- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The great Bret Weinstein examines the Charlie Kirk assassination
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:10 pm
Relevant discussion / path analysis begins at 39:00.
Bret attempts to make this analytical and data driven and remove the hyperbole and emotion.
Bret attempts to make this analytical and data driven and remove the hyperbole and emotion.
This post was edited on 3/26/26 at 1:11 pm
6
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:14 pm to SirWinston
good one, mate.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:16 pm to SirWinston
I think Bret is a good enough guy and I like a lot of his views
But man I just find him insufferable
But man I just find him insufferable
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:19 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
But man I just find him insufferable
His brother is worse.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:20 pm to Pettifogger
I like the way he validates my own personal thought processes. Id have been a good scientist / professor
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:21 pm to Decatur
quote:
His brother is worse.
He's the whiniest public figure I know of
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:21 pm to Decatur
His brother is WAY worse.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:21 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I like the way he validates my own personal thought processes. Id have been a good scientist / professor
Talk to Claude
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:38 pm to SirWinston
20 minutes in and not one mention of Charlie Kirk
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:45 pm to SirWinston
Tyler Robinson didn't do this. There is more evidence he didn't than the inverse.
If he did, the evidence would be 100% apparent to us by now, because the government would absolutely want to clean their hands of a random lone psycho's doings. Let alone the lack of actual proof he did the act.
What's alarming is to watch people buy the media's narrative of what happened so fast that they want to kill this kid without really asking any honest questions.
If you watch legacy news media, you probably just don't ask questions often. That is what I take from this event.
If he did, the evidence would be 100% apparent to us by now, because the government would absolutely want to clean their hands of a random lone psycho's doings. Let alone the lack of actual proof he did the act.
What's alarming is to watch people buy the media's narrative of what happened so fast that they want to kill this kid without really asking any honest questions.
If you watch legacy news media, you probably just don't ask questions often. That is what I take from this event.
This post was edited on 3/26/26 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 3/26/26 at 2:20 pm to m2pro
He was certainly involved to some extent. I think there was a more sinister and professional element who actually killed Charlie and Robinson was essentially the patsy.
This post was edited on 3/26/26 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 3/26/26 at 2:30 pm to SirWinston
quote:
He was certainly involved to some extent. I think there was a more sinister and professional element who actually killed Charlie and Robinson was essentially the patsy.
100%
I agree with all of that. He knew something was happening. So, he knows if he plays ball with them, he'll get some kind of a deal for keeping his trap shut.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 3:52 pm to SirWinston
But he didn’t say anything.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 3:55 pm to SirWinston
Is the first 15 minutes just ads? Good God.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News