- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:19 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
Banning lobbying is a violation of the first amendment. Clear and simple. This won’t last ten minutes in a court of law.
Ethics laws prevent Feds from working for a government contract for a period of time after leaving service. That’s not unconstitutional.
This could be similar maybe?
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:20 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
I’m not digging for links
Then you are full of shite and talking out of your arse...
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:20 pm to The Maj
Limitations and bans are two different things. Words matter. Trust me, it’s unconstitutional.
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:23 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
Trust me
So, you are saying that they cannot write a law with a 25 year cooling off period that would effectively do the same thing as ban them from becoming lobbyist?
25 years is not a ban but it accomplishes the same thing... So, like I said, you are full of shite and talking out of your arse...
"Trust me"?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:28 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
Unconstitutional.
Carry on.
Why do you hate freedom?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:29 pm to The Maj
No, you can’t. You can’t ban a person from permanently doing something, assuming theyve violated no law, that is a right to them under the Constitution. Temporarily yes. Permanently, no.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:30 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
You can’t ban a person from permanently doing something, assuming theyve violated no law
What if they're a total nutcase and want to be a police officer?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:31 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
Limitations and bans are two different things.
So a 5 year limitation is constitutional.
And a lifetime ban is Unconstitutional.
I’m inclined to LOL.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:32 pm to boogiewoogie1978
That’s appleas and oranges and you know it.
Y’all carry on. It’s unconstitutional.
Have a great day.
Y’all carry on. It’s unconstitutional.
Have a great day.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:32 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
No, you can’t. You can’t ban a person from permanently doing something,
Yes, you can. You really need to do some research because if I worked for the government in an area considered "sensitive" then I am banned for life from working for a foreign government and working for private companies and lobbying congress when it comes to the project(s) that I have intimate knowledge of...
So, tell me what crime did I commit? And yes, it is permanent...
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:33 pm to musick
They'll send AOC to summer re-education camp for this.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:33 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
It’s unconstitutional.
Still waiting on that compelling argument...
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:33 pm to Coastal Tiger
quote:
You can’t ban a person from permanently doing something, assuming theyve violated no law, that is a right to them under the Constitution.
What? Where exactly is that in the constitution? Post the link and quote from the constitution to which you are referring.
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:35 pm to musick
quote:
Ted Cruz and AOC
What an unholy alliance
Posted on 5/31/19 at 2:36 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
What an unholy alliance
Tedxandria
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News