- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:22 am to td01241
quote:
The government shouldn’t and doesn’t have the right to kill its own people
Hmmmm....you wanna rethink this?
Yes?
No?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:23 am to RemouladeSawce
Pretending minorities aren’t a disproportionate consumer of government assistance is though.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:25 am to bignuss18
Leftist are all about disproportionate representation
Whites seem to be really over represented here. Why dont they care?? It is almost like leftism today is mostly just a vehicle for attacking white people
Whites seem to be really over represented here. Why dont they care?? It is almost like leftism today is mostly just a vehicle for attacking white people
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:28 am to td01241
quote:
Like I said it’s really hard to know how much they altered over the years if any at all
I agree we can’t really tell, but there are hints. Democrats are fighting like hell against any voter ID measure. Why? It’s obviously because that’s how they cheat. If they had control over voting machines they wouldn’t care about voter ID.
I’m going to disagree with you on one thing. They either have access to the internal registers of the voting machines or they don’t. What is “partial control”? I don’t think that is plausible. It’s just a hypothesis by election deniers who are stuck on the Dominion voting machine theory. It’s like taking the position on a coin flip that it will be neither heads nor tails but will land on the edge.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:31 am to the808bass
quote:
Now someone will pop into the thread and say it doesn’t happen so that they feel better about the government offing people
I was kinda under the impression most here really supported the government offing people.
Had many argue that the few innocent that were killed on death row was worth it.
This topic is now very funny to me.
BTW, I am anti-assisted suicide you friggin commies.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:34 am to UtahCajun
Are you seriously trying to draw a distinction between the government executing people who commit the worst crimes, which they if anyone have a moral obligation to do since in theory they have a monopoly on the use of force mostly, and a government that is essentially ethnically cleansing its native population who are innocent?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:40 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Had many argue that the few innocent that were killed on death row was worth it.
Nobody wants innocent people killed. Well, except Canadians, I suppose.
Using that as a reason to stop all executions is wrong, though.
If we based our justice system on a zero mistake rule, no criminals would face justice.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:44 am to RemouladeSawce
quote:
The good news is that there may be a treatment that works for the voices in your head soon. The bad news is you'll have to move to Canada
You first.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:45 am to td01241
quote:
Are you seriously trying to draw a distinction between the government executing people who commit the worst crimes, which they if anyone have a moral obligation to do since in theory they have a monopoly on the use of force mostly, and a government that is essentially ethnically cleansing its native population who are innocent
Nope. Not at all. Not today.
Just see a junkie saying government shouldn't off people now saying they should.
Be consistent junkie.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 6:47 am
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:46 am to TDTOM
Lefties never believe they should be compelled to be held to their own standards or things they advocate for. Theyre insufferable
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:48 am to td01241
Check out abortion rates and where that would land if counted.
If someone will cover for Epstein and encourage babies to be killed in the womb you think they don’t get a laugh from killing your granny?
If someone will cover for Epstein and encourage babies to be killed in the womb you think they don’t get a laugh from killing your granny?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:48 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Just see a junkie saying government shouldn't off people now saying theu should.
Be consistent junkie.
Now I am a junkie?
It is totally fine if you dont agree with my opinions, I post things on this website all the time that tons of people disagree with.
To go to ad hominems because I take medications in the legal and proper way due to issues sustained in combat is pretty low. Especially considering I have a masters degree from UGA and even if you dont like the things I post I am usually very thorough in explaining my philosophical underpinnings for why I believe them.
In short if I am a junkie then im an extremely rare high functioning one
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 6:49 am
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:54 am to td01241
quote:
Now I am a junkie? ? ?
It is totally fine if you dont agree with my opinions, I post things on this website all the time that tons of people disagree with.
To go to ad hominems because I take medications in the legal and proper way due to issues sustained in combat is pretty low. Especially considering I have a masters degree from UGA and even if you dont like the things I post I am usually very thorough in explaining my philosophical underpinnings for why I believe them.
In short if I am a junkie then im an extremely rare high functioning one
This is ironic.
I have more evidence of you being a junkie, by your own admission, than you do of anyone in this thread of being a leftist, a commie, or whatever.
Still, did not stop you from making those attacks.
Funny baw. Funny.
Wish people could be consistent.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:57 am to UtahCajun
That certainly is a take.
I call people what they are based on the moral, philosophical, and inherently political underpinnings of the things they voluntarily decide to post on this website.
You could say this about me I totally admit insofar as you wish to call me a junkie. But again im an extremely high functioning one who almost certainly has accomplished far far more than you in my life so your opinion is of almost no importance to me
I call people what they are based on the moral, philosophical, and inherently political underpinnings of the things they voluntarily decide to post on this website.
You could say this about me I totally admit insofar as you wish to call me a junkie. But again im an extremely high functioning one who almost certainly has accomplished far far more than you in my life so your opinion is of almost no importance to me
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:58 am to SallysHuman
quote:
If we based our justice system on a zero mistake rule, no criminals would face justice.
Never, would I argue for that.
quote:
Nobody wants innocent people killed. Well, except Canadians, I suppose.
Using that as a reason to stop all executions is wrong, though.
But by knowing innocent people are indeed killed on death row here and you have no intention of stopping that, means yeah...you kinda do want innocent people killed.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:58 am to uziyourillusion
quote:
Quadriplegics =\= the blind
FIFY
WTF! Blind people can still live a very productive, happy, and useful life.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 6:59 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Wish people could be consistent.
Death should be used as a punishment. Not to take innocent life. I find that very consistent.
Assistance in dying has a slippery slope problem. I think most people would agree that someone at end stage terminal disease should be able to access high dose morphine on their own terms.
That's less true for the poor person on disability that is unable to find timely or effective care. It is less true for a SAD 23yr old with partial blindness.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:00 am to td01241
quote:
I call people what they are based on the moral, philosophical, and inherently political underpinnings of the things they voluntarily decide to post on this website
Hmmmm....
quote:
But again im an extremely high functioning one who almost certainly has accomplished far far more than you in my life
Care to rethink the top or you just really good with being a hypocrit?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:02 am to UtahCajun
No.
Because I guess I need to say it again, your opinion of my status of being a "junkie" is incredibly unimportant. Youre not someone I respect, I have no idea who you are, and I am extremely happy with my life, my wife, and my career success.
Why would I give a single frick what you think?
Because I guess I need to say it again, your opinion of my status of being a "junkie" is incredibly unimportant. Youre not someone I respect, I have no idea who you are, and I am extremely happy with my life, my wife, and my career success.
Why would I give a single frick what you think?
Popular
Back to top


0



