Started By
Message

re: The most Californian thing you'll hear all day: tax empty store fronts

Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by chadau79
Daphne, AL
Member since Sep 2009
3493 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:50 pm to
I would rent my space to my Leasing agency for $1 a month. They could put for lease signs in it or something like that.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11970 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Maybe you can show us your expertise and explain how horrible investing in California is.




Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

common-sense

Liberals have no idea what this term means
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Vero Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2005
28148 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:00 pm to
They are worried about empty storefronts being an eyesore, but not the shot, urine, and needles on the sidewalk in front of that storefront.
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15749 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:03 pm to
So you think the increases from the 90s has something to do with the current real estate prices? This is also for higher tier homes, not typical investment properties. And lastly, you leave out basic cash flow, which is always in the red in California. Basing investment success solely off of appreciation shows you’re pretty clueless here.
This post was edited on 11/21/19 at 5:04 pm
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42293 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Up next: California government to sieze all empty lots and buildings and redistribute them as they see fit.


Make shelters for the homeless problem.

Problem solved
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139145 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:05 pm to
So increased property values increase property taxes that price out businesses and their solution is to tax property owners in order to force them to rent out empty spaces that are already too pricey to rent out?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140624 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

This is going to work extremely well
As "brilliant" as AOC running Amazon off.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40634 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

This thread is yet another glaring example of how far off this subreddit is from the the majority of San Franciscans. All of this salty bitterness and rooting for the landlord is insane.

Everyone agrees that the permitting process needs to be overhauled, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the landlords are the crux of the problem here. How many businesses have shuttered because of a literally doubling of their lease without anyone to enter into their old spot? Look at the Crow Bar on Broadway for example... My buddy owned that spot for a while and when his lease came up he had no other choice but to walk. Another bar could have opened there, but it wouldn't be profitable. Meanwhile the landlord gets to write this place off as a loss... He probably owns tons of other spots in the city... It's been vacant for over 10 years.

Take for example the daycare on Divis... $14k a month, landlord comes in at the lease's end and says it's going to be $25k. In what world does a daycare have an extra $11k a month to cover this? That world doesn't exist. Now that spot will stay vacant until the voters' arms are twisted up so much that they either

1). Vote on a vacancy tax that will completely make this process of pure greed not worth it

2). Allow that landlord to open this place up to a corporate chain like Chipotle, which I'm assuming is the game here. frick that shite.

If this vacancy tax goes on the ballot it's gonna pass with a landslide victory, as it should be. Next up will be the momentum that appears to be gaining on changing the permitting process for small business owners. There aren't going to be any supervisors against that once something can be put in place.


Absolute insanity from reddit.

This policy will make running a small business an absolute pain in the arse.
This post was edited on 11/21/19 at 5:26 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139145 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

This policy will make running a small business an absolute pain in the arse.

This policy will make the problem even worse.

It's amazing to me that these people's knee jerk reaction is always to use the force if the state to get what they want.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42557 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:45 pm to
An imbecile like mmcgrath probably wrote that manifesto
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
15892 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 5:55 pm to

Beep beep.
"We've got a selling something tax. Oh, in that case we've got a NOT selling something tax."
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14918 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 6:19 pm to
If you want to provide an incentive for business growth, lower taxes. Offer lower tax rates on rental income for these properties.

What California is attempting to do is not going to produce great results.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64500 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

How many businesses have shuttered because of a literally doubling of their lease without anyone to enter into their old spot?



And why do they double the rent?


quote:

He probably owns tons of other spots in the city.


Does that matter? What is this tax about? Jealousy that someone owns properties or an attempt to incentivize leasing to businesses? Sounds like envy of landlords.

quote:

). Vote on a vacancy tax that will completely make this process of pure greed not worth it



So this is just a steal money from the rich thing I guess. Not really a move to incentivize business.



quote:

2). Allow that landlord to open this place up to a corporate chain like Chipotle, which I'm assuming is the game here. frick that shite.




fricking EVIL RICH CHIPOTLE REEEEEEEE. Rich people bad!



quote:

Next up will be the momentum that appears to be gaining on changing the permitting process for small business owners.



And what will happen if those small businesses *gasp*....grow?

Going to get jealous and steal their money?


Posted by MarinaTigerEsq
Member since Aug 2019
1330 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:33 pm to
I support this. There has been collusion between area property holders to artificially inflate rent. Many are from out of the country (Russia, China, Saudi, mostly).
Leaving vacancies make the area less safe, and results in a much less vibrant community. Food stores tend be chains and/or serve slop and many “California” type businesses (specialty bookstores, yoga stydios) have been driven out
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139145 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

I support this. There has been collusion between area property holders to artificially inflate rent.

The government does the same exact thing
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63891 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:41 pm to
That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. California is truly lost.
Posted by MarinaTigerEsq
Member since Aug 2019
1330 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Does that matter? What is this tax about? Jealousy that someone owns properties or an attempt to incentivize leasing to businesses? Sounds like envy of landlords


You don’t understand who the landlords are. It’s not mom and pop’s who saved up to buy a little investment property. It’s massive real estate trusts, and foreigners who make money in slave labor countries (again, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia) and park their blood money here (where they outbid just about everyone who plays by US rules). They don’t need the rental income, so they won’t bother with tenants unless they provide guaranteed, inflated checks (corporate chains/banks). Empty storefronts are homeless magnets- it’s really bad. Let US citizens live and work in their own neighborhoods without paying out the teeth to foreign landlords.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75954 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:42 pm to
At the surface, not a bad idea, for that specific type of area.
Posted by MarinaTigerEsq
Member since Aug 2019
1330 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

The government does the same exact thing


Yep- them and the foreign landlords can all frick off with their blood money
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram