41 am to VOR
quote:
You know very well that is just one person and does not represent the average Medicaid recipient.
Oh yes it does. People who are incapable of holding down a job, or refuse to, can't ponder how to have safe sex, get a diagnosis for any little thing so they have an excuse?
That IS the average recipient. The ideal in your head of the hard working American who just can't make enough money to support is family, but tries hard. Has safe sex. Stays as healthy as he can and puts his family first by working absolutely as hard a he can....
That's the rare one.
You know why? Because people who do that will eventually pull themselves out in this country.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:43 am to 4cubbies
quote:
stemming from the increased bureaucracy.
Yea well the government fricks shite up a lot. I believe you're on board with punishing them by letting them run the entire medical system, no?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:43 am to Freauxzen
quote:
can't ponder how to have safe sex
The pill is $7 a month at Walmart by Rx.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:44 am to Freauxzen
VOR agrees this person shouldnt be on medicaid. Lets all take the W and congratulate VOR for his rational post and welcome many more in the future!
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:45 am to LemmyLives
quote:
The pill is $7 a month at Walmart by Rx.
Its a carcinogen. I wonder why men aren't expected to have safe sex OR provide for the offspring they produce. Y'all only ever want to shite on women for having kids.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:46 am to VOR
quote:
just can’t help myself with some of the nonsense I see on the board.
Typical liberal projection.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:46 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Have you tried Googling anything before?
Rich coming from you.
He provided a specific number. I wanted what he used.
The link you provided doesn't match his figure, so thanks for nothing as usual.
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 9:47 am
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:47 am to GRTiger
quote:
Yea well the government fricks shite up a lot. I believe you're on board with punishing them by letting them run the entire medical system, no?
We should continue running things the way you prefer, which is the way it's done now. Mass incarceration, constantly increasing healthcare costs...
Obviously anyone who thinks there might me a better way should be ridiculed. Your way is working out great for everyone.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:48 am to 4cubbies
It's time to pull back the emotion a little. That response was nonsense.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:48 am to VOR
They’re not cutting the average fricking American citizen they’re cutting illegals and people that should not be on the Medicaid dumbasses
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:49 am to 4cubbies
quote:
reasons why a demographic would be overrepresented in Medicaid enrollment.
Yes, we know you think it's because they are oppressed and due to oppression have lower income levels, and not at all because they view it as a way of life.
Why are East Asians and Indians underrepresented?
quote:
Asian Americans make up approximately 6.6% of the U.S. population, while accounting for about 6.0% of Medicaid enrollees—yielding a Medicaid-to-population ratio of ˜0.91 (i.e., 9% underrepresented)
quote:
Indian Americans make up approximately 1.4% of the U.S. population, while accounting for about 1.3% of Medicaid enrollees—yielding a Medicaid-to-population ratio of ˜0.91 (i.e., 9% underrepresented).
Why aren't they as oppressed?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:49 am to stout
I bet the husband is fat too...and probably also the kids. Medicaid is needed to treat their unhealthy lifestyle?
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 9:57 am
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:50 am to notsince98
If her husband is disabled, then Medicaid should be no problem for him even under the bill. The kids eligibility would be determined by the state. If she's below the threshold established by her state.....nothing changes.
Biggest problem for her is the cost if she piles the kid on her plan. A lot of employers will foot the bill or part of the bill with her, for only her, but then rape her financially on the kids to the tune of 1500/ month.....give or take.
Biggest problem for her is the cost if she piles the kid on her plan. A lot of employers will foot the bill or part of the bill with her, for only her, but then rape her financially on the kids to the tune of 1500/ month.....give or take.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:51 am to 4cubbies
quote:
constantly increasing healthcare costs...
Thanks Obama.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:51 am to Chicken
quote:
I bet the husband is fat too...and probably also the kids.
He is on SSI so you know he lays around all day doing nothing. Probably has a few broken-down project cars in the 6' tall grass around the trailer.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 9:53 am to Chicken
quote:
I bet the husband is fat too...and probably also the kids.
I want to know more about her living situation. I just saw an ok looking dude that couldn't get a girl in 2 million tries. There is no way this woman has two baby daddies, right?
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 9:54 am
Popular
Back to top




0






