- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The most Californian thing you'll hear all day: tax empty store fronts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
I would rent my space to my Leasing agency for $1 a month. They could put for lease signs in it or something like that.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:55 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Maybe you can show us your expertise and explain how horrible investing in California is.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
common-sense
Liberals have no idea what this term means
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:00 pm to ShortyRob
They are worried about empty storefronts being an eyesore, but not the shot, urine, and needles on the sidewalk in front of that storefront.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:03 pm to mmcgrath
So you think the increases from the 90s has something to do with the current real estate prices? This is also for higher tier homes, not typical investment properties. And lastly, you leave out basic cash flow, which is always in the red in California. Basing investment success solely off of appreciation shows you’re pretty clueless here.
This post was edited on 11/21/19 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:03 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Up next: California government to sieze all empty lots and buildings and redistribute them as they see fit.
Make shelters for the homeless problem.
Problem solved
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
So increased property values increase property taxes that price out businesses and their solution is to tax property owners in order to force them to rent out empty spaces that are already too pricey to rent out?
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:06 pm to nugget
quote:As "brilliant" as AOC running Amazon off.
This is going to work extremely well
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:24 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
This thread is yet another glaring example of how far off this subreddit is from the the majority of San Franciscans. All of this salty bitterness and rooting for the landlord is insane.
Everyone agrees that the permitting process needs to be overhauled, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the landlords are the crux of the problem here. How many businesses have shuttered because of a literally doubling of their lease without anyone to enter into their old spot? Look at the Crow Bar on Broadway for example... My buddy owned that spot for a while and when his lease came up he had no other choice but to walk. Another bar could have opened there, but it wouldn't be profitable. Meanwhile the landlord gets to write this place off as a loss... He probably owns tons of other spots in the city... It's been vacant for over 10 years.
Take for example the daycare on Divis... $14k a month, landlord comes in at the lease's end and says it's going to be $25k. In what world does a daycare have an extra $11k a month to cover this? That world doesn't exist. Now that spot will stay vacant until the voters' arms are twisted up so much that they either
1). Vote on a vacancy tax that will completely make this process of pure greed not worth it
2). Allow that landlord to open this place up to a corporate chain like Chipotle, which I'm assuming is the game here. frick that shite.
If this vacancy tax goes on the ballot it's gonna pass with a landslide victory, as it should be. Next up will be the momentum that appears to be gaining on changing the permitting process for small business owners. There aren't going to be any supervisors against that once something can be put in place.
Absolute insanity from reddit.
This policy will make running a small business an absolute pain in the arse.
This post was edited on 11/21/19 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:36 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
This policy will make running a small business an absolute pain in the arse.
This policy will make the problem even worse.
It's amazing to me that these people's knee jerk reaction is always to use the force if the state to get what they want.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:45 pm to upgrayedd
An imbecile like mmcgrath probably wrote that manifesto
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
Beep beep.
"We've got a selling something tax. Oh, in that case we've got a NOT selling something tax."
Posted on 11/21/19 at 6:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
If you want to provide an incentive for business growth, lower taxes. Offer lower tax rates on rental income for these properties.
What California is attempting to do is not going to produce great results.
What California is attempting to do is not going to produce great results.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 6:32 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
How many businesses have shuttered because of a literally doubling of their lease without anyone to enter into their old spot?
And why do they double the rent?
quote:
He probably owns tons of other spots in the city.
Does that matter? What is this tax about? Jealousy that someone owns properties or an attempt to incentivize leasing to businesses? Sounds like envy of landlords.
quote:
). Vote on a vacancy tax that will completely make this process of pure greed not worth it
So this is just a steal money from the rich thing I guess. Not really a move to incentivize business.
quote:
2). Allow that landlord to open this place up to a corporate chain like Chipotle, which I'm assuming is the game here. frick that shite.
fricking EVIL RICH CHIPOTLE REEEEEEEE. Rich people bad!
quote:
Next up will be the momentum that appears to be gaining on changing the permitting process for small business owners.
And what will happen if those small businesses *gasp*....grow?
Going to get jealous and steal their money?
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I support this. There has been collusion between area property holders to artificially inflate rent. Many are from out of the country (Russia, China, Saudi, mostly).
Leaving vacancies make the area less safe, and results in a much less vibrant community. Food stores tend be chains and/or serve slop and many “California” type businesses (specialty bookstores, yoga stydios) have been driven out
Leaving vacancies make the area less safe, and results in a much less vibrant community. Food stores tend be chains and/or serve slop and many “California” type businesses (specialty bookstores, yoga stydios) have been driven out
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:40 pm to MarinaTigerEsq
quote:
I support this. There has been collusion between area property holders to artificially inflate rent.
The government does the same exact thing
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. California is truly lost.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:42 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Does that matter? What is this tax about? Jealousy that someone owns properties or an attempt to incentivize leasing to businesses? Sounds like envy of landlords
You don’t understand who the landlords are. It’s not mom and pop’s who saved up to buy a little investment property. It’s massive real estate trusts, and foreigners who make money in slave labor countries (again, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia) and park their blood money here (where they outbid just about everyone who plays by US rules). They don’t need the rental income, so they won’t bother with tenants unless they provide guaranteed, inflated checks (corporate chains/banks). Empty storefronts are homeless magnets- it’s really bad. Let US citizens live and work in their own neighborhoods without paying out the teeth to foreign landlords.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
At the surface, not a bad idea, for that specific type of area.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:48 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
The government does the same exact thing
Yep- them and the foreign landlords can all frick off with their blood money
Popular
Back to top


0








