- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The filibuster is unconstitutional
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:23 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:23 pm to cajunangelle
Or the Human Nutless Ken Doll could just present this passed legislation to the President and HE COULD SIGN IT INTO LAW LIKE THE frickING CONSTITUTION SAYS.
But he’s Ken, down to the genitalia.
But he’s Ken, down to the genitalia.
1
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:28 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Oh and John Thune is a human Ken Doll, down to the genitalia.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:28 pm to Wednesday
go on..... I haven't laughed like this in a while. I went and searched naked ken doll
Thune....I found temu Obama with a lump. Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:29 pm to Wednesday
quote:
If the President doesn’t like the legislation that the majority passes, he can veto it
So if a democratically controlled congress passes say, a 19 justice supreme court and we also have democratic president and he chooses not to veto it............
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 8:32 pm
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:30 pm to boosiebadazz
No it’s not. The fricking law passed by 53 votes. They are constitutionally required to present it to POTUS. Deliberations are now over
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:32 pm to Wednesday
so you are familiar with John Thune's genitalia. Good for you I guess.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:33 pm to AubieinNC2009
Well he’s certainly behaving as if he lacks any
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:34 pm to Mr. Misanthrope
I keep picturing it and on a serious note no one is really paying attention. every dem, temu Obama, AOC all of them have said the SCOTUS is nazi.
The second they get a lick of power they will appoint 68 justices. So TRUMP IS RIGHT the ballless Ken doll and the Speaker Mister Peabody Mouse need to GROW SOME BALLS.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:34 pm to damnstrongfan
Yup. And we will be right in that situation bc of the way that Congressional republicans have bungled this shite
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:34 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Well he’s certainly behaving as if he lacks any
Hey unlike most politicians I don't care what you and John do in the bedroom. That is y'all's private life.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:37 pm to AubieinNC2009
humor much? he has no balls. if he does he shaves them to sit in the cuck chair. put that in your pipe and smoke it, missy thing.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:02 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The Senate Voted 12 times to open the government with 53 votes.
Wrong. They voted to end debate that is not the same thing as voting to approve the bill. Many times you'll see Senators vote for cloture and then vote against the bill. Each chamber is able to make their own internal rules. They haven't changed any rule about how many votes are required to pass a bill and send it to the other chamber or to the President. Instead the Senate has set a rule that requires 60 votes to end debate before a final vote is called. If you get rid of the filibuster you might as well get rid of the Senate because at that point it's just a smaller house of representatives.
The House could do the same thing and it would be perfectly constitutional. Just because Trump says something doesn't mean you have to immediately run to defend it.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:16 pm to Wednesday
quote:Seemingly, any bill they don't pass would deny the president opportunity to veto it.
They only have the power to override a veto, not create one. Basically the filibuster provides 1 senators with a veto power. It’s not their prerogative.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:23 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Where’s the SCOTUS opinion saying I’m wrong?
In all fairness, where’s the SCOTUS opinion saying you’re right?
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:27 pm to Wednesday
Technically, I don’t think there’s a need to have 60 votes to pass legislation. I believe the filibuster is strictly for ending debate. You need 60 votes to end debate on a bill before there is an actual vote that only requires 51 votes.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:28 pm to MMauler
They’ve voted. It’s done.
So- present it
So- present it
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:57 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The filibuster is unconstitutional
You should probably get rid of it then.
:benstillerdoitgif:
Posted on 11/6/25 at 10:09 pm to Wednesday
quote:If you're an attorney I'm surprised at the petulant way you're approaching this. Your question is on the level of "Do you still beat your wife? Yes or No?"
Where’s the SCOTUS opinion saying I’m wrong?
Posted on 11/6/25 at 10:11 pm to Wednesday
quote:
They’ve voted. It’s done.
When did they vote on the bill itself? It will be online and relatively easy for you to link.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 10:12 pm to Green Chili Tiger
If they made the opposing party actually do the work of filibustering, it wouldn’t go on for as long as it does. The fact they can just say filibuster then go home (or on a trip) is the problem. I think that if you’re going to vote no on ending debate, then you need to stay and debate.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News