- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The republican party should embrace gay marriage.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:44 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:44 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
You dont have to embrace gay marriage. Just embrace personal liberty.
DING DING DING, WE HAVE A WINNER!
0
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:47 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
You dont have to embrace gay marriage. Just embrace personal liberty.
And if you don't bake the cake (in accordance with your religious beliefs) we will DESTROY you.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Basic understanding of reality.
Lmao
quote:
Two dudes in a contract with each other has no effect on my individual moral standing. None whatsoever. They made a choice, not I.
So you choosing to accept it as normal has no affect on yourself whatsoever?
quote:
That's 100% on them. It's not my job to protect their sense of morality
Correct, but turning a blind eye to something that is wrong for the sake of not hurting their feelings is wrong too.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:49 pm to Esquire
You honestly do not see the difference?
Tell me the basis for morals please.
Tell me the basis for morals please.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:50 pm to jnethe1
quote:
you choosing to accept it as normal has no affect on yourself whatsoever?
The issue is Fredom and it has no affect whatsoever on me..
Now you start taking a cock up your arse and it does affect your morality
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:50 pm to jnethe1
quote:
You honestly do not see the difference?
There is no difference in the eyes of the Lord, which is the only rational basis for morality.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:52 pm to jnethe1
quote:
but turning a blind eye to something that is wrong
It's not wrong to them, and doesn't affect me
I'm not their conscience.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:52 pm to Pechon
quote:
Why bring it up?
Because someone make a claim that 2 people can enter a contract; I just asked why it was limited to 2.
quote:
You're making the claim, I'm simply asking for a source. Cite it.
You're asking me for a citation to prove the fact that Obergefell immediately superseded state laws that defined marriage as a man and a woman?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:54 pm to Chaka
Gay marriage is what opened the door to all this tranny bullshite. Americans have now gotten accustomed to the common sense majority bending over backwards and catering to a loud whacko minority on all social issues.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:54 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Small govt is real conservatism.
Activist courts aren't small government.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:55 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
And if you don't bake the cake
I'm.for freedom, my opinion in this thread supports that.
One day y'all will figure out that banning gay marriage and forcing baker's to make a cake come from the same people, authoritarians.
They'll do to you, why you do to them.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:56 pm to Flats
quote:
Activist courts aren't small government.
Correct
More laws create more activism
One day y'all will figure that out
Posted on 11/16/22 at 12:58 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Just embrace personal liberty.
I want the liberty to have an orgy in the public park. I want the liberty to show hard porn on an LED billboard right across from your kid's elementary school. Do I have that liberty or do people like yourselves want to restrict me?
True liberty is anarchy, and I don't know too many anarchists. The rest of us want laws that restrict certain behaviors. We may disagree on which behaviors, but you want to restrict liberty, as do I. You just pretend that you don't while I acknowledge it.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Correct
Yet here you are cheering it because you agreed with the outcome.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:00 pm to Flats
quote:
want the liberty to have an orgy in the public park.
The gay couple can't do it either.
But them.getting hitched has absolutely no bearing on you at all.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:02 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
change the meaning of language
Language is fluid.
There are a myriad of words in the English language that have markedly deviated from their original meanings.
Marriage as used to refer to a homosexual union is a very mild alteration comparatively speaking.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:03 pm to Flats
quote:
Yet here you are cheering it because you agreed with the outcome.
Not cheering at all.
I am not a hypocrite on personal liberty like you.
They'll keep doing the same to you. Y'all keep playing this stupid game
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:04 pm to Flats
quote:
I want the liberty to have an orgy in the public park. I want the liberty to show hard porn on an LED billboard right across from your kid's elementary school.
You argue like a Democrat. BamaAtl would love it.
"Oh, you want to own a pistol for self defense? Guess we should give you nuclear weapons, too?"
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:05 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Oh, you want to own a pistol for self defense? Guess we should give you nuclear weapons, too?"
Yep. These arguments are exhausting
mAGA doesn't care for freedom. Good to know.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 1:09 pm to Norbert
quote:For more than twenty years, I have been saying "just GIVE the damned word 'marriage' to the religious folks, since it seems so fricking important to them. Make a new word ("civiage," maybe?) for the civil/legal side of things."
There are a myriad of words in the English language that have markedly deviated from their original meanings.
Marriage as used to refer to a homosexual union is a very mild alteration comparatively speaking.
The only problem is the cost and hassle of revising the statutes of fifty states, plus territories and the federal government. But if it costs $1 billion, it is money well-spent to end this particular stupid, semantic debate.
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News