- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Supreme Court is CONSIDERING Taking Up a 2020 Election Case
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:48 am to squid_hunt
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:48 am to squid_hunt
Does anyone know where we can read Brunson's proof/evidence that he planned on presenting to the trial court that the election was rigged?
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 9:49 am
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:48 am to BoarEd
quote:
That lawyer
Wasn't this filed pro se?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:49 am to SlapahoeTribe
No such thing as DWI checkpoints anymore. Now they are license checks that result in DUIs....
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:49 am to SlowFlowPro
I think the dude who filed it is an attorney.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:50 am to GumboPot
quote:As Wednesday said (to paraphrase), 95% of pro se litigants are just engaging in a jurisprudential primal scream.
I read the entire petition. So congress has a constitutional duty to "investigate" rigged elections?
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 9:51 am
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:55 am to Animal
quote:I have not read this thread to see how we got to of DUI's...
No such thing as DWI checkpoints anymore. Now they are license checks that result in DUIs....
But this was correct even many years ago. I was being driven to the ER in the middle of the night in severe pain. We were stopped asked to see DL. They saw my pain level and let us go.
In better times they would have saw my pain level was worse than when I didn't call an ambo and offered no escort.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 10:38 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 11/16/22 at 10:41 am to BoarEd
quote:Bless your heart. You've whiffed on this every instance for 2 years, and you're still at it.
> it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress
I admire your resolve, but not your results.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 10:46 am to 4TheLoveLSU
quote:
Many commentators calling it a nothing burger, is to fail to see what is hidden within it.
Trump says of Nancy House speaker, she is on her way to another country to get fired.
(Read that as shot in Gitmo) - to this point there is a video of Nancy getting put into an all black SUV with some Agents, speculation is she was handcuffed.
Trump did Not say he was running in 2024. He said, I am running for the Presidency.
And he referred to himself as C in C
This is where the Q tards and devolution folks are taking it to maintain the narrative
Posted on 11/16/22 at 11:10 am to BoarEd
... not counting this development out ...
... we shall see ...
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:34 pm to BoarEd
quote:
this thread will have aged like a fine wine
I’m not trying to be mean when I ask you this -
Have ANY of your (or anyone else’s) predictions or threads or estimations ever aged well?
Kinda like JJDOC and JimmyJJ or whatever the frick or any Q/watermarked ballots/Trump 4-D chess/Kraken/scorecard/Dominion/hammer threads, it never ever ever turns out to be real and some of you just continue to fall for it.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 10:50 pm to Dday63
The Supreme Court hasn’t agreed to hear the case. They gave the government till 11-23 to file a response. It isn’t going to be heard because members of Congress have 11th amemdment immunity for their official acts, and also because he hasn’t not alleged an injury particular to himself.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 10:31 am to BoarEd
I read the filing. there is zero evidence included. Only allegations of a fraudulent election. Additionally, the guy's beef should be with the individual State's Secretaries of State since they are the ones that certify and investigate allegations of fraud. The certification of the election by Congress is a formality. That's why Trump had conversations with some of the State Secretaries of State following their State's reporting of results.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 10:33 am to BoarEd
On the 23rd they will decide whether to hear the case.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 3:06 pm to GumboPot
Their duty is to uphold the Oath of Office and when on January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding
and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”).
Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the
2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice
President of the United States under Amendment XII.
During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress
claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged.
The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this
congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and
This
fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has
the same end result as an act of war; to place into power
whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if
not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the
fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and
courts of law.
It's a legal duty to adhere to the Oath of Office by Law:
LINK
and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”).
Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the
2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice
President of the United States under Amendment XII.
During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress
claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged.
The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this
congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and
This
fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has
the same end result as an act of war; to place into power
whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if
not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the
fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and
courts of law.
It's a legal duty to adhere to the Oath of Office by Law:
LINK
Posted on 11/18/22 at 9:24 am to TheRoarRestoredInBR
I read the petition and looks tight. We are not a captured operation! The military is in full control! This is the beginning of the end for all piece of shite communists and other lowly figures. All globalists, socialists, and communists that entered the American government will be hung! Glory to God!
Posted on 11/18/22 at 9:26 am to Lambchops11
It was filed in October. The court will decide if it wants to hear it by November 23rd. The petition pretty much lays out why they HAVE TO HEAR IT and compels them to
Posted on 11/18/22 at 9:27 am to BrilliantKlutzy
Moron the evidence comes after
Popular
Back to top


0








