- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Dims Didn't Wait Long - Feinstein to Introuce Bill to Ban Bump Stocks
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:52 pm to MrLarson
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:52 pm to MrLarson
quote:
Yes there is and you wont like the answer.
It's for shits and giggles while out shooting for fun. But Alt-Leftist like yourself can't wrap your minds around the fact that people do go out and shoot for sport.
That reason is nullified by last week's events. Sorry, that's the way it is.
I mean I enjoy driving over 100 MPH too , it's fun, but dangerous , so illegal.
This is what I'm talking about, if conservatives don't show some willingness to say "you know what, bump stocks need to go" then they are going to end up losing this debate in the long run.
It's just like liberals are pushing and pushing on the gay wedding nonsense, and they won't even just say "you know what? Go find someone else to bake your cake if a Christian doesn't want to" and they are going to end up losing completely on that topic because of it.
3
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:54 pm to MrLarson
We're pushing the crazies closer and closer to WMDs. this guy could have just as easily entered the concert with an S Vest and killed even more people.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:57 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Banning this wouldn't be a big deal to me personally, but I know it won't end at this.
Yeah, the new fire control triggers will be next
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:58 pm to texag7
quote:
That guys girlfriend must love his 4play
Posted on 10/4/17 at 2:04 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
That guys girlfriend must love his 4play
because he can bumpfire a rifle?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 2:13 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
This is what I'm talking about, if conservatives don't show some willingness to say "you know what, bump stocks need to go" then they are going to end up losing this debate in the long run.
Very self aware post. Dont see a lot of that around here.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 2:15 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
They could have and should have gotten ahead of this and introduced a reasonable bill ahead of the Dems.
No they shouldn't have. No extra laws are needed in this instance.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 2:18 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
This is what I'm talking about, if conservatives don't show some willingness to say "you know what, bump stocks need to go" then they are going to end up losing this debate in the long run.
This has never yet been proven to be the case. The country is largely opposed to any additional legislation adding gun control laws.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 2:21 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
This has never yet been proven to be the case. The country is largely opposed to any additional legislation adding gun control laws.
LOL you are in fact 100% wrong on that .
As you can see, though the spread moves back and forth, more Americans have favored stronger gun laws then favor the same since at least the 1990's.
Now , luckily we don't live in a country where it's just straight up the majority rules, BUT you don't have your facts straight if you believe that more Americans are against further gun laws than are against them.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 3:58 pm to BamaAtl
I could care less if bump stocks are made illegal, and Im strongly 2A supporting. It would take me a lot of convincing to budge on most other topics, but IDGAF about bump stocks.
However, your logic on their why the should/shouldn't be legal is atrocious.
like those toy sticky hands in those machines at stores that cost like $0.50. they don't have a legit use, but they shouldn't be illegal.
However, your logic on their why the should/shouldn't be legal is atrocious.
like those toy sticky hands in those machines at stores that cost like $0.50. they don't have a legit use, but they shouldn't be illegal.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Feinstein introducing bill to ban the sale, of bump stocks, trigger cranks that accelerate a semi-automatic rifle’s rate of fire
Good.
Approval of those measures should be unanimous.
No it shouldn't. It should be thrown in the trash just like all other bullshite anti 2nd amendment legislation.
The purpose of this legislation is not to prevent gun violence, or even instill "common sense" gun control, (What a stupid liberal meaningless term)
The purpose of this legislation is to gain a foothold for dismantling the 2nd amendment and setting a president to later use to further strip law abiding citizens of their right to keep and bear arms. Then and only then can the socialist liberal machine set it's plan into motion for global citizenship and the United States international subservientness.
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 5:36 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:03 pm to AUbused
quote:
Kinda hard to defend in the context of current law.
... now dims want to follow the law?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:06 pm to 225bred
quote:
Support
Why?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:16 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
This is what I'm talking about, if conservatives don't show some willingness to say "you know what, bump stocks need to go" then they are going to end up losing this debate in the long run.
Nope. We are winning as evidenced by concealed carry swept the nation over the last 20 years. Don't bother with some Gallup poll because elections say otherwise.
quote:
That reason is nullified by last week's events.
One event and you're ready to cede freedom. "Hurry, do something!!! Do anything!!!"
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:18 pm to MrLarson
Bump stocks and Trigger cranks may not be protected by the 2nd Amendment. I would be surprised if they were.
This legislation might pass in Congress.
This legislation might pass in Congress.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 6:13 pm to Statestreet
The motive? YOU WANT THE MOTIVE?
It might be this: there are a very few people who are so hateful and atheist that they just want to be the greatest mass murderer and be INFAMOUS.
It might be this: there are a very few people who are so hateful and atheist that they just want to be the greatest mass murderer and be INFAMOUS.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 10:28 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
As you can see, though the spread moves back and forth, more Americans have favored stronger gun laws then favor the same since at least the 1990's.
Why are you lying? Link to your chosen poll. Scroll down to the 2nd table. Only 37% wanted stricter gun laws when the questions were posed this past January. Everyone else wanted to keep it the same or wanted more relaxed gun laws.
The graphic you posted is the third table. That question was not posed this past January. I'm sure when they ask it this month, as they have every October, it will have a higher dissatisfaction than it will this comimg January when everyone has cooled down.
ETA: Got called out, downvoted me. Typical.
This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 8:30 am
Posted on 10/5/17 at 10:47 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The goal is confiscation,
Posted on 10/5/17 at 11:04 pm to sealawyer
quote:
I guess LSU vs aTm (but dats not gunna happen)
Ban large groups.
Repeal the first amendment
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News