- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court Rules for Trump
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:51 am to fwtex
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:51 am to fwtex
Embarrassing to have the clown court that is our Supreme Court think something is so outraged they go 9-0.
Surprised by Roberts and the Dems actually putting aside their hate to make a reasonable decision
Surprised by Roberts and the Dems actually putting aside their hate to make a reasonable decision
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:52 am to Indefatigable
Yeah I just posted the part to answer YA's question. It was concise and not posting most than necessary fit the theme of the response
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:52 am to Paddyshack
The plan was always to attack the SCOTUS over this and use it. "Its a right wing court"
The problem is they did not expect 9-0. But the dumbasses that eat this stuff up don't care. It's still a right wing/Russian asset court. There is no way their ideas could be wrong.
Jesse Kelly's "The people are the problem" theory is absolute truth.
The problem is they did not expect 9-0. But the dumbasses that eat this stuff up don't care. It's still a right wing/Russian asset court. There is no way their ideas could be wrong.
Jesse Kelly's "The people are the problem" theory is absolute truth.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:52 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Surprised by Roberts and the Dems actually putting aside their hate to make a reasonable decision
Or, perhaps, the institution isn't as corrupt as you pray it to be
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:54 am to Big4SALTbro
They routinely give 9-0 or 8-1 decisions on extremely obvious cases, and this one was obvious.
What CO did was patently absurd.
What CO did was patently absurd.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:55 am to LSU5508
Unanimous. So those state officials who declared Trump ineligible spending all that taxpayer money to do so, now need to be FIRED. Clearly violated the law. FIRED!
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What
quote:
Sorry about this loss. You’ll get some wins soon.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to roadGator
How is this a loss when I thought they'd rule this way the entire time?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to LSU5508
Question for the insufferable, childish, illogical left: What part of "unanimously" don't you understand?
Playground mentality.
Playground mentality.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:57 am to roadGator
Watching the feed from the Supreme Court.
No demonstrators. One lone idiot carrying a sign ...
Reminds me when Spirit got confused and ran into the window of an Executive Suite at an Auburn Home Game. Next Home Game, PETA announced a protest outside the stadium. One lone woman showed. Fans felt so sorry for her ......they brought water from their tailgates ......apparently she survived.
No demonstrators. One lone idiot carrying a sign ...
Reminds me when Spirit got confused and ran into the window of an Executive Suite at an Auburn Home Game. Next Home Game, PETA announced a protest outside the stadium. One lone woman showed. Fans felt so sorry for her ......they brought water from their tailgates ......apparently she survived.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:57 am to Indefatigable
quote:
writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up.
The "national temperature" should have no bearing on the courts writings. Curious what impact this standard will have on her immunity opinion.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:58 am to SlowFlowPro
You thought this would be a loss for you the whole time? Nice.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:58 am to tigerpawl
quote:
Question for the insufferable, childish, illogical left: What part of "unanimously" don't you understand?
“Well, if you want a unanimous vote you need to find another owner.” - Joseph R. “Coop” Cooper
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:58 am to roadGator
quote:
You thought this would be a loss for you the whole time?
How is the USSC doing what I said they'd do a loss?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:59 am to LegalEazyE
quote:
Now the Secretary of State and any government official in Colorado who supported that BS should be immediately stripped of office... for blatant subversion of the Constitution and right to vote in free/fair elections.
quote:
18 U.S.C. § 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.
The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.
Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.
MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS
18 U.S.C. § 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.
Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.
Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.
A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:00 am to UAinSOUTHAL
So they all interpret and agree. Amazing in this climate.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:00 am to SlowFlowPro
Did you not say that the Supremes would say the lower court ruling would stand? Effectively slapping down the Colorado Supremes?
Which is pretty much what everyone who understands how this works called?
Which is pretty much what everyone who understands how this works called?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:02 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Did you not say that the Supremes would say the lower court ruling would stand? Effectively slapping down the Colorado Supremes?
Yes. I just bet they'd use a different justification, but I was very confident they would not rule that the results of a Senate trial had any bearing on this issue.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News