- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Viking guy from January 6 has been sentenced to 41 months in prison...
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:32 am to AUHighPlainsDrifter
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:32 am to AUHighPlainsDrifter
quote:
He was the most prominently shown guy in most news outlets so he is to be made an example of. That ridiculous get-up he was wearing probably just cost him 2 years of freedom.
When you dress that way for an event like that, you’re not doing it for any other reason than to draw attention to yourself and make the situation about YOU
I have no issue with what happened on 1/6 but I feel like this douche got what he deserved. I don’t feel sorry for him
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:33 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Did "the Board" demand multi year prison sentences for those people? I don't recall seeing that. I suppose maybe someone could find it if "IT" did.
No they are only relying on them as a weird example of hypocrisy as some sort of a justification for their team's actions. They're admitting the behavior is wrong/illegal while then, elsewhere, arguing that it wasn't so bad...but the less extreme example was actually the bad one.
Hypocrisy isn't precedent.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
Thirty something that lives at home with mom....so MAGA
Trump sent his elite shock troops to capital
then took another bunion deferment rather than lead them like he said

Trump sent his elite shock troops to capital
then took another bunion deferment rather than lead them like he said
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:34 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
He does need jail time but that is extremely excessive
I may disagree with you some, but thank god you are at least honest. That puts you in a much better class than the emotional wrecks arguing for the punishment.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:35 am to Tmcgin
quote:
Thirty something that lives at home with mom....so MAGA
Trump sent his elite shock troops to capital
then took another bunion deferment rather than lead them like he said
Good for you. I guess.
At least your point makes sense.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:36 am to Tmcgin
quote:
Trump sent his elite shock troops to capital then took another bunion deferment rather than lead them like he said
Imagine being such a pathetic progressive that you tell this lie.
Yikes.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
justification for their team's actions.
LMAO... Your idea of "severe" is what really sucks...
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No they are only relying on them as a weird example of hypocrisy as some sort of a justification for their team's actions. They're admitting the behavior is wrong/illegal while then, elsewhere, arguing that it wasn't so bad...but the less extreme example was actually the bad one.
Seemed the only focus of the argument here was the idea of this relatively lengthy sentence. You seem to be extrapolating quite a bit out of that.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Long way from the doors skippy...
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Oh wow, look that!
leading others in to obstruct things and he did stuff like this:
What happened to the hunger strikers in Pelosi's office who eventually barged in when their demands weren't met? I mean besides getting an entire story on their cause after their arrest. WaPo unfortunately
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 11:42 am
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:40 am to UsingUpAllTheLetters
quote:
I mean yes, but that's no reason to sentence him in such a draconian fashion. This is political theater. We are living out Soviet show trials.
Meanwhile the Kavanaugh hearing insurrectionists got how many years? This kind of absurd double standard is destroying all faith in the judicial system. The courts and the DNC's FBI Goon Squad have become purely partisan crooks.

Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:40 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:
I have no issue with what happened on 1/6 but I feel like this douche got what he deserved. I don’t feel sorry for him
He didn't do anything worth 41 months in prison.
Anyone who participated in 1/6 used poor judgment because it was a painfully obvious setup. The last thing you do is trust the establishment to be fair regardless of what you do.
The fact I think the sentence is nothing but political doesn't change the fact that people used poor judgment.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:41 am to RollTide1987
He's a paid actor and has nothing to do with the actual Q so good for him
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:42 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Seemed the only focus of the argument here was the idea of this relatively lengthy sentence.
He argued in support of lengthy sentencing. His whole ruse was setting up the severity.
Of course, he plays both sides but then still argues one.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:42 am to SlowFlowPro
This is so disingenuous, nobody is saying he shouldn’t be punished. The issue is the harsh punishment because he went against the NWO.
This guy gets 3 years, a kid shot people at a HS in Texas and is out on bond the next day.
This guy gets 3 years, a kid shot people at a HS in Texas and is out on bond the next day.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:43 am to RollTide1987
I'm sure the GOP will soon step up on behalf of these political prisoners.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:43 am to Beauw
quote:
This is so disingenuous, nobody is saying he shouldn’t be punished. The issue is the harsh punishment because he went against the NWO.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:44 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Seemed the only focus of the argument here was the idea of this relatively lengthy sentence. Y
But the sentence isn't just for the trespassing (or even the rioting outside). It's bout the interference with the session.
The Kavagirls didn't get to that level so that point isn't really even comparable.
Is this draconian? Sure. But in terms of draconian criminal laws, it's barely on the radar.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But the sentence isn't just for the trespassing (or even the rioting outside). It's bout the interference with the session.
Here you are again, supporting the lengthy sentence while claiming to do otherwise.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He argued in support of lengthy sentencing.
Quote my wording in this thread supporting lengthy sentencing.
Not your interpretation. Actual words.
Not comments about his conviction and what he was convicted of. Words about the sentence.
Popular
Back to top


1






