Started By
Message

re: Study reveals a $600 billion savings in administrative costs with Medicare for ALL

Posted on 2/9/20 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

So half a trillion out of 30+ trillion
Negative.
There are no savings.
The article describes what would represent an add on of nearly $1.1Trillion in Admin Expenses alone ...... every year.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14052 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Please tell us more about government making administration of complex industries more efficient


Lol

Government
+
administration cost
=
no way in frick hell shits getting cut
Posted by Disgeaux Bob
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2016
2833 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:01 pm to
Medicare essentially gives every subscriber $10,000./year to pick whatever Advantage plan they want....and they can change once a year with no questions asked. The 10 grand doesn’t directly pass through the subscriber but Medicare is absolutely paying insurance companies to take all the risk beyond the price point.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30250 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

nstead we should convert medicare to a subscription based pricing model and give medicare folks $X to shop competing subscription offers and then pocket any savings. This would make cost completely transparent and easy to shop and would in the long run save us all hundreds of billions. Competition lowers cost every time. Today providers simply lobby for more payments from medicare and that raises all our cost.


THis is an interesting idea. I'm admittingly ignorant on the health care issues. I'm not an idiot, but it's just not something I've spent much time learning more about. I have insurance through my company, have for most of my life and have been pretty darn healthy for the vast majority of my life so it's never raised much interest in me.

I lost my job in 2016, went through major personal hurdles, and very briefly covered by Medicaid. I had a major fall and required 2 surgeries, and was amazed that I didn't pay a dime. That was nice and all, but didn't seem right. Since recovering, I've been employed consistently and have had pretty good health insurance for the last 2 years though I pay $180 month for just myself. But anyway, all this made me start wanting to learn more.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56260 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Okay. Can somebody explain the math to me?

In 2017 Canada had a population of 36.54 million.

They spent $217 billion on health care admin costs ($817 billion-$600 billion).

$217 billion divided by 36.54 million equals $5,938.70 per capita. Where dtid $551 come from?
this is what should be being discussed. Nothing else matters
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30250 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

I go to two doctors that don't accept first time Medicare patients. The only reason I got on their lists was because my wife who is not on Medicare saw them first and I was accepted on her coattails.


Like I said in my post above, I was unfortunately on Medicare for about 6 months and had 2 surgeries. I have no room to complain about free healthcare, but the only drawback was the very limited providers and the waiting time to see these. I had to get a growth removed in my nasal cavity and I had to have a C-scan, then an MRI, a reading of the MRI and scheduling of surgery, then the actual surgery. Each of these were a month apart and I had to drive and hour and a half to SHreveport.

The level of care was great but it did have a bus station or DMV feel to the clinics and hospital. I was amazed that I was never out of pocket ANYTHING.

Just to add, I'm now back to the workforce and a hard working, tax paying, wage earner that has private healthcare again. This was all during a really dark time of my life and I felt like a parasite being on Medicare.
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 5:33 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

this is what should be being discussed. Nothing else matters

Indeed.

quote:

The US spent $817 billion on healthcare administrative costs in 2017, $600 billion more than Canada

The US population is nearly 9X the size of Canada's.

In other words, CANADA SPENDS 2.3 TIMES what the US spends per capita on Administrative Costs. Put differently for the math challenged, their system in our country would run $1.9 TRILLION.

That is over $1 TRILLION more than we currently spend. It's money which would not go to care at all, but rather to administrators.

GREAT IDEA THERE

LINK
Posted by EYE_on_LSU
San Marcos, TX
Member since Jul 2018
302 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:34 pm to
How do you save what you are not already on the hook for.

I know it’s bad English
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:35 pm to
There is a simple rule regarding health care:

There is free access, quality and affordability.

You can have 2 of the three but the third one that is left out negatively escalates or declines.

Posted by tiger7166
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
2619 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 5:35 pm to
So the champions of waste are gonna get more money and waste less?
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11096 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Medicare is partially administered by outside agencies

First, other government agencies help administer the Medicare program. The Internal Revenue Service collects the taxes that fund the program; the Social Security Administration helps collect some of the premiums paid by beneficiaries (which are deducted from Social Security checks); the Department of Health and Human Services helps to manage accounting, auditing, and fraud issues and pays for marketing costs, building costs, and more.




This is fairly obvious but of course you'll get people to argue otherwise. They think we'll save money in total because of admin costs. Even if true, it doesn't make up for the excess demand from shifting 100% of the cost to the tax payer.
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 6:02 pm
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32236 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Prepare for the downvotes in the face of facts and logic. Nobody on these forums is willing to accept that the government should help the average tax payer instead of the mega rich tax dodgers. Repubs have been conditioned to think for some reason that they deserve nothing in return for their tax dollars.
What is an average tax payer? Define please. Less that 50% of workers pay taxes at all.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40124 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Researchers conclude that this cost discrepancy is primarily the result of bureaucratic hoops US healthcare providers must jump through to fulfill complex billing arrangements


Which the vast majority of those bureaucratic hoops are the result of policies that originated with CMS.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24718 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:38 am to
quote:

Read my responses in the thread you stupid frick


Dang, son.

Rage over nothing. Hope you don't beat your kids for spilling milk.
Posted by Bengalbio
Tampa, FL
Member since Feb 2017
1415 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:55 am to
Had a physical not to long ago, mostly to schedule a blood draw. Spent maybe 5 to ten minutes with the doc. My insurance was billed over $300. The doc didn’t even do anything except chat me up.

I didn’t care as I had zero out of pocket, but why would the insurance companies allow this?
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
42282 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:08 am to
Dang, that can put a small dent in the trillions that Medicare for ALL will cost.

The government may have “lower” administrative costs, but you can get that the administration of Medicare for ALL will be 100x less efficient than private insurers are.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 7:11 am
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14180 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:11 am to
This is such bullshite.

The Federal Govt is the one that imposes this administrative burden on the system by forcing everyone to comply with their mandates.

The cost to implement EMR and track quality metrics to get the maximum Medicare reimbursement alone cost a fortune. This was mandated....among other things...by the ACA.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68185 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:20 am to
They dont. Following CMS regulations is a bear and has to be as expensive as what's mentioned in this story. It requires an entire department of employees to monitor paperwork and comply with constant new requirements.

Guess where "pain is the fifth vital sign" came from. If you didnt or dont ask, you're in violation, even today with the opiate crisis.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68185 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:

The Federal Govt is the one that imposes this administrative burden on the system by forcing everyone to comply with their mandates


You are correct.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram