Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Supreme Court allows Alabama to use congressional map that eliminates a Black district

Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:30 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39521 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:30 pm
LINK

quote:

The justices, split 6-3 on ideological lines with conservatives in the majority, granted an emergency request filed by Republican officials seeking to use the map, which was enacted in 2023 but has never been used.

In the unsigned three-page order, the court said that the state is likely to ultimately prevail on its claim that the map was lawfully drawn.

In dissent, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the majority’s decision “disregards both democratic values and the rule of law.”

Under the redrawn map, Democratic Rep. Shomari Figures would likely lose out.



Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104966 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:32 pm to
The merits weren’t going to be in dispute. It was a question as to whether the Dems could delay it past this election.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42952 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:36 pm to
The Louisiana and Alabama maps were drawn up to satisfy courts that said the maps had to carve out a certain number of black districts; thus using race as the determining factor,

Obviously unconstitutional.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14193 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:36 pm to
Another slap down for that clown 3 judge court. LOL.
Posted by uggabugga
Maryland
Member since Aug 2024
5534 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:40 pm to
Can't wait to read Ketanji's asinine opinion.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21242 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:41 pm to
The three typical loons dissenting, right?
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
43342 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Can't wait to read Ketanji's asinine opinion.


"Help me understand..."
Posted by Archives
Member since Mar 2026
636 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:52 pm to
Have all Supreme Court justices always voted along political lines?
Posted by GooseSix
Member since Jun 2012
22751 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:07 pm to
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
25004 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:12 pm to
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43312 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:12 pm to
And Meemaw didn't want to touch it.
Posted by KingOrange
Mayfair
Member since Aug 2018
13532 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:14 pm to
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21242 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:14 pm to
She finally woke up.
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
6228 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Have all Supreme Court justices always voted along political lines?


There are occasional 9-0 verdicts, but they don't get much pub. Possibly more 8-1 recently. I'll let you guess who the lone vote usually is.
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
43342 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Supreme Court allows Alabama to use congressional map that eliminates a Black district


Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
15342 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:31 pm to
Bye Shomari. We hardly knew ye.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38240 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

Have all Supreme Court justices always voted along political lines?

No. The majority of cases are 9-0/8-1.
Posted by wareaglepete
Union of Soviet Auburn Republics
Member since Dec 2012
19168 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 11:42 pm to
MeeMaw has been in a Tito’s coma her entire last term.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram