Started By
Message

re: The H1-B visa ban is dumb.

Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by Snazzmeister
IHTFP
Member since Jan 2015
1077 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:22 pm to
Mo, while I think we share the same position on the H1B program needing to be abolished or at least adjusted to a higher minimum salary that adjusts with inflation, in the interim, the reality is that being a "big boy and girl" is just silly. The entire regulative state of the U.S. is rigged in favor of big business.

What's unconscionable to me, is not even making an offer to an American worker. Particularly since my personal hiring experience has been that once reality hits these kids on what an entry-level position in the industry actually pays, they accept.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2129 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:23 pm to
Laughing about your role in suppressing the wages in our region is infuriating, by the way.

I get it though. You’re a small part of a big problem and to survive, you have to play the cheap labor game. It’s not like a small dev shop could change the way things work.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29312 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Nah, they could just find an H1B to do it for less..


I pivoted from .NET development management partly because of this.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22484 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

I pivoted from .NET development management partly because of this.


Management not immune to H1B.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29312 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:30 pm to
Pretty nice SJW rant there.

I'm wondering where you stand on offshore contingent worker structure....in case you're wondering that's even cheaper than H1-B and is probably where most companies would move if H1-B goes away.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29312 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Management not immune to H1B.


It pretty much is currently in my current AOE....certainly could change though.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2129 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Pretty nice SJW rant there.


I’m far from a SJW. I actually have very little sympathy for people who are unhappy with their situations, but I would love for companies to stop reaping all the benefits of being based in the US while simultaneously fricking American workers.

I do work in tech, and consider myself very well paid, for what it’s worth.

quote:

I'm wondering where you stand on offshore contingent worker structure....in case you're wondering that's even cheaper than H1-B and is probably where most companies would move if H1-B goes away.


I’m not familiar with it. Does it seem like another way billion dollar companies can frick American workers?
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29312 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Does it seem like another way billion dollar companies can frick American workers?


Sure....I pay a company like Infosys 45k/yr to do the job that is typically hired at 60-65K in America....Infosys then farms it out to a contractor sitting in Bangladesh that gets paid who knows what because Infosys won't tell you that part.

All legal and no visa or other immigration docs required.

ETA The guy in Bangladesh interacts with your company just like any other employee other than the fact that his pay check doesn't come from your company it comes from Infosys.

That really screws America in general in forms of tax dollars....at least H1-B workers are spending their money in America.
This post was edited on 6/23/20 at 3:44 pm
Posted by El Segundo Guy
SE OK
Member since Aug 2014
9634 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:42 pm to
frick off. America First.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2129 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Sure....I pay a company like Infosys 45k/yr to do the job that is typically hired at 60-65K in America....Infosys then farms it out to a contractor sitting in Bangladesh that gets paid who knows what because Infosys won't tell you that part.

All legal and no visa or other immigration docs required.


I don't have a specific problem with outsourcing, though I'm not a fan of it. If enough companies do that, it will increase the cost of the service in India and similar countries (already has, I think). There is also a noticeable different in average quality of service in those offshoring scenarios too.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2129 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:48 pm to
To reply to your edit...

quote:

ETA The guy in Bangladesh interacts with your company just like any other employee other than the fact that his pay check doesn't come from your company it comes from Infosys.


It's not the same at all.

quote:

That really screws America in general in forms of tax dollars....at least H1-B workers are spending their money in America.


They also consume services which cost tax dollars to provide.
Posted by Shamwow
Member since Oct 2019
700 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:50 pm to
It’s not dumb...it’s strategic. This is a direct attack on Big Tech and censorship. They likely planned to have a big ramp up of workers for election time working on censoring the billions of posts/tweets/memes/etc. that takes a ton of man power....and this has to be done domestically. Google cannot have their overseas operations in charge of this.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29312 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

I don't have a specific problem with outsourcing, though I'm not a fan of it. If enough companies do that, it will increase the cost of the service in India and similar countries (already has, I think).


I've not seen this....and the company I work for just hired one at a fraction of the cost of a regular employee

quote:

There is also a noticeable different in average quality of service in those offshoring scenarios too.


This is changing because it is getting so competitive at least in some AOEs.

quote:

It's not the same at all.


How so. The (let's call them a contractor for ease of use) contractor sits in the organization under a manager that also contains other regular employees. He gets his assignments the same way (certainly now with COVID) and it evaluated based on the same criteria.

quote:

They also consume services which cost tax dollars to provide.


Right but as much tax dollars as they consume the company pays that much in benefits and other costs that go back into the general economy. This is not the case on a contractor.


The bottom line here (and a lot of companies are starting to see it I think) the contingent worker route is the real route to go to save money over regular employees.

Disney replaced a lot of their employees with offshore resources in IT not that long ago.....same story for Amedisys, a big home health firm, in Baton Rouge.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2129 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

I've not seen this....and the company I work for just hired one at a fraction of the cost of a regular employee


Could be different for me. I'm not a developer.

quote:

How so. The (let's call them a contractor for ease of use) contractor sits in the organization under a manager that also contains other regular employees. He gets his assignments the same way (certainly now with COVID) and it evaluated based on the same criteria.


COVID closures certainly leveled the playing field a bit, even if only temporarily.

The first major difference in that type of worker is the location. That makes networking and team building infinitely more difficult.

The next big one is time zone. Scheduling calls and meetings and such is difficult unless the person in India works US hours. (Sometimes it can be advantageous for them to be working while the US folks are sleeping though.)

quote:

Right but as much tax dollars as they consume the company pays that much in benefits and other costs that go back into the general economy. This is not the case on a contractor.


The bottom line here (and a lot of companies are starting to see it I think) the contingent worker route is the real route to go to save money over regular employees.

Disney replaced a lot of their employees with offshore resources in IT not that long ago.....same story for Amedisys, a big home health firm, in Baton Rouge.


Edited: Probably shouldn't post specific stuff.
This post was edited on 6/23/20 at 4:17 pm
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14228 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

Dumbass those Americans aren’t competing with people that get H!-B visas,
quote:

I refuse to believe blue collar young people from the Midwest and New England can’t learn tech skills and fill these jobs
You're wrong.

H1-B visas are only available for jobs in a specialty occupation.
quote:

"A specialty occupation is one that requires the application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of at least a bachelor's degree or its equivalent."

In addition, the employer must also file a "Labor Condition Application" which documents the employer's required attempts to first hire United States workers for the jobs being filled.

What is hard to believe is how this is anything more than a campaign-inspired move by Trump.
Posted by pbro62
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
11410 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:23 pm to
You are the dumbass
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58963 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Mo, while I think we share the same position on the H1B program needing to be abolished or at least adjusted to a higher minimum salary that adjusts with inflation, in the interim, the reality is that being a "big boy and girl" is just silly. The entire regulative state of the U.S. is rigged in favor of big business.


I agree with you. I was using some hyperbole.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58963 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

In addition, the employer must also file a "Labor Condition Application" which documents the employer's required attempts to first hire United States workers for the jobs being filled.


A perfunctory ministerial step.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45006 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

H1-B visas are only available for jobs in a specialty occupation.


These are jobs that can and should be given to Americans instead. The sole purpose of H1-B visas is to allow companies to import cheaper labor and suppress American wages.

quote:

In addition, the employer must also file a "Labor Condition Application" which documents the employer's required attempts to first hire United States workers for the jobs being filled.


LSU316 has already described how he gets around this.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41181 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 4:37 pm to
I always get a kick out of the opponents of this. Imagine being a company trying to produce something and the federal gov't won't allow you to buy the best materials at the best price to make whatever you're making. That's exactly what the gov't is doing here effectively creating tariffs on labor which, of course, is a tax on consumers.

Can you imagine such a restriction on your favorite college football team? What if LSU or Bama were suddenly restricted to only players from those states? The quality of the product they produced would drop dramatically.


Free markets are free from gov't impediments which includes labor.
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram