- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The devastation of Helene has laid bare the fricked up priorities of the US government
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:58 am to clacker
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:58 am to clacker
quote:
Right here you fricking moron.
Right here, what?
I hope you're not saying that statement is me promoting deficit spending, because I never did
Stating that Ukraine money being irrelevant to money related to disaster response offers no comment on my personal feelings about either.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:59 am to BigPerm30
quote:
I bet he’s dull on an IQ test.
Not quite.
And you still didn't answer my question.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
It isn't irrelevant dumbass.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:00 am to FATBOY TIGER
quote:
Everybody has a hand out and, will charge 10x the price.
Exactly. And this is why Elon Musk should be given the job and power to oversee and rebuild the infrastructure of America. That alone would get him a big statue in a prominent historical venue.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
THIS is a much better argument than trying to link money going to Ukraine as preventing investment in infrastructure, generally.
The Dem agenda doesn’t cater to the auto industry, and they push alternate fuels instead of carbon or nuclear.
That’s the fact of the matter. Their infrastructure plans do not cover what most of us desire.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 9:06 am
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:00 am to beerJeep
quote:
It is. Every dollar spent on x is a dollar you can’t spend on y.
That is not a description of how our federal spending works.
quote:
If we spend x% of the budget on line item A, that is x% of money LOCKED AWAY that cannot be spent on line item B.
What budget are you referencing?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And what amount of FEMA funding was lost due to this?
The amount sent to Ukraine.
Why would more be sent to Ukraine than be set aside for fema or border security?
Maybe you don’t have a problem with that, but half the country does.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to clacker
quote:
It isn't irrelevant dumbass.
Then describe how Ukraine money deprived fedgov from infrastructure spending, specifically.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is not a description of how our federal spending works.
Because federal spending is broken.
quote:
What budget are you referencing?
The one the government doesn’t follow because it is irresponsible with the belief system that you have. “Just print moar money! It’s all make believe anyway!”
Just because the government likes to ignore reality doesn’t change reality.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is not a description of how our federal spending works.
Oh dear.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And you still didn't answer my question.
I don’t even know what your question is. You word salad like your presidential candidate.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is not a description of how our federal spending works.
People need to understand, we don’t have a finite amount of money. We spend what we want to spend on things we want to spend it on.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to dgnx6
quote:
The amount sent to Ukraine.
LINK?
Tying spending to pass a bill as a political mechanism doesn't mean that you deprived the popular agency from money. You'll have to show work on this one from a real outlet.
quote:
Why would more be sent to Ukraine than be set aside for fema or border security?
Why do you think there is a relation between the 2 spending programs/policies?
quote:
Maybe you don’t have a problem with that,
I've offered no personal opinions on any policy ITT
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:02 am to udtiger
quote:
Don't be intentionally stupid.
He cant help it. He's blind to half the spectrum.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:03 am to beerJeep
quote:
Because federal spending is broken.
Indeed.
Its politically based, for one.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:03 am to beerJeep
quote:
Because federal spending is broken.
Sure, and that makes the "one pot" argument silly. That's the point.
quote:
The one the government doesn’t follow because it is irresponsible with the belief system that you have. “Just print moar money! It’s all make believe anyway!”
So no budget and no "one pot" actually exists in reality, correct?
quote:
Just because the government likes to ignore reality doesn’t change reality.
Potentially ironic
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for demonstrating you have exactly zero grasp on the concept of monetary supply and demand…
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Why would more be sent to Ukraine than be set aside for fema or border security?
Why do you think there is a relation between the 2 spending programs/policies?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:05 am to BigPerm30
quote:
I don’t even know what your question is.
This will be the 3rd time:
quote:
When has all this spending deprived the federal government form throwing out trillions domestically for "every fricking disaster" (to use your language)?
"This spending" means money sent to Ukraine (it was directly referential the first time posted, so the clarification is possibly necessary now).
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
It isn't irrelevant dumbass.
Then describe how Ukraine money deprived fedgov from infrastructure spending, specifically.
So that money went to Ukraine and not to some project in the US, correct?
How hard is that to understand?
Your "infinite" budget argument you got going here is retarded.
Popular
Back to top



1




