Started By
Message

re: Texas AG Ken Paxton On Election Night 2020: "Have you ever seen that before? Ever?"

Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79809 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

No one in their right fricking mind believes Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes,


I think he may need to top 100 million this time.

And if they manage to pull that off, you’re liable to see revolution in the streets, because NOBODY is going to buy that,
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21852 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying there wasn't cheating, I'm not saying there was, I'm saying that all you posted is not actual EVIDENCE of cheating.


It is evidence. It may not be considered proof, and how much evidence one requires is going to vary, but statistical anomalies are used all the time as evidence.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68133 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:08 pm to
When you have a system with high reward and low risk for cheating and involves thousands of humans,

the odds of cheating are 100%
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

No one in their right fricking mind believes Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes, and yet, you have so-called conservatives on here who continue to pretend he did because their brains are rotting from TDS.

And yet you believe that the single least popular president of all time, the only one who never had over 50% approval rating in office, and who couldn't even get more votes than Hillary Clinton, got over 74 million votes?

The implausibility factor works both ways. It's also not direct evidence of cheating.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18711 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

stop counting the votes on election night?


To be fair. They didn’t stop. They said they were, then sent all the observers and other home, then started counting again.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24918 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Will they stop counting votes on election night 2024?

At least long enough to tape large sheets of paper over the windows. That's guaranteed.

Unless, of course, they tape the windows off well beforehand. In that case, it'll be a little harder to make excuses why counting stops. But they'll still do it anyway and the sheeple will swallow their excuses.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

It may not be considered proof

Fine.

Where's the proof? It's been 3 years of questioning the results, there should be proof by now. I have seen none, just all of this circumstantial evidence. I remain unconvinced.

Yes, it was a fricked up election, but it can all be explained in the context of the COVID restrictions and unlawful changes to voting laws that allowed for more absentee/mail-in voting. There doesn't appear to be proof of any conspiracy.
Posted by DotBling
Member since Oct 2019
2989 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Big Fat Guy


Thank you.

I don't know how I haven't seen this interview before.

We all know how it worked, but he sure did lay it out there, exactly how the "program" worked across the country.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21852 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Where's the proof?


Again, what constitutes proof is subjective. I've seen enough to be convinced that organized illegal harvesting was the difference in Georgia at a minimum, almost certainly other states as well. If you want to deny that you can; some people think OJ didn't kill Nicole. There never was and never will be enough evidence for them to consider that evidence "proof".

You're the only person who knows why your threshold is what it is.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Again, what constitutes proof is subjective.

When they had a physical tape with Nixon talking about covering up the Watergate break-in on it, that was proof that he covered up the Watergate break-in. That's what I'm talking about, proof. Otherwise, your subjective bullshite just looks like confirmation bias.
Posted by Dandy Chiggins
Member since Jan 2021
508 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Can you provide actual hard evidence that there was cheating?


OK, here is "actual hard evidence that there was cheating".
Evidence of GA cheating
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
2378 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

OK, here is "actual hard evidence that there was cheating".
Evidence of GA cheating




There is a hell of a lot more proof then just this but that idiot refuses to acknowledge it. Wasting your time on room temp IQ people. You just cant fix stupid.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2465 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying there wasn't cheating, I'm not saying there was, I'm saying that all you posted is not actual EVIDENCE of cheating.

Can you provide actual hard evidence that there was cheating?


Jeeezus Christ.... This guy.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21852 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

That's what I'm talking about, proof. Otherwise, your subjective bullshite just looks like confirmation bias.


What you're really saying is "You have to prove it to me using evidence that I accept". Nobody can control what you consider evidence, so frick that little game.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

so frick that little game.

You don't seem to understand, it's your little game that's been fricked. I'm just trying to tell you what's required to unfrick it. Why is this even still a thing? We're coming up to the end of Biden's term, what's to gain from pointing out that you think there was cheating? It's a fait accompli, unless you're trying to ensure it doesn't happen again, which it doesn't look like that's what all of this is about. There's no undoing the 2020 election at this point. This is all just a rehash of the same shite over and over, which is all circumstantial and still doesn't provide actual proof. I'm sorry that you can't see the difference there.
Posted by Northshore Aggie
Mandeville, LA
Member since Sep 2022
4762 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Can you not see that ALL of that is circumstantial, and absolutely NO direct evidence of cheating.

this is what is so unendingly infuriating about this. we all saw it happen. we all knew what was happening. it is plain as day why the stopped counting. the numbers are absolutely undeniably fraudulent. but the lefties keep falling back on this "no direct evidence". fine, i will acknowledge that there is, to date, no direct evidence. will you acknowledge that there is a MONUMENTAL amount of circumstantial evidence that ALL points to a stolen election?

and i'm not a lawyer, but even i know that circumstantial evidence is still evidence and enough of it can still lead to a conviction. so you cans just screech "circumstantial" loudly as if that is the final end to the argument.
Posted by Northshore Aggie
Mandeville, LA
Member since Sep 2022
4762 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

When they had a physical tape with Nixon talking about covering up the Watergate break-in on it, that was proof that he covered up the Watergate break-in. That's what I'm talking about, proof. Otherwise, your subjective bullshite just looks like confirmation bias.

so your personal threshold for this topic is "beyond a shadow of a doubt"?
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2465 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:02 pm to
muh "NO PROOF! NO FRAUD. BIG LIE!!!"

Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States:

"NO evidence!" lol
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24350 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I’ve convinced that somewhere between 2 and 4 CST on the night after, vote totals changed for all six states,


You are correct. I was living in Malaysia 13 hours ahead of CST. I am drinking my morning coffee and watching the first returns as polls closed. Trump is leading and then they announced they were suspending the vote tallying later in the morning my time. I about fell out of my chair in disbelief. Most of the US was either in bed or about to go to bed. I was able to watch the returns all night US time and there was a sudden switch in these states to Biden in the early morning hours US time. It was clear as day.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
17975 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

No one in their right fricking mind believes Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes, and yet, you have so-called conservatives on here who continue to pretend he did because their brains are rotting from TDS.

Who?

The conservatives that aren't Trump superfans that I'm aware of agree there was a shite ton of frickery in 2020, but also point out that Trump taking the knee on Covid opened the door to a lot of it and provided tens of millions in funding to do it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram