- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Supreme Court Is Poised to Strike Down Race-Based Redistricting
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:13 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:13 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
For example, thinking that people with dark skin color are inferior and of less value or dignity as human beings (or thinking they are not human beings worthy of dignity at all) to those with lighter skin color.
What if it isn't based on skin color but on behavior and cultural differences?
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:15 pm to SallysHuman
If struck down then will the states have time to create new districts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:21 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
If you're having to cheat to have a chance in the midterms, you're more than likely going to be killed in the midterms.
How specifically is the GOP cheating?
Do you believe that gerrymandering in and of itself is cheating?
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:22 pm to SallysHuman
quote:I think the gist is that we should be condemning actions, not people for the way they look.
What if it isn't based on skin color but on behavior and cultural differences?
If you think all black people are bad because there is a higher percentage of crime in predominantly black communities, that would be wrong. If you were to highlight a cultural issue that seems to be leading to bad outcomes with the desire for those issues to be addressed, that would not be racism in itself.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:24 pm to WHS
quote:
I think it is racist to assume that a black will always vote for a black which in its self is racist in nature because the black candidate will not always be the best choice based off merit.
It's not racist... it's history and pattern recognition. I could provide an endless list of examples.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:25 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
cheat
Have you told your side this? They love racially gerrymandering. They've been the only side permitted to racially gerrymander. Nerd.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:26 pm to Bonkers119
quote:Who's cheating? Just playing by the same rules democrats have been playing by for years.
If you're having to cheat to have a chance in the midterms
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The weirdest conceptual part of this is crafting the policy around parties. Gerrymandering, too. It just makes so many assumptions about the parties and society. It basically requires a completely stagnant view of both that doesn't reflect reality
What a word salad
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:27 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
quote:
Racism is evil.
What even IS racism? Seriously, what is it?
Something that has barely existed in the last couple decades against anyone but white people.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:28 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
What if it isn't based on skin color but on behavior and cultural differences
Sorry. That's "racism" now.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:29 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Something that has barely existed in the last couple decades against anyone but white people.
Achskshually... ah, nevermind... I can't type out that people in power bullshite out even with tongue in cheek.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:31 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
If you're having to cheat to have a chance in the midterms
But how else will Democrats win if they can't rely on the race-based districting cheat they've used for decades?
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:33 pm to Jbird
This case and the 14th Amendment birthright citizenship decisions (likely released at the end of June, 2026) are my frontrunners for being the matches that light the fuse on the George Floyd Memorial Hunger Games 2026.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:33 pm to Jbird
They'll allow the blue states to gerrymander all they want but shut down the red states from doing it. This is the way everything always goes.
This post was edited on 12/10/25 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:34 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
If you're having to cheat to have a chance in the midterms, you're more than likely going to be killed in the midterms
Delicious melt
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:34 pm to VoxDawg
quote:No doubt.
the matches that light the fuse on the George Floyd Memorial Hunger Games 2026.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:39 pm to Jbird
quote:
As readers of this magazine are well aware, for decades American society has been roiled by what we are slowly coming to see as the Supreme Court’s unwarranted judicial audacity—if not impudence, arrogance, and illegitimacy.
But cornerstones of the Black Robe Firewall like Jeb Boasberg are heroes, amirite?
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:41 pm to Jbird
quote:
Previous Supreme Court cases have made clear that such a race-based redistricting remedy was permissible to correct clearly proven race-based discrimination on the part of malevolent state officials.
OR - and hear me out - minorities are minorities and offering preferential treatment to pander to those minorities is grossly unconstitutional.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:45 pm to Jbird
Unfortunately, the redistricting in Cali isn’t based on race. It’s based on historical voting patterns and tries to water down red voting areas by combining them with larger blue voting populations.
For example, a corner of Orange County might be placed in the same district as a part of LA County so Dem candidates will be elected, and GOP votes will be negated.
For example, a corner of Orange County might be placed in the same district as a part of LA County so Dem candidates will be elected, and GOP votes will be negated.
This post was edited on 12/10/25 at 12:46 pm
Popular
Back to top



3








