re: The MSM will have the very same tune for the next 21 months. Here is an example below:

The nuclear facilities were destroyed

But Iran was also rebuilding them

But they were set back by years

But they were about to get their hands on a nuke

But they also haven't touched them since we obliterated them

All of these things are true and you're a TDS libtard if you don't agree!

quote:

---

How is this any different than the White House saying Iran's nuclear capabilities have been "obliterated" and "set back many years" then all of a sudden all the MAGA bros are chanting "Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuke?"

---

How stupid do you have to be to not understand the passage of time?

Obliterated and set back many years pertains to the facilities known. Nobody claimed that Iran didn’t have enriched uranium but rather that Iran stored away from the areas bombed. I’m pretty sure we as everyday peons don’t have a clue what is honestly happening but I would rather be American first in away of living than worrying about in 1-3 years of living with added threats from a religious group that has made known their intentions for America

quote:

---

That's a video of Marco Rubio responding to a FAKE NEWS CNN report that said Iran's nuclear capabilities were only set back "by a matter of months rather than years." His words were "That story is a false story and it's one that really shouldn't be re-reported because it doesn't accurately reflect what’s happening."

Are you calling Marco Rubio a liar and aligning yourself with the propaganda mouthpiece that is CNN? You little commie?

---

Sigh. This has been discussed numerous times. This will be the 3rd time I've posted it alone. Hopefully this time it will actually stick in your memory.

Iran was producing so many missiles and drones that if we allowed it to go much further, they would have a shield that allows them to develop a nuclear weapon without anyone being able to stop them without causing far more destruction in the region.

I don't know how to say it any simpler. Maybe there is a SPED teacher here with more experience dealing with those who struggle to grasp basic concepts like more weapons means more death.

quote:

---

How is this any different than the White House saying Iran's nuclear capabilities have been "obliterated" and "set back many years" then all of a sudden all the MAGA bros are chanting "Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuke?"

---

JFC... You are such a little TDS bitch.

quote:

---

How do you define "nuclear capabilities"? Provide that, and I'll give you an answer on how it's any different.

---

I can only tell you what the White House said:

quote:

---

President Trump: Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!

---

quote:

---

Israel Atomic Energy Commission: “The devastating US strike on Fordo destroyed the site’s critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable. We assess that the American strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran’s military nuclear program, has set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years

---

quote:

---

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth: “Based on everything we have seen — and I’ve seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons. Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.”

---

quote:

---

Institute for Science and International Security President David Albright: “Overall, Israel’s and U.S. attacks have effectively destroyed Iran’s centrifuge enrichment program. It will be a long time before Iran comes anywhere near the capability it had before the attack.

---

quote:

---

Institute for Science and International Security Senior Research Fellow Spencer Faragasso: “Overall, it may possibly take years for Iran to reconstitute the capabilities it lost at these facilities.”

---

Okay, what about the already enriched uranium they had? Do you not think it's reasonable that we should take that from them?

First, I admit I am no expert in the enrichment process. But I have more than average knowledge. I am in the nuclear industry.

Do you know what a centrifuge is? Do you know how big or how small they are? Do you know how relatively easy or difficult it would be to acquire or build more of them? Do you know what it takes and how long it takes to enrich from 60% to 90%?

The above is the tip of the iceberg. It's the very beginning of the knowledge required to make an honest opinion on this whole matter.

Exactly!!

quote:

---

I think this latest military action was more about Israel launching attacks with or without us. If we're not involved Israel would not have any restraints, with the US involved we can influence Israels actions.

---

You may be right but I think that's a weak excuse if true.