re: The 9/11 Files: Tucker Carlson

Everyone forgets about former CIA asset Susan Lindauer stating on September 23, 2001 that "the airplane hijackings were a cover for the controlled demolition" and the "CIA had detailed advance knowledge of the attacks as early as April 2001".

She was later arrested in 2004 under, take a guess what law, the Patriot Act...lol, acting as an unregistered agent for Iraq, leading to a 2005 indictment. Courts ruled her mentally unfit for trial in 2006 (citing paranoid delusions), and the charges were dropped in 2009...

But whatever.

And about the BBC report? The put options? The assessments of demolition experts? It's dumb asf to think the offical story is anything but unadulterated horse shite fit for the consumption of unthinking masses.

quote:

---

So set aside the eyewitness testimony and photo evidence of actual plane wreckage at the scene of the attack on the Pentagon.

A plane, in this case, a Boeing 757 with the call sign AA Flight 77 took off from Dulles that morning with 64 people on board bound for LAX.

If the attack on the Pentagon didn't involve an airplane, where did the plane and 64 people go?

For your story to be plausible it would require an explanation as to:
-what happened to the plane
-what happened to the people
-where the missile came from
-who shot it and why (given that cruise missile range is what it is the only possible suspects would be Russia or the US government itself)
-how they brought in airline wreckage and convinced no one at the Pentagon (where ~25k people work) and on I95 which goes right by it to notice or talk about the plane parts arriving and being placed on the scene in broad daylight
-why eyewitnesses said they saw the giant plane in question flying to the scene of the attack
-given that the NYC attacks obviously (or do you dispute that as well?) involved planes, why the attackers chose in this case to use a missile rather than a plane that they would then subsequently also need to shoot down or somehow dispose of

---

I notice you keep asking me questions, but you've never once answered a single question I've asked, and as soon as I answer your questions, you just move the goal posts to something else.

Now you just want to ignore the "proof" of a plane the FBI posted and you surely don't want to address what happened to all the rivets that should be in those pieces but have been clearly removed.

quote:

---

-what happened to the plane

---

Don't know. But I see no evidence it hit the pentagon.

quote:

---

-what happened to the people

---

Don't know, but I see no evidence they died at the pentagon.

quote:

---

-where the missile came from

---

Don't know, you can launch them from anywhere you want.

quote:

---

-who shot it and why (given that cruise missile range is what it is the only possible suspects would be Russia or the US government itself)

---

Russia? Most evidence points that it was a joint attack between our intelligence agencies and mossad.

quote:

---

-how they brought in airline wreckage and convinced no one at the Pentagon (where ~25k people work) and on I95 which goes right by it to notice or talk about the plane parts arriving and being placed on the scene in broad daylight

---

You put it in a box.

quote:

---

-why eyewitnesses said they saw the giant plane in question flying to the scene of the attack

---

I don't know, maybe they lied or misidentified it.

quote:

---

-given that the NYC attacks obviously (or do you dispute that as well?) involved planes, why the attackers chose in this case to use a missile rather than a plane that they would then subsequently also need to shoot down or somehow dispose of

---

Don't know. You're asking me to guess their motive and reasoning.

Why doesn't the pentagon release footage from other cameras?

quote:

---

Hundreds of eyewitnesses.

---

And yet not a single video captured by any such witness.

Just a grainy 144p video that took 7 years to release and doesnt show any plane.

People are gullible as shite.

If a plane actually hit the Pentagon there would've been videos of the event from every angle 360 degrees around

quote:

---

I think one of the biggest question regarding 9/11 is the lack of video evidence of an airliner hitting the Pentagon building.

---

Then where is the AA77? Where are the victims?

quote:

---

but people buying a plane flying into the Pentagon is one of the biggest oversights in human history. Its as believable as aliens coming to earth

---

Except for the eyewitness testimony of about 1,000 people, right?

quote:

---

It’s because you can’t. Loser

---

You can't have good faith conversations with conspiracy theorists. They're too far gone.

Everything is proof of a conspiracy, evidence, lack of evidence, videos, lack of videos.... somehow everything works together to prove the conspiracy. They come up with a theory, demand you debunk it, after it's debunked they create a new theory and repeat the cycle.

The theory is never the point, it's the conspiracy that has them. The conspiracy can be believed without any evidence and as a result it's impossible to bring them back to sanity.

quote:

---

built a career on patently false absurd allegations and innuendos.

---

Provide a list of said false allegations.

Also, provide whom you trust for your news.

quote:

---

Except for the eyewitness testimony of about 1,000 people, right?

---

At least hundreds saw the plane, including people inside the Pentagon, people on I-395, pilots in the air watching and tracking Flight 77, military, firemen, policemen, clergy, ordinary citizens...

First responders and engineers on the scene were picking up body parts that were still clothed, picking up pieces of the plane, the black box, and all sorts of evidence. You have to be really on the Kool Aid to think this was anything other than Flight 77. All bodies of passengers, crew, and hijackers were positively identified. Barbara Olson (wife of the solicitor general Ted Olson) called her husband from the plane during the hikacking. Other passengers called their loved ones as well.

I guess these conspiracy theorists expect that the plane should have made a cartoon-like "plane shaped hole" in the reinforced concrete/brick/limestone outer wall. In reality, one wing hit the ground and one hit the building and at impact it was more like liquid than solid plane. But that's physics; probably a bridge too far for the tin foil hat crowd. In 2001, there were no camera phones and surveillance cams weren't everywhere by a long shot - not to mention the quality of the ones that did exist was shite compared to today.

A good college friend of mine, Scott Lamana (USN Lt and LSU grad) died inside the Pentagon in the crash. So forgive me when I say Flight 77 conspiracy theorists can eat a dick.

quote:

---

You mean like the cartoon-like plane shape holes left on the WTCs? The engines likely should have made holes on the exterior. And are you seriously claiming the gas station next to the pentagon has better security than the pentagon? The gas station had a camera, but nothing at all exists with the pentagon? I find that really hard to believe.

---

You think an object traveling 530 mph hitting metal and glass is going to leave a little bit of a different impact than one that hits reinforced concrete/brick/limestone? Just a tad, maybe?

See this is why nobody takes you fruitcakes seriously. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true.

ETA - I posted a litany of irrefutable, verifiable facts. You can't dismiss or argue any of them. To do so would be asinine...but hey, have at it.