- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tennessee police in 2022 busted Maryland thug with trafficking 7 women
Posted on 4/17/25 at 4:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 4/17/25 at 4:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
LINK
The previous government of El Salvador was complicit in allowing it to happen.
Ms 13 is international.
You are wrong about everything.
The previous government of El Salvador was complicit in allowing it to happen.
Ms 13 is international.
You are wrong about everything.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 4:09 pm to Turbeauxdog
Jesse Watters just mentioned this on The Five.
This post was edited on 4/17/25 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 4/17/25 at 4:25 pm to vl100butch
Yall remember when Biden said the supreme court was endangering and killing women then someone tried to kill Brett Kavanaugh?
Good times.
Good times.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 4:40 pm to JimEverett
I always thought Boasburg was wrong but no, that was not as troubling to me because the jurisdictional issue was a closer call. It was also subject to review and decided—correctly in my view—by the Supreme Court. I don’t mean to quibble, but I don’t see this as an analogous case because there was nothing as clear as a specific court order being ignored/violated. Instead, you had an incorrect decision remedied by the higher court. That’s the system working.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 5:11 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
A statute is as clear as a court order. The judge is also continuing the case to see if the govt is guilty of contempt, even though his claimed jurisdiction was an error.
If the administrative error with lack od remedy bothers you in the deportation case due to lawlessness or whatwver I fail to see how its not equally concerning in Boasberg's error.
Again, assuming it is truly "lawlessness" that is the concern.
If the administrative error with lack od remedy bothers you in the deportation case due to lawlessness or whatwver I fail to see how its not equally concerning in Boasberg's error.
Again, assuming it is truly "lawlessness" that is the concern.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 6:11 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 4/17/25 at 7:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I dipped out of this thread dismissing it as a troll on X.
Damn if it isn’t turning out to be true.
Damn if it isn’t turning out to be true.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 7:21 pm to TheHumanTornado
quote:
Whether true or false making it about allegations whether proven or unproven is missing the point
It’s exactly the point.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 7:27 pm to JimEverett
“A statute is as clear as a court order.”
LOL, no. The court order said not to deport THIS man to THIS country. Just not the same though I agree with the SC decision—which was not unanimous—in the AEA case.
LOL, no. The court order said not to deport THIS man to THIS country. Just not the same though I agree with the SC decision—which was not unanimous—in the AEA case.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 8:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
He was only doing a job Americans wouldn't do........
Posted on 4/17/25 at 9:38 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You are wrong about everything.
Ultimately, this doesn't matter much because Abrego Garcia should have been deported, has been deported, and won't be coming back to the United States.
But, just to set the record straight, I wasn't wrong about anything, much less everything.
I said I didn't know if Trump had designated MS-13 members as being subject to deportation via the Alien Enemies Act. You've linked to articles that don't relate to that.
The fact that Trump chose to make a Proclamation about Tren De Aragua, but NOT about MS-13 suggests that MS-13 members are NOT subject to AEA deportation.
Your prattling about the former government of El Salvador is irrelevant.
Under its terms, the AEA can be invoked via a Presidential Proclamation on two bases:
Basis 1: "...whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government," or
Basis 2: When "any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government..."
Brief Analysis of AEA
There has to be at least SOME pretend, ongoing relationship between the "invaders" and a foreign government. That relationship doesn't exist between MS-13 and the current government of El Salvador.
This is why the Administration never amended its pleadings to suggest that Abrego Garcia had been deported via AEA. It cannot be applied to MS-13.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 9:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 4/17/25 at 10:04 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
LOL, no. The court order said not to deport THIS man to THIS country.
What was the judge’s reasoning for this order?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:01 am to BBONDS25
quote:
What was the judge’s reasoning for this order?
His mother makes pupusas.
Popular
Back to top

3







