Started By
Message

re: There was ONE Man

Posted on 10/28/23 at 10:40 am to
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
7892 posts
Posted on 10/28/23 at 10:40 am to
God did this , how?

Again, I’m not arguing. I’m attempting to understand how this played out per 1948.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 10/28/23 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

God did this , how?


You’ll need to go back to page 2.
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
13103 posts
Posted on 10/28/23 at 12:47 pm to
Muslim people believe in a false god, pray 5 times a day to satisfy their false god and want to kill all Jews and America so they can play in heaven with their many virgins except...

Jesus is victorious over the evil of this world and devil of this world and there's no way the Muslims can ever win....

So suck on that Iran
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62025 posts
Posted on 10/28/23 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Muslim people believe in a false god, pray 5 times a day to satisfy their false god and want to kill all Jews and America so they can play in heaven with their many virgins except...



This is a common trait to almost all false religions. They promise their adherents a prize that caters to the flesh.
Conversely, Jesus said,” all that follow me shall suffer persecution!”
We are also admonished in the Bible to crucify the flesh and die to self.
This post was edited on 10/28/23 at 1:13 pm
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3431 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

You have to throw this into the discussion. I think it was written first. Colossians 1:16-17


Yes, true, thanks. I guess I am just wondering how Christians choose to believe which story of Jesus becoming the son of God.

Gospels:

Paul - Jesus was the firstborn of creation, an angel who then created the universe, was given a body of flesh made of the sperm of David, and was killed in heaven by demons

Mark/Hebrews/Acts- Jesus became the son of God at his baptism when God says “You are my son, today I have begotten you”. Two Marys find the stone rolled away already at the entrance of Jesus’ tomb, find one man with a white robe inside, and ran away in fear and told no one of the resurrection.

Matthew- son of God when he was conceived and born to Mary in a house in Bethlehem with wise men bearing gifts of god, frankincense, and murr. He was born during the rein of Herod. Two Mary’s find Jesus tomb stone rolled away like in Mark but this time there’s an angel inside, and he tells the women to go tell everyone of the resurrection and they do.

Luke-son of God when he was conceived and born to Mary in an animal feed trough in a barn, and was visited by Shepherds without gifts. He was born under Quirinius. Early manuscripts show Jesus became the son of God at his Baptism, but was scrubbed in favor of newly added chapters 1 and 2 by a later scribe. Two Mary’s find the tomb stone rolled away but this time find two men inside, and the two Mary’s tell everyone.

John- Jesus was a heavenly being who came down from heaven taking a body of flesh and walked amongst us. Does mention Jesus’ mother twice but says her name was not Mary but doesn’t mention whatever her name was. Was son of God before he came down to earth. Only one Mary and Simon Peter enter Jesus’ tomb, Simon Peter runs out to tell everyone and then two angels appear to Mary.

I think it’s interesting that all these different stories can be claimed to all be the truth. I wonder if most Christians even know these details. You can’t tell the same story 4 different ways with opposing details and call it all the truth. Only one, at most, could be true.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20856 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Isiah 40:1-5 Comfort ye Comfort ye my people…..


Yael…is that you?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

This is a common trait to almost all false religions. They promise their adherents a prize that caters to the flesh.

Like a place with pearl gates and gold streets where they can live forever in happiness??

Maybe we all get our own mansion once up there...
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20856 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Paul - Jesus was the firstborn of creation, an angel who then created the universe


I will address this one. Jesus was “born” in the sense that he was presented. In context in the New Testament, he was the eternal WORD of God and he created everything as God spoke creation into existence. You can read the verses that follow immediately and they clarify that Jesus was not created. You’re fundamentally not understanding the original thought being presented by Paul.

That’s ok, you have plenty of company in the Arian camp of those who fundamentally misunderstand or misrepresent passages as they relate to Jesus being a created being. Jesus was never an Angel either.

See you have, in several of your contentions, violated at least one of the three “C”s rule. Most people mess up scripture interpretations when they don’t check for 1.Consistency 2. Context 3.Customs/verbiage of the time. I don’t have time to get into the rest of your post but you butcher much of what you say in your post.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
6477 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Your statement is a symptom of cherry picking scripture or just regurgitating what your preacher says.


So is yours when you consider all the absolute horrors the Israelites put on their enemies. I mean they had god keeping them asleep so they could get their throats cut and shite.

Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
13775 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Jew or Gentile, you must believe in Jesus to be save.

I'm not a theologian, but that statement means you need to be gentile to be saved. Really?

I'm not trying to troll you, but you insist that a tenant of the faith is that others are damned if they're not your flavor? I won't rehash that y'all are worshipping a Jew, that's everyone to their own.

I've never understood this about Christians (DV blizzard incoming), but there is far more thought paid to us Jews than there is to Islam, or many other religions. I'm trying to be tactful, but us folks cooking latkes are not your problem, regardless of what our beliefs are. Then there is the infidel designation, which includes ALL OF US, which only one religion effectively does (spare me the transliterated versions of the Talmud, you're going to read what you want to read.)

What I'm looking for is an honest, personal, explanation of your justification of effectively damning Jews. I would prefer I not get the pastor version of whatever you've been told. What do you actually think, versus what you've been instructed? Is there a difference? I'm curious.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3431 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 6:35 am to
quote:

You’re fundamentally not understanding the original thought being presented by Paul.


To me, Paul consistently states Jesus is the firstborn (eldest) of creation, and then everything after that was created by God through Jesus. I think I understand Paul’s thought on this one.

ESV Colossians 1
quote:

15He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. 16For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.


KJV Colossians 1
quote:

15Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him


Also ESV 2 Corinthians 5
quote:

20Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. 21For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.


quote:

Jesus was never an Angel either.


Not according the the writer of Hebrews. He was a created being, made to be or became superior to the (other) angels. Note just like in Colossians, God and Jesus are clearly separate entities.

Hebrews 1
quote:

3He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, 4having become as much superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs. 5For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son, today I have begotten you”? Or again, “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son”? 6And again, when he brings the firstborn into the world, he says, “Let all God’s angels worship him.” 7Of the angels he says, “He makes his angels winds, and his ministers a flame of fire.” 8But of the Son he says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom. 9You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness beyond your companions.”


Clearly Paul considers Jesus separate from God, and clearly Jesus is the leader of the angelic beings. Paul says Jesus will shout with the voice of an archangel. I don’t know how you can interpret that any differently. It is very clear.

1 Thessalonians 4
quote:

15For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord.


(And all this ending of the world will happen in Paul’s lifetime.)

quote:

See you have, in several of your contentions, violated at least one of the three “C”s rule. Most people mess up scripture interpretations when they don’t check for 1.Consistency 2. Context 3.Customs/verbiage of the time


I don’t think you’ve ever read the gospels either. Otherwise you wouldn’t have called what I wrote as “contentions”. I wasn’t asserting anything, but merely stating exactly what it says about Jesus creation/birth and the tomb scene in each gospel. If you’ll read just the last couple chapters of each gospel you’ll see my “contentions” are pulled directly from the gospels, and none of it was fabricated. The gospels state different and opposing “facts” about the same events. How are we to know which one is the right one?
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20856 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

To me, Paul consistently states Jesus is the firstborn (eldest) of creation, and then everything after that was created by God through Jesus. I think I understand Paul’s thought on this one.

ESV Colossians 1
quote:
15He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. 16For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.


KJV Colossians 1
quote:
15Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him



You speak as a Jehovah's Witness/Arian would...why not just do as they do and add "other" to the verses because they miss the concept. The original text, as I stated earlier, does not say Jesus was created...it says he was "firstborn" and Paul then clarifies he didn't mean Jesus was created by pointing out he was the conduit that created everything. You are not garnering an understanding of the original text in this passage, plus you can clearly see in countless other verses/passages in the Old and New Testament that Jesus was not created.

For example your contention is that Jesus was a created being, an angel, who then made everything else. First, according to the text you cite in Colossians here in plain English, you'd be wrong, in it's original text, you would be wrong, but when cross referenced for consistency you would still be wrong. In Isaiah 42-43 we clearly see God Almighty says he created and the Heavens and Earth BY HIMSELF. If Jesus was not fully God as a member of the Trinity...God Almighty would be lying when he said it was HE ALONE who created all things. Your take simply doesn't hold water and I could present countless other scripture that directly speaks to Jesus' divinity. Jesus himself claimed God's covenant name of Godhood in John 8:58...that's why the Jewish priests went apoplectic when he said "I am!".

quote:

16For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel,


Again you have a severe lack of understanding of scripture and you are telling on yourself here. You're trying to see out these "proof scriptures" that are generally violating one or more of the "3 C" rule I mentioned last night. This passage is in reference to the "Marriage Supper of the Lamb". It harkens back to the Jewish wedding festival where the Bridegroom comes for the bride and is announced by a shout of proclamation by the equivalent of the "best man" as we would call him circa 2023. This passage is indicating that when Jesus(bridegroom) comes for his bride "The Church" as in the Ecclesia "Church Body of Believers" to take them in what we term "The Rapture", the "Best Man" in this case is shown to be an Archangel, most likely Michael or Gabriel, shouting out and proclaiming that Jesus as the bridegroom has come to get his "Bride". I could get really deep in this and show the rubbish your contention here is but I simply don't have the time now unfortunately.

quote:

I don’t think you’ve ever read the gospels either. Otherwise you wouldn’t have called what I wrote as “contentions”


Bro, again if I had the time I could painstakingly rip apart all these misunderstandings you tossed out in your original post but maybe if something seems to contradict itself in the Bible, go back and get some more knowledge on the more intrinsic aspects of what you question and you should be able to see where you are erring in what you find to be contradictions.

This post was edited on 10/30/23 at 9:44 pm
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3431 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:31 am to
quote:

The original text, as I stated earlier, does not say Jesus was created...it says he was "firstborn" and Paul then clarifies he didn't mean Jesus was created by pointing out he was the conduit that created everything.


I wasn’t arguing for my beliefs. I was simply pointing out the differences between the writings of Paul, Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John, and considering they are saying different and opposite assertions about the same events, how would we pick which to believe.

And Paul’s writings do say Jesus was created. I quoted several that you seem to be ignoring. Paul considered Jesus as a created being, the first of creation, and Jesus to be subservient to the Father. Jesus is a “son” after all who was begat by the father. Look up begat. There is no writing of Paul that conforms to the “eternally only begotten” son of the Nicene creed. That was made up by the church.

1 Corinthians 8:6
quote:

yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.


In Colossians and Hebrews, Jesus is the “prototokos” - the first born begotten (created) son. The same word “prototokos” is used throughout the old and New Testaments to describe literal firstborn sons. Ishmael is the prototokos of Abraham. Esau is the prototokos of Isaac. Get it? Paul wrote that Jesus was begotten (made) as the firstborn of God, and God and Jesus are separate in all of Paul’s writings. Paul always calls God the Father “Theos”. Paul always calls Jesus the son LORD “Kyrios”. Jesus is always called the son of Theos. Never ever does Paul ever call Jesus son of the LORD. Because Jesus is LORD (of the Old Testament aka YHWH). The father is NOT… i repeat NOT… YHWH.

Paul had a polytheistic worldview of Deuteronomy 32. I added parentheses with Hebrew/English/Greek. You can confirm in the Septuagint.

quote:

8When the Most High (Elyon/Father/Theos) gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. 9But the LORD’s (YHWH/Son/Kyrios) portion is his people, Jacob his allotted heritage.


Paul believed in the high god Elyon who was the father of all and had many sons, the firstborn of sons was YHWH who was given lordship of Israel by Elyon his father.

quote:

plus you can clearly see in countless other verses/passages in the Old and New Testament that Jesus was not created.


