- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas: Man Shoots Car Thief Dead…
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:34 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:34 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:Where do you GET this stuff? I posted the statute showing that the vehicle owner was legally justified.
You saw where a thug criminal bit the dust and you just had to run in here to defend him.
Who ties your shoes for you? Seriously, someone simply HAS to be helping you with that task.
This post was edited on 7/28/23 at 9:37 pm
0
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:41 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Now my mom, my family, we all have to suffer and just deal with it
FAFO
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:44 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
“The guy who shot him is a vigilante, not a hero. A vehicle is not worth taking someone’s life, I don’t care what kind of car it is.
I hate this argument.
There was an article years ago where a person who had their vehicle stolen and had insurance. The problem was the car was older and he just put a bunch of money into it.
When it was found trashed insurance wouldn't give him shite for it.
It was their families only vehicle and he couldn't get to work. Absolutely affected his family. He was concerned he'd lose his job because he couldn't get to work.
Through no fault of his own he was going to end up getting screwed.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:54 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
A vehicle is not worth taking someone’s life, I don’t care what kind of car it is.
If you steal my stuff, you are taking the stance that your life is worth less than my stuff.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:57 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Who tries to pull a gun and shoot someone who is holding a gun on them?
Somehow he successfully gets a critical shot in. I would like to know how in the F that happens
Posted on 7/28/23 at 9:58 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Now my mom, my family, we all have to suffer and just deal with it.”
That’s weird. He forgot to mention his father.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:10 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
“Now my mom, my family, we all have to suffer and just deal with it.”
What a worthless pile of shite.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:13 pm to 19
quote:
So they don't even need to be within scannable distance of the fob like Dodge?
frick me.
The answer is simple: Killswitch engage.
ETA: Looks like I triggered either a sorostitute or a transabled rug muncher.
I asked him if it was just the Fords they were targeting and he said he didnt know. So maybe its any model.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 5:26 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Just don't attach MY name to YOUR stupidity.
'Get my name out yo mouf!'
AH thinks he's Will Smith or something.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 5:31 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
lol @ AggieHank
Fussy that someone stole your thunder? I'd have thought the part I quoted was a clue, but you obviously missed it.
Relax. It's Friday.
You'd have gotten away with it without mentioning the name directly. He's got a search down for his name.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:05 am to Bulldogblitz
Duly noted.
I'll be less on the nose from now on.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:11 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Under Texas law, the vehicle owner was justified to use force to recover his property.
Under Texas law, the vehicle owner was justified to use deadly force to protect himself.
quote:the only marginal question is “fresh pursuit,” and the confrontation occurred in a parking lot of the same mall, so it seems to apply.
Sec. 9.41(b)(1). PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY.
A person unlawfully dispossessed of … property … is justified in using force against … to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to … recover the property if the actor uses the force … in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and ... the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor ....
Under Texas law, the vehicle owner was justified to use deadly force to protect himself.
quote:Legally, a pretty simple case in favor of the truck owner.
DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON.
Sec. 9.32(a)(2).
A person is justified in using deadly force … to the degree the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary … to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force ….
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:13 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Question: Would the result be different if the thief was black? I think you know the answer.
He'll be tried for murder
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Just don't attach MY name to YOUR stupidity.
Here’s a little reality pill for, YOUR name isn’t worth two stinky wet shits here. Everyone knows your act. No o e thinks you’re half as smart as you do, and they’re right.
You’re a disgrace to Texas and a typical aggie.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:17 am to shrevetigertom
quote:Have you ever been to San Antonio?
Question: Would the result be different if the thief was black? I think you know the answer.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:19 am to Toomer Deplorable
This is a very Texas news story. Replace "truck" with "horse" and we are right back to the 1870's.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:20 am to AggieHank86
I am from there.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:23 am to shrevetigertom
quote:then your comment makes no sense at all. Racial politics in San Antonio very much favor Hispanics over Blacks.
I am from there.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Under Texas law, the vehicle owner was justified to use force to recover his property.
quote:
Sec. 9.41(b)(1). PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY.
A person unlawfully dispossessed of … property … is justified in using force against … to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to … recover the property if the actor uses the force … in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and ... the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor ....
the only marginal question is “fresh pursuit,” and the confrontation occurred in a parking lot of the same mall, so it seems to apply.
Under Texas law, the vehicle owner was justified to use deadly force to protect himself.
quote:
DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON.
Sec. 9.32(a)(2).
A person is justified in using deadly force … to the degree the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary … to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force ….
Legally, a pretty simple case in favor of the truck owner.
Good news.
Thank you.
Posted on 7/29/23 at 6:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:Yes, I understand that. But it would become a national issue like George Floyd if he was not charged. Speculation? Sure. That’s what we do here.
Racial politics in San Antonio very much favor Hispanics over Blacks.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News