- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Fani Willis prosecution of Trump just went up in smoke.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
The poliboard wing will be a hoot.
Its almost all Dems on the poliboard now so I imagine there will be a lot of fraternizing
This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 1:29 pm
0
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:30 pm to JCdawg
quote:
I wish someone like her would go rogue and drop all the info about how the establishment set this up for her and promised they would protect her.
She would suddenly OD on fentanyl faster than she could post the receipts on TD.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:31 pm to NIH
She will have a gig on msnbc, cnn or fox within the week.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:32 pm to teke184
In the immortal words of reverend al sharpton “ y’all are just rubbing salt in the womb “
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I mean, Fanni was already removed by the appointment of the SP.
...you mean the guy she's screwing...the guy with no RICO experience who was tasked to lead this RICO case.
That's who you mean right?
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:33 pm to moneyg
quote:
you mean the guy she's screwing...the guy with no RICO experience who was tasked to lead this RICO case.
That's who you mean right?
Uh..yeah.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:34 pm to moneyg
Wouldn't they just assign a different SP to it?
And put up a firewall to limit anyone else in her offices involvement?
And put up a firewall to limit anyone else in her offices involvement?
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:35 pm to teke184
quote:
“Man’s gotta know his limitations.”
WOMAN, too!
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:36 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Wouldn't they just assign a different SP to it?
I don't see why not.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Like I said, I haven't followed this that closely, and I hope it does go away because its stupid.
But I've been a bit baffled for a few weeks now about how Fani Willis's issues means the case goes away.
I am really not sure that is the case at all. I've seen DA offices get recused from cases and the trials were delayed maybe 4 months or so.
But I've been a bit baffled for a few weeks now about how Fani Willis's issues means the case goes away.
I am really not sure that is the case at all. I've seen DA offices get recused from cases and the trials were delayed maybe 4 months or so.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I mean, Fanni was already removed by the appointment of the SP. Did that kill the prosecution?
I don't think this is right. She hired a special prosecutor to investigate and bring the action. I do not believe she turned the case over to Ward without involvement from her or her office. Fani said three weeks ago that she would not recuse herself. That statement would not even make sense if Ward was independent counsel.
This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:38 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
But I've been a bit baffled for a few weeks now about how Fani Willis's issues means the case goes away.
Again, Charlatans creating misleading content for the echo chamber.
The best part is when they're wrong, they can just blame some random conspiracy/evil entity.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:38 pm to Fun Bunch
The timing of the case is pretty important to the 2024 election, as the entire point is to try and DQ him from the race.
If this gets kicked past the election, there is a 50% shot he is a private citizen and won’t run again in 2028. At which point they have little need to push this hard.
If he wins the election, this becomes a very prolonged legal fight because a state prosecuting a sitting president, much like Paula Jones’ lawsuit against Clinton, means that it gets very complicated.
At that point, the state would have to decide if it is still worth pursuing given the extra scrutiny and the fact that Trump, as executive, can handle materials to help or hurt the case differently than the Biden administration could.
If this gets kicked past the election, there is a 50% shot he is a private citizen and won’t run again in 2028. At which point they have little need to push this hard.
If he wins the election, this becomes a very prolonged legal fight because a state prosecuting a sitting president, much like Paula Jones’ lawsuit against Clinton, means that it gets very complicated.
At that point, the state would have to decide if it is still worth pursuing given the extra scrutiny and the fact that Trump, as executive, can handle materials to help or hurt the case differently than the Biden administration could.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:38 pm to SemperFiDawg
Putin must have helped trump out with that data
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:39 pm to therick711
The SP is still under the DA? Is the motion to remove the SP or Willis?
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:39 pm to teke184
quote:
The timing of the case is pretty important to the 2024 election, as the entire point is to try and DQ him from the race.
I'm really not sure that is the entire point
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:40 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
But I've been a bit baffled for a few weeks now about how Fani Willis's issues means the case goes away.
The Motion to Dismiss claims that Willis and Ward failed to provide documents requested by the defense and that they have an improper relationship. The case could go away if the failure to disclose allegations are true or if the Willis-Ward shenanigans amounts to prosecutorial misconduct. The focus has been on the increasing mountain of evidence that Willis has lied as an officer of the court. I haven't seen much reportage on the other issues.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:41 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I'm really not sure that is the entire point
The official reason for the case is a criminal prosecution.
Lawfare pushed this particular case hard because they wanted a conviction against Trump before November in order to kill his election chances.
If it doesn’t impact the election, it is no longer nearly as useful to them.
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:41 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
But I've been a bit baffled for a few weeks now about how Fani Willis's issues means the case goes away.
I thought it wasn't about the case "going away," but more about them not being able to get him convicted before the election because of all the delays this corrupt idiot's shenanigans have caused.
ETA: Poster above beat me to it.
quote:
Lawfare pushed this particular case hard because they wanted a conviction against Trump before November in order to kill his election chances.
This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 2/23/24 at 1:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The SP is still under the DA? Is the motion to remove the SP or Willis?
Both. In this particular instance, the SP is more like a contract attorney leading this prosecution, not like what federal law considers an independent special counsel like Mueller, Jack Smith, Starr, and the like.
Page 6 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News