Maybe so. But not written by Paul. See what I’m saying now? Hey if you can find Paul saying Jesus was not the firstborn, learn me something. But if you found something like that, to me it would contradict his letter to Colossians and his letters to Corinth and Thessalonia.

quote:

For example your contention is that Jesus was a created being, an angel, who then made everything else. First, according to the text you cite in Colossians here in plain English, you'd be wrong, in it's original text, you would be wrong


You are demonstrating cognitive dissonance and/or not paying attention. In plain English and Greek in Colossians Paul clearly states Jesus was the firstborn of creation or firstborn of all creatures. I’m not arguing Paul’s assertion, and am not agreeing or disagreeing with him. I’m just stating what Paul states. Maybe it differs from Isaiah or Matthew or John but that is an actually what I was trying to point out. Then people like you who don’t like what Paul wrote because it doesn’t conform to your indoctrinated beliefs simply go to another passage in another book you like and claim you are interpreting scripture using scripture.

quote:

If Jesus was not fully God as a member of the Trinity…


In the gospels, Jesus prayed to… himself? No one knows when the end will come, not the son (Jesus), but only the father… sorry bud but I ain’t buying your Trinity. It isn’t even biblical. Arius had a point.

quote:

God Almighty would be lying when he said it was HE ALONE who created all things.


Maybe he was lying? He lied to Adam telling him if he ate the fruit he would die that very day, but Adam lived 900 years. He lied and deceived all throughout the Bible. And bragged about it.

1 Kings 22:22
quote:

And the LORD said to him, ‘By what means?’ And he said, ‘I will go out, and will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.’ And he said, ‘You are to entice him, and you shall succeed; go out and do so.’


Ezekiel 14:9
quote:

And if the prophet is deceived and speaks a word, I, the LORD, have deceived that prophet, and I will stretch out my hand against him and will destroy him from the midst of my people Israel.


Jeremiah 20:7
quote:

7O LORD, you have deceived me, and I was deceived; you are stronger than I, and you have prevailed. I have become a laughingstock all the day; everyone mocks me.


quote:

Again you have a severe lack of understanding of scripture and you are telling on yourself here. You're trying to see out these "proof scriptures" that are generally violating one or more of the "3 C" rule I mentioned last night. This passage is in reference to the "Marriage Supper of the Lamb"


Malarkey. Think about what you are saying. You are alleging Paul wrote to the Thessalonians in mainland Greece about something he thought would happen on the last day and included hidden meanings of a Jewish wedding ceremony that those gentiles would have known nothing about? You are purposely ignoring the passages’ plain and obvious meaning.

Paul wrote Jesus himself will descend with the voice of an archangel and the trumpet of God. I think I’ve got a better understanding of the scripture than you on this matter and on top of that I acknowledge what it actually says and I don’t use mental gymnastics to twist it into something it doesn’t say. I’m not arguing Jesus is or was an angel, only that Paul said Jesus was an angel.

Galatians 4:14
quote:

and though my condition was a trial to you, you did not scorn or despise me, but received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus.


Ok next we have to go to Philippians 2: Paul believed Jesus was a divine spirit, firstborn of creation, and archangel, who took a body of sinful flesh so he could be killed like a man, and therefore earn his name “Jesus” and be exalted. Paul never considered Jesus to be equal to god the Father.
quote:

5Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7but emptied himself, by taking the form of a slave, being made in the likeness of men. 8And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, 10so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.


quote:

Bro, again if I had the time I could painstakingly rip apart all these misunderstandings


What is there to rip apart? Everything is right out the Bible.

When you are reading your bible thinking it is divinely inspired, remember this from Jeremiah 8:8…

quote:

How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law (Torah) of the LORD is with us’? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 7:09 am
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20856 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

And Paul’s writings do say Jesus was created. I quoted several that you seem to be ignoring. Paul considered Jesus as a created being, the first of creation


I can’t tackle all of your post now but Paul absolutely didn’t consider Jesus as being created. Again you are conflating the term “firstborn” with being created and in the next set of verses that immediately follow, Paul distinguishes that ALL things were created by Christ and through Christ as a conduit as being the eternal word of God, the Second person of the tri-une Godhead who is co-eternal. Again this is further clarified by God in many passages, including those I spoke of in Isaiah.

