re: The Location of the Shooter of the 1st shot can be inarguably found

quote:

---

Bret Weinstein is one of the highest IQ people in American public life and my rationale is that if he believes John Cullen solved the Las Vegas shooting and if BW thinks that John Cullen's theories here make sense, I have a hard time taking that PLUS my initial agreement with John Cullen's explanation and tossing it in the trash for your analysis. I've tried to understand your reasons and I respect your passion but it just doesn't make sense to me. That first shot was definitely going left to right IMO (from Crooks / Tree / Water tower towards hydraulic lift).

---

Neither john cullen or Bret also know jack about firearms. I listened to the podcast and Bret never questioned anything. No question about where a BB might have come from since .223 is not a shotgun gauge. No question about debris from a teleprompter that there is no evidence of being hit. And no questions about the statement that a .223 round passing by close enough to clip his ear would "tear his face off" - no wonder my paper targets keep turning to confetti with the first shot - not.

A different day, a different theory.

You are just trolling the shite out of this place.

But you have gotten pages of responses, so it is good for business I guess.

Chad, I don't always follow what you say, but I sincerely appreciate your work and sincerity.

Rather than start a new topic on this, I am curious what your latest theory is on the identity of the dead person on the roof.

Among many things that I find disturbing is the lack of attribution and description of the one close up allegedly showing a dead Crooks on the roof. Who took it? When?

Did they change the angle of his head relative to the roof? The overhead helicopter photo (when was that taken?) and the blurred out headcam images appear to show the corpse face down. The closeup, however, shows the head resting on the left cheek.

Finally, most descriptions of the fatal shot describe it as a head shot (above the eye or just above the mouth). In the roof headcam video, however, the officer clearly says he was hit in the neck:

LINK

24:16 "Clean round through the neck."

If that deceased pic is legit… sure looks like yearick. Bullet hole essentially left eye through back of neck

One thing I find that is hard to get past is the first 3 shots and how distinctly different they sounded from the next 5. Also, looking at the trajectory of the first shot, it’s hard to not believe that the shot could have come from one of the windows. Considering the stage is probably 3-4 feet off of the ground and then with Trump being 6’3’’. That means that the 1st shot, if it had come from the rooftop, would have been traveling downward vs upward. It appears that the first shot was moving upward, as it hit Trumps ear at about 8-9 feet above the ground and then hit the top rail of the stands. I would like to know the height from the ground up to the point where the bullet made contact on the railing.

And they ALL missed??? Riiiiight. Looney toon

Couldn’t the FBI test for gun shot residue at the windows? I guess it’s too late to test the washed roof. AR style rifles also expel gasses out of the ejection port so would there be GSR in the room?

Where were the two wounded men sitting? Behind Trump on his R or L? L bleachers or R? How high in the bleachers? Where on their bodies?

quote:

---

If the hit spot on bleachers is higher than Trump’s ear then it has to be some sort of elevated type trajectory

---

Correct, meaning the shot came from closer to the ground traveling upward vs from the rooftop, probably 12-13 ft, traveling downward. When you take that into account and the distinct sounds of the first 3 rounds vs the next 5, it makes you wonder if the 2nd gunman theory is accurate.

The only other thing I can think of, that might have caused the variation in sound, is the shooter on the roof took the first 3 shots in the prone position and then stood up or was on a knee for the next 5 and the gun against the roof stifled the sound vs standing up, creating a greater echo. This still wouldn’t explain the trajectory of the first shot.

Also, not to mention, it doesn’t help that the video shows the guy counting 5 bullet casings initially and then 20 minutes later counting 8. That definitely won’t put the conspiracy theories to rest.

quote:

---

What do you make of the state police moving Corey's obviously lifeless body away from the murder scene without doing any forensics?

---

Maybe just good intentions not great idea but don’t think that was a deliberate malfeasance.