Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/12/16 at 10:55 am to
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 10:55 am to
Don't forget due process my delicate little flower.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Don't forget due process my delicate little flower.



Please don't ever call me that again
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22354 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 10:59 am to
The far easier way to address illegals is to deny them welfare benefits and go after the physical assets of those that employ them. Illegal running a weedeater for a landscaping service? Take the weedeater. Take the truck and trailer. Demagnetize the economy and they'll go home. But that won't happen because the Dems want dirty votes and the Reps want cheap labor.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26966 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Does that change anyone's opinion or are you still cool with it?


Why not? How the hell did you think the interstate highway system got built? Landowners get paid for their land. And we aren't exactly talking about prime real estate.
This post was edited on 11/12/16 at 11:00 am
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I just wonder if any of the owners will say, "hell, you build the wall and you can have the land". Patriotic kind of thingy.



Yep, I'm sure Texans will just bend over.


Seriously, go visit Brownsville and report back.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26966 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Reps want cheap labor.



Everyone wants cheap labor.
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12803 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Sure, they worry about the trespassers.

But, I think landowners are smart enough to realize that something like a 20 foot wall is not going to stop anyone.

All you need is a ladder or a shovel


Worry about trespassers is a bit disingenuous. Ranchers in Texas face huge economic costs associated with illegal immigrants ranging from destruction of property to potential lawsuits from people dying on their land.

I don't know how tall the wall will actually be, but it's been reported to be 55 ft tall and buried deep into the ground. So that will require a really big ladder and a lot of digging.

The simple point is, the wall, where properly enforced, acts as a much bigger deterrent than an open border or no no enforcement on the existing wall. In addition, turning over more authority (via law) to private property owners could alleviate trespassing.
Posted by YellowShoe
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2006
1381 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Very few will be against it

Lot's of folks are against it for various reasons.
- its a hassle crossing the wall to reach their land
- there are plenty of golf courses on the other side of the wall
- some ranches are 30 mins to hour away, when they were 5 minutes away
- wall may have to be built miles inland in some instances
Posted by Wrenchruh
Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2012
2413 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:21 am to
This. My dad lived in Brownsville for years. We talked about the logistics last night. He mentioned in many places the wall cuts farmland leaving a lot of farmland in US territory on the Mexico side of the wall. The solution, holes in the wall where access roads exist so farmers can move equipment around and do their job.

Holes. Not gates. Just gaps with a road in the middle. No guards. Nothing. fricking government at its finest.

The idea of a wall sounds good except when you look at the reality of the local situation. People on both sides travel back and forth everyday as part their everyday lives. Hell my dad went across everyday to go to his job in Mexico.

Rather than sinking money into a wall, a nice start would be actually enforcing our existing laws first. Mexican immigration laws are much more strictly enforced than our own. If my dad forgot his work papers, the guards he was on a first name basis with at the plant he ran would not allow him on property because the fine if caught was significant. Something in the neighborhood of 50,000 USD per offense.

Enforce the laws we actually have. Provide a deterrent to employers hiring illegally. Try these first before spending a fortune on something that would only be a detriment to the local economy.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68321 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:23 am to
quote:

If we're going to build this thing, the government is going to have to steal quite a bit of property.


You're so fricking desperate. I'll bet those landowners are more tired of the bodies and criminals they find on their property than the nominal amount of land they'll lose.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Nope. I'd think that the majority of the landowners will be glad to see it.



This. You have no idea how many AZ ranchers on the border would like to see more DHS involvement.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

You're so fricking desperate. I'll bet those landowners are more tired of the bodies and criminals they find on their property than the nominal amount of land they'll lose.



Nominal? The Rio Grand area wall will have to be built a mile from the border, at a minimum. There are houses on the other side of the wall already.

People have to use gate codes to get to their homes.

There's going to be a huge fight against the wall in Texas, even though most are conservatives.

It's not a conservative/liberal "you're so desperate" thing. Go to Brownsville and report back.
This post was edited on 11/12/16 at 12:09 pm
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Don't forget due process my delicate little flower.


Please don't ever call me that again


Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Seriously, go visit Brownsville and report back.


You seem to be familiar with the area so, is there a problem with illegals crossing in the Brownsville area as opposed to "in the middle of nowhere Bumfrick, Texas?"
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51687 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

If we're going to build this thing, the government is going to have to steal quite a bit of property.


That's not the only thing. There's a shitload of environmental impact red tape he's going to have to overcome as well as justifying the cost as we approach $20T in debt.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

That's not the only thing. There's a shitload of environmental impact red tape he's going to have to overcome as well as justifying the cost as we approach $20T in debt.


Do as Obama would strike down any environmental obstacles with executive orders.
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20408 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 3:35 pm to
U.S. government will buy any property needed. Also, people that have property on the border already have issues. Fences are cut all the time, vacant homes/hunting camps are broken into. In fact, if you have a hunting camp anywhere along the border most of them are unlocked with a sign on the door that asks people in spanish not to break things.

The larger ranches that are game fenced have big ladders going over them every couple of miles to try and keep their more expensive fences from getting cut or destroyed.

People that don't go near the border have no idea what has been going on down there for the past 15 years. No idea.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12906 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 4:00 pm to
Yeah, I doubt any of them will be forced. The money offered to them as fair compensation would probably be the best offer they have gotten for that land from anyone not part of a drug cartel.

The chances of also benefiting by not having starving illegal aliens traipsing across their land resulting in stores looted, people stampeded, and cattle raped may also tip the scales to favor the government in a voluntary transaction.
This post was edited on 11/12/16 at 4:02 pm
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12906 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

quote:
Don't forget due process my delicate little flower.


Please don't ever call me that again


You're such a delicate flower that you post on an anonymous message board a directive to not call you a delicate flower? Doesn't that defeat the purpose?

Did it go over your head, that you made his point? You are indeed with 100% certainty a delicate flower, and a snowflake I might add.
This post was edited on 11/12/16 at 4:26 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram