- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Injunction Strategy used by so many lower courts is neutered. It is about time.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 6/26/26 at 12:18 pm
At some point, lower court judges who defy SCOTUS decisions must be held accountable.
let me tell you what "the courts cannot stop it" means when SCOTUS says it.. because I'm sure most people don't know..
it means the Ninth Circuit is done..
for years the Ninth Circuit blocked every TPS termination.. every metering policy.. every turnback order.. judges in San Francisco and D.C. issued injunctions the same week DHS tried to enforce anything..
that was the strategy.. not the law.. the injunctions..
on June 25, 2026.. SCOTUS ruled 6-3 in two separate cases.. same day.. same margin.. both times..
case one: federal courts generally cannot review TPS termination decisions.. Kristi Noem's calls are now shielded.. no more injunction shopping..
case two: if you're standing in Mexico you have not "arrived in the United States" under federal law.. no right to apply for asylum.. no mandatory inspection.. no foothold..
and here's what nobody wants to say out loud..
350,000 Haitian TPS holders are now in deportation proceedings with no court able to pause it.. every asylum seeker at every port of entry along 2,000 miles of border is now legally turnable before they take one step onto US soil..
the metering policy was blocked for nearly a decade.. it's back today with Supreme Court backing..
this is the same playbook that ended in 1954 when the court finally gave the executive branch back its immigration authority.. and it took 30 years of litigation to get there..
"the courts cannot stop it" doesn't mean Trump won a policy fight.. it means the legal infrastructure the other side built to slow enforcement for years just got ruled unconstitutional..
two rulings.. one day.. zero injunctions left standing.
I'll share more updates shortly. Turn on notifications, this is very important.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. let me tell you what "the courts cannot stop it" means when SCOTUS says it.. because I'm sure most people don't know..
it means the Ninth Circuit is done..
for years the Ninth Circuit blocked every TPS termination.. every metering policy.. every turnback order.. judges in San Francisco and D.C. issued injunctions the same week DHS tried to enforce anything..
that was the strategy.. not the law.. the injunctions..
on June 25, 2026.. SCOTUS ruled 6-3 in two separate cases.. same day.. same margin.. both times..
case one: federal courts generally cannot review TPS termination decisions.. Kristi Noem's calls are now shielded.. no more injunction shopping..
case two: if you're standing in Mexico you have not "arrived in the United States" under federal law.. no right to apply for asylum.. no mandatory inspection.. no foothold..
and here's what nobody wants to say out loud..
350,000 Haitian TPS holders are now in deportation proceedings with no court able to pause it.. every asylum seeker at every port of entry along 2,000 miles of border is now legally turnable before they take one step onto US soil..
the metering policy was blocked for nearly a decade.. it's back today with Supreme Court backing..
this is the same playbook that ended in 1954 when the court finally gave the executive branch back its immigration authority.. and it took 30 years of litigation to get there..
"the courts cannot stop it" doesn't mean Trump won a policy fight.. it means the legal infrastructure the other side built to slow enforcement for years just got ruled unconstitutional..
two rulings.. one day.. zero injunctions left standing.
I'll share more updates shortly. Turn on notifications, this is very important.
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 1:50 pm
6
Posted on 6/26/26 at 1:48 pm to Timeoday
I would be more surprised to see them stop trying than to see them simply redirect and try something like injunctions based on some other grounds but which have essentially the same result.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 1:54 pm to Bard
quote:
I would be more surprised to see them stop trying than to see them simply redirect and try something like injunctions based on some other grounds but which have essentially the same result.
It is too bad the money is so prevalent. I would love to know how much is spent by the taxpayers to fight frivolity. Something must be done to force the cost of such actions onto the losing party.
At least the days of nationwide injunctions put in place by a lone fed judge are gone.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 1:58 pm to Timeoday
Just waiting for an injunction on this ruling.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 2:02 pm to Timeoday
Without nationwide injunctions, illegal policies could stay in effect for years while cases slowly proceed. It can lead to inconsistent rules across states. It weakens checks on executive power.
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 6/26/26 at 2:07 pm to Timeoday
God I hate these twitter reposts, many of them from this same poster also posting delusional shite like "Alex Jones Says the My Pillow Guy is Going to be Governor of Minnesota."
Yes, Kristi Noem, our current Homeland Security secretary.
Neither of the two cases involved or said anything about the constitution at all. Both were about the meaning of a statute.
The cases are both good results, but the constant reposting of twitter stupidity by ignorant people who just believe anything they read is a bad phenomenon.
because these engagement farming twitter accounts more desperate than crackwhores and equally reliable.
quote:
>case one: federal courts generally cannot review TPS termination decisions.. Kristi Noem's calls are now shielded.. no more injunction shopping..
Yes, Kristi Noem, our current Homeland Security secretary.
quote:
>"the courts cannot stop it" doesn't mean Trump won a policy fight.. it means the legal infrastructure the other side built to slow enforcement for years just got ruled unconstitutional..
Neither of the two cases involved or said anything about the constitution at all. Both were about the meaning of a statute.
The cases are both good results, but the constant reposting of twitter stupidity by ignorant people who just believe anything they read is a bad phenomenon.
quote:
>I'll share more updates shortly. Turn on notifications, this is very important.
because these engagement farming twitter accounts more desperate than crackwhores and equally reliable.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 3:48 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
Without nationwide injunctions, illegal policies could stay in effect for years while cases slowly proceed. It can lead to inconsistent rules across states. It weakens checks on executive power.
All politics are local. Frig all nationwide injunctions from one judge in a district that has nothing to do with my district.
Are you a central government planner?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 4:07 pm to Breauxsif
quote:That is 100% false.
Without nationwide injunctions, illegal policies could stay in effect for years
We did just fine as a country sans district court nationwide injunctions for the VAST amount of our history.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 4:20 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 6/26/26 at 4:20 pm to Timeoday
Bravo !
quote:
Hopefully, this will speed up the process to remove millions of migrants who were previously shielded by “Temporary Protected Status.”
In a 6-3 decision Thursday, the Supreme Court said the administration can strip temporary protected status (TPS) from migrants who arrived from Islamist Syria and the ‘sh!thole‘ nation of Haiti. Given the ridiculous way Obama and Biden defined crisis, the ruling appears to have removed legal obstacles blocking Trump and Rubio from ending the temporary protected status for immigrants from 13 countries, including Venezuela, Honduras and Afghanistan.
Get rid of all of them. Illegal migrants do not have constitutional protection.
As noted by the Supreme Court, there is no valid claim of discrimination that applies to the case because, well, quite simply, the Trump administration appears to be against every TPS designation that expires regardless of the nationality.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News