Look at Isaiah 44:24

Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer who formed you from the womb: "I am the LORD, who has made all things, who alone stretched out the heavens, who by Myself spread out the earth

It’s unambiguous what is said. If Christ was created as say an angel, then what God Almighty says here isn’t true that he created all things ALONE, BY MySELF. Christ was not created and Paul painstakingly made sure he deliberately used words that conveyed this.
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 4:20 pm
Posted by Monahans
Member since Sep 2019
2170 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 5:08 pm to
Anyone who denies Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior will NOT inherit HIS kingdom.

How have so many so called Christians cast this very fundamental tenet of the faith aside?
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3431 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Paul absolutely didn’t consider Jesus as being created.


You are ignoring Paul’s literal words he wrote.

quote:

Again you are conflating the term “firstborn” with being created and in the next set of verses that immediately follow,


Multiple times Paul calls Jesus the firstborn of Theos or the firstborn of the created beings as already quoted directly from the Bible that you are ignoring. Jesus is the firstborn of Theos like Ishmael is the firstborn of Abraham. The same word prototokos is used for firstborn in the Greek for Jesus and Ishmael.

quote:

the Second person of the tri-une Godhead who is co-eternal


That may be your personal belief but it wasn’t what Paul wrote when he described his own beliefs. He wrote there he has one God and one Lord and he wrote that Jesus was not equal to the father. It’s frustrating that I know you can read but you are ignoring the plain text of the Bible that I posted.

The co-eternal Trinity is non-biblical and only made up and “won” over the other “heresies” in the 400s CE nearly 300 years after the gospels were written. It was a hotly contested debate between docetism, Arianism, modalism, and later trinitarianism. The church argued about it for 400 years and Christians today still argue. Again it’s fine if that’s your belief but don’t act like there’s overwhelming demonstrable evidence in the Bible because there isn’t.

quote:

Look at Isaiah 44:24 Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer who formed you from the womb: "I am the LORD, who has made all things, who alone stretched out the heavens, who by Myself spread out the earth


Oh are you a big believer in the flat earth, and the firmament that separates the water in outer space from the earth? That’s what is being described in that verse. It’s the same way Marduk stretched out the water dragon Tiamat after killing it to make the flat earth and the domed sky in Babylonian mythology. Well anyway this is just comparing post-Babylonian defeat Isaiah versus Christian texts from 500 years later. Of course there would be different views of the authors. God also in Isaiah 45:7 says he makes the light and the darkness, and he alone creates good and evil. That “second Isaiah” was written before they adopted the more modern concept of a divine bad guy (Satan) from Persian Zoroastrianism.

Don’t forget that many of the books of the Old Testament especially were not the same version Paul used or were outright rejected by Paul. The reverse is true. One of if not the most important “Old Testament” book for Paul and early Christians and pre-Christians (like the Dead Sea scrolls Essenes) was Enoch. And Enoch got left out of your Old Testament. The New Testament writers make constant references to Enoch and Jude even quotes it directly in your Bible.

Again it wasn’t my intention to argue for or against modern Christian beliefs or Paul’s. I was merely pointing out a few differences in the gospels, and asking how do you pick which one to believe since they all say different and opposing things about the same subject matter.

I’ll try to make this easy for you. Compare the scene where they go to the tomb of Jesus…

Mark
- stone rolled away already
- man inside the tomb tells of the resurrection
- two women leave and tell no one

Matthew:
- stone not rolled away yet
- angel appears to tell of resurrection
- no one inside the tomb
- two women leave and tell everyone

Luke:
- stone rolled away already
- two men in the tomb tell of resurrection
- two women leave and tell everyone

John:
- stone rolled away already
- only one woman Mary Magdalene and two disciples go to the tomb
- Mary doesn’t enter but two disciples do. No one is inside to greet them to say Jesus was resurrected and they all think his body was stolen. Disciples go home dumbfounded.
- then two angels appear in the tomb
- Jesus finally appears to Mary Magdalene to say he was resurrected

Ok so those are four conflicting stories. What really happened??? I’d appreciate if you ignored all the Paul stuff and simply state how you picked which story of the resurrection to believe, seeing as they all tell a different story.
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 5:55 pm
Posted by Miketheseventh
Member since Dec 2017
6807 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

There IS ONE Man

I fixed it for you. He’s still very relevant
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram