- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The real reason HCQ, ivermectin and any other early treatment for COVID was demonized.
Posted on 8/30/22 at 4:40 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 8/30/22 at 4:40 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
No, because the plural of anecdote has never been data.
LOL
there were 11 separate case studies from that one origin point, meathead
Posted on 8/30/22 at 4:53 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
...because they don't work.
Ivermectin stops the nuclear transport of viral proteins, aka the spike protein. If it's administered early, it keeps the viral load of COVID low, which allows your body to fight off the virus.
This post was edited on 8/30/22 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 5:00 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
...because they don't work.
And how do you know they don't work....you don't know shite!
Posted on 8/30/22 at 5:12 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
there were 11 separate case studies from that one origin point
That's a statistical power of "lol"
Posted on 8/30/22 at 5:31 pm to BamaAtl
You cited the approval study for Pfizer’s vax which is now clearly fraudulent. Not sure you should be taken seriously on any of this.
Posted on 8/30/22 at 5:46 pm to BamaAtl
Go take a look at New Zealand and how they are faring right now.
Maybe one of the highest % of vaxxed total population.
Some of the most draconian restrictions .
They did well very early on restricting the spread of Alpha in the early days.
Right now they are being absolutely ravaged by this newest weak Omicron BA. 5 variant.
Contrast that with South Africa. They kicked the BA 5 wave quickly with few hospitalizations.
They had comparably
. A very low vaccination status and rate.
It’s beyond dispute at current, that the fully vaxxed and boosted are getting their asses handed to them by these new variants.
The non vaxxed are not getting the virus.
Maybe one of the highest % of vaxxed total population.
Some of the most draconian restrictions .
They did well very early on restricting the spread of Alpha in the early days.
Right now they are being absolutely ravaged by this newest weak Omicron BA. 5 variant.
Contrast that with South Africa. They kicked the BA 5 wave quickly with few hospitalizations.
They had comparably
. A very low vaccination status and rate.
It’s beyond dispute at current, that the fully vaxxed and boosted are getting their asses handed to them by these new variants.
The non vaxxed are not getting the virus.
This post was edited on 8/30/22 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 5:57 pm to the808bass
quote:
Not sure you should be taken seriously on any of this.
This has been a given for quite a while.
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:06 pm to GumboPot
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:12 pm to the808bass
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:12 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Oh you're fricking wrong there. It absolutely would have destroyed the vaccine.
I’m not. Thank you for your input.
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:16 pm to STEVED00
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:19 pm to ksayetiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:24 pm to GumboPot
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:30 pm to BamaAtl
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m not. Thank you for your input.
quote:
For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.
FDA says you are
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:31 pm to BamaAtl
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:32 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
BamaAtl
quote:
Yep
…
quote:
However, even when significantly diluted by exclusion of disputed trials, meta-analysis continues to show an improved mortality outcome. Moreover, additional data from the later trials are broadly consistent with the original findings.
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:33 pm to memphisplaya
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:35 pm to Lightning
And yet they approved Remdesivir, three vaccines, 4 different Mabs and two antivirals (among others). If the theory in the OP is accurate, they could’ve only approved one of the above.
Posted on 8/30/22 at 7:35 pm to the808bass
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 7:36 pm
Popular
Back to top



1



