Started By
Message

re: The failure of Libertarian "paradise" Colorado Springs

Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73130 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:03 pm to
Medicare and social security are not "sociaism", especially social security.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Unemployment benefits
Medical subsidies for children with rare and costly afflictions
Medicare and social security for the elderly

i'll give you the bolded one

certainly won't give you medicare or SS
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Medicare and social security are not "sociaism",

oh yes they are. they are welfare programs

if they weren't, then we could stop paying into it today and those who contributed would be at no risk of losing their benefits
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43912 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Didn't Sandy Springs, GA privatize most of their govt and get pretty good results?


Yep
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:05 pm to
The only way things work well is with homogeny. Fact of the matter is things only work very well for an extended time when they are alike.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56524 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:05 pm to
We really need to decouple the word 'socialism' from things that are actually 'social welfare'. No one is organizing the means of production along collective lines, it's just wealth transferral. Both are shitty, of course, but in order to make a good point, we have to use more exacting terminology. It's kind of the same shite as SJWs crying "racism!" or "fascism!" all the time.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116698 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

if they weren't, then we could stop paying into it today and those who contributed would be at no risk of losing their benefits


What?
OK, John is 64. He's been paying into SS all his life by force of law. You end SS taxes today. How is John's benefits not lost?

Edit: I think I see your distinction. SS is a from of socialism but it's not welfare. SS is money stolen from you and a portion returned. Welfare is money stolen from someone else and given to you when you have contributed nothing other than existing.
This post was edited on 7/13/17 at 3:12 pm
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
34308 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:07 pm to
Libertarianism is NOT a "run government like a business".
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:07 pm to
i do somewhat agree

what are the main groupings/pillars?

1. socialism - government-run industries (#1 will always be the military/police)
2. regulation - government controls on private behaviors (can be economic or social)
3. redistribution - welfare, Medicaid, et al
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Medicare and social security are not "sociaism", especially social security.


They are single payer social welfare programs. A lot of people take out a lot more than they put in. You can call it whatever you want.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

OK, John is 64. He's been paying into SS all his life by force of law. You end SS taxes today. How is John's benefits not lost?

John is 64. he relies on Section 8. you end Section 8 today, and how are his benefits lost?

same concept

the most creative way the government tricked people with Medicare/SS is calling their taxes "contributions"
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56524 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

OK, John is 64. He's been paying into SS all his life by force of law. You end SS taxes today. How is John's benefits not lost?



He is saying that if they weren't welfare programs, contributions could be ended with no risk to benefits. Clearly, if we stopped paying SS taxes, then you old fricks wouldn't get a dime, because it's just a ponzi scheme.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Clearly, if we stopped paying SS taxes, then you old fricks wouldn't get a dime, because it's just a ponzi scheme.

and the "contributions" made over time didn't accumulate in any fashion and were just taxes like any other taxes (wherein if you end the program, your previously-paid taxes amount to nothing moving forward)
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73130 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:11 pm to
But benefits are capped
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

But benefits are capped

so are welfare payments, Section 8 vouchers, etc

*ETA: Medicare isn't capped, for all intents and purposes (like Medicaid)
This post was edited on 7/13/17 at 3:15 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116698 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

the most creative way the government tricked people with Medicare/SS is calling their taxes "contributions"


I disagree. The govt trick was that they sold SS as taking your money and putting it in a box with your name on it because you didn't have the discipline to save it yourself. And then you get that same money back.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The govt trick was that they sold SS as taking your money and putting it in a box with your name on it because you didn't have the discipline to save it yourself.

well we're kind of making the same point just slightly differently
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:22 pm to
Yeah the point is that SS and Medicare redistribute wealth. Some people come out ahead, some even, and some behind. It's not a government savings account.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465774 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Yeah the point is that SS and Medicare redistribute wealth. Some people come out ahead, some even, and some behind. It's not a government savings account.

oh yeah it's 100% wealth redistribution

i think my generation is going to realize this too late (when we won't receive shite)

you can usually tell who promotes the "contributions" line based on age
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

. I'm not sure that any kind of absolutism is possible, except after balkanization


Well then let's get this party started, fam.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram