- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Special Counsel Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:22 pm to bonhoeffer45
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:22 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:That is an argument from someone who supported Clinton?
solicitation
0
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:23 pm to MastrShake
quote:
yes, i am 100 percent ok with this, just as i would be if hillary had won.
i understand why people gravitