Started By
Message

re: The devastation of Helene has laid bare the fricked up priorities of the US government

Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:58 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:


Right here you fricking moron.

Right here, what?

I hope you're not saying that statement is me promoting deficit spending, because I never did

Stating that Ukraine money being irrelevant to money related to disaster response offers no comment on my personal feelings about either.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:59 am to
quote:

I bet he’s dull on an IQ test.

Not quite.

And you still didn't answer my question.
Posted by clacker
kamrad cooked!
Member since Aug 2024
904 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:59 am to
It isn't irrelevant dumbass.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39727 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Everybody has a hand out and, will charge 10x the price.



Exactly. And this is why Elon Musk should be given the job and power to oversee and rebuild the infrastructure of America. That alone would get him a big statue in a prominent historical venue.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42652 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

THIS is a much better argument than trying to link money going to Ukraine as preventing investment in infrastructure, generally.


The Dem agenda doesn’t cater to the auto industry, and they push alternate fuels instead of carbon or nuclear.

That’s the fact of the matter. Their infrastructure plans do not cover what most of us desire.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 9:06 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

It is. Every dollar spent on x is a dollar you can’t spend on y.

That is not a description of how our federal spending works.

quote:

If we spend x% of the budget on line item A, that is x% of money LOCKED AWAY that cannot be spent on line item B.

What budget are you referencing?
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89837 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to
quote:

And what amount of FEMA funding was lost due to this?


The amount sent to Ukraine.

Why would more be sent to Ukraine than be set aside for fema or border security?

Maybe you don’t have a problem with that, but half the country does.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to
quote:

It isn't irrelevant dumbass.

Then describe how Ukraine money deprived fedgov from infrastructure spending, specifically.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
38465 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to
quote:

That is not a description of how our federal spending works.


Because federal spending is broken.

quote:

What budget are you referencing?


The one the government doesn’t follow because it is irresponsible with the belief system that you have. “Just print moar money! It’s all make believe anyway!”

Just because the government likes to ignore reality doesn’t change reality.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am
Posted by clacker
kamrad cooked!
Member since Aug 2024
904 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to
quote:

That is not a description of how our federal spending works.

Oh dear.

Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32066 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:

And you still didn't answer my question.


I don’t even know what your question is. You word salad like your presidential candidate.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42652 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:

That is not a description of how our federal spending works.


People need to understand, we don’t have a finite amount of money. We spend what we want to spend on things we want to spend it on.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:

The amount sent to Ukraine.


LINK?

Tying spending to pass a bill as a political mechanism doesn't mean that you deprived the popular agency from money. You'll have to show work on this one from a real outlet.

quote:

Why would more be sent to Ukraine than be set aside for fema or border security?

Why do you think there is a relation between the 2 spending programs/policies?

quote:

Maybe you don’t have a problem with that,

I've offered no personal opinions on any policy ITT
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:



Don't be intentionally stupid.


He cant help it. He's blind to half the spectrum.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:03 am to
quote:



Because federal spending is broken.


Indeed.

Its politically based, for one.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Because federal spending is broken.


Sure, and that makes the "one pot" argument silly. That's the point.

quote:

The one the government doesn’t follow because it is irresponsible with the belief system that you have. “Just print moar money! It’s all make believe anyway!”

So no budget and no "one pot" actually exists in reality, correct?

quote:

Just because the government likes to ignore reality doesn’t change reality.

Potentially ironic
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
13075 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:04 am to
Thanks for demonstrating you have exactly zero grasp on the concept of monetary supply and demand…
Posted by clacker
kamrad cooked!
Member since Aug 2024
904 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

quote:
Why would more be sent to Ukraine than be set aside for fema or border security?

Why do you think there is a relation between the 2 spending programs/policies?



Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I don’t even know what your question is.


This will be the 3rd time:

quote:

When has all this spending deprived the federal government form throwing out trillions domestically for "every fricking disaster" (to use your language)?


"This spending" means money sent to Ukraine (it was directly referential the first time posted, so the clarification is possibly necessary now).
Posted by clacker
kamrad cooked!
Member since Aug 2024
904 posts
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:07 am to
quote:

quote:
It isn't irrelevant dumbass.

Then describe how Ukraine money deprived fedgov from infrastructure spending, specifically.

So that money went to Ukraine and not to some project in the US, correct?

How hard is that to understand?

Your "infinite" budget argument you got going here is retarded.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram