Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The controversy over some players refusing to wear the SF Giants rainbow pride hats

Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:32 pm
Posted by Dawglovertoo
Member since Mar 2026
585 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:32 pm
Is this a Seinfeld episode?

I just heard the Trump administration is going to investigate whether the religious rights of the players were violated because they were told they couldn't wear one time messages on their uniforms yet players were allowed to wear one time BLM patches on their uniforms.

The SF left wing media is acting like it's fu*ked up that Trump is supporting the players who refused to wear the rainbow pride SF Giants hat or who wore them but wrote Bible verses on them.

Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
28755 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:36 pm to
Who pays for the billion dollar baseball stadiums in all of these cities?
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80344 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:47 pm to
Some players just wore their regular caps.
Posted by Dawglovertoo
Member since Mar 2026
585 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:53 pm to
I just heard on the local news one player refused to wear the rainbow pride hat and two players wore the rainbow pride hat but wrote a reference to a Bible verse on it. The two players were reprimanded for wearing a one time only message on their uniform because supposedly there is a rule against wearing one time only messages on your uniform. However, in the past players were allowed to wear a one time only BLM patch on their uniform.

I am glad the Trump administration is getting involved because I think if players were allowed to wear a one time only BLM patch on their uniform then the players should not have been reprimanded for wearing a one time only reference to a Bible verse on their hats.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104586 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

The SF left wing media is acting like it's fu*ked up that Trump is supporting the players who refused to wear the rainbow pride SF Giants hat or who wore them but wrote Bible verses on them.


SF is so far to the left I’m surprised it hasn’t fallen into the ocean.

They are pissed that anyone challenges the local beliefs, which they feel are morally superior.
Posted by how333
Member since Dec 2020
4504 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:28 pm to
Might be time to “take a knee” on the nfl. Again
Posted by OscarTheGrouch
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
5882 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:31 pm to
How bout sports stay out of political and social issues. Just play the damn game in your regular uniform. You want to honor something, honor former players or coaches
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 10:40 pm
Posted by KingOfTheWorld
South of heaven, west of hell
Member since Oct 2018
7809 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:41 pm to
“Who? Who doesn’t want to wear the rrrribon?”
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
6587 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:22 pm to
I can’t wear messages on my work uniform. Then again, my company doesn’t push selective agenda’s. They should just pay a fine and consider it worth it. They can always change jobs, just like us.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
174465 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Who pays for the billion dollar baseball stadiums in all of these cities?

They're usually hugely subsidized by the state taxpayers
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14084 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

They're usually hugely subsidized by the state taxpayers


I think that was his point, wasn't it?
Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
28755 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:33 pm to
Then this should not be a conversation. If the fans who helped pay for the stadium they play in want Bible verses on uniforms then they should be required to allow it.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14084 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


Then this should not be a conversation. If the fans who helped pay for the stadium they play in want Bible verses on uniforms then they should be required to allow it.


I thought I could tell what direction you were going, but I was hoping for a better response than that.

I thought you were going to argue that since the franchise was so heavily subsidized by taxpayer dollars, even though it is a private organization it still ought to function in some regard like a public entity.

I didn't know if you could make that case or not, but since you brought it up I thought I'd wait and see.

I don't think a case can be made, though. The problem is that the franchise doesn't own the stadium. The city does. The franchise just leases it from the city. So it's a 100% private entity as far as I can tell. Get's to make it's own rules.

It's the fans who have the power, though. Play a few games with the ballpark as empty as the Braves ballpark was for much of the 70s/80s and they'll snap back to focusing on baseball and stop thinking so much about men grabassing each other.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14084 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

If the fans who helped pay for the stadium


BTW, he was talking about taxpayers, not necessarily fans.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram