- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tattoo ink exposure is associated with lymphoma and skin cancers
Posted on 4/17/25 at 9:42 pm to Hognutz
Posted on 4/17/25 at 9:42 pm to Hognutz
Not a convincing study. Hazard ratios are pretty weak and leave out many cofactors. In their discussion they admit it may be enough to warrant future studies, but to say its a blockbuster study is laughable. There are many social factors that were not considered, one big one being that twins generally get inked together. Tattoos in general usually carry with it riskier behavior and if twins did not get inked together they may have different socio economical dispositions....being the inked one may smoke, drink and hang out in the sun and the other may not do any of that. None of those cofactors were considered.
The biggest conclusion was that the tattoo would make it harder to identify skin cancer.
The biggest conclusion was that the tattoo would make it harder to identify skin cancer.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 9:45 pm to TigerAxeOK
We might end up fighting for our lives side by side and I don't think you'll give a shite about my ink

Posted on 4/17/25 at 9:47 pm to Hognutz
Good thing all my tattoos are mental.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 10:00 pm to Hognutz
Tatoos>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clot Shot
Posted on 4/17/25 at 10:08 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
No. My opinion my choice. Tattoos are trashy. Why don’t you reserve judgement on those of us that think they are trashy?
But....but..most of the gangs have them, also the majority of homeless druggies think they are cool too.... so they must be!!!
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:07 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Half the MAGAs I know have a tat so what is the point of this thread exactly?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 12:31 am to Hognutz
Pureskin Master Race checking in.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:25 am to JacieNY
Just sharing, no agenda. Lot's of people have tats, including in my own family. If there's any validity or useful information for anyone thinking about getting their first tat at least they'll be aware and can decide if it's important or useful information for them or not. To each their own, but more information may be helpful.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:27 am to Hognutz
quote:
Lot's of people have tats,
Sure do
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:28 am to JacieNY
quote:
Half the MAGAs I know have a tat so what is the point of this thread exactly?
To warn people.
Do you want all the liberals to get cancer or something?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:40 pm to Strannix
Depends on the amount and how well done.
But generally, not for me.
But generally, not for me.
Popular
Back to top


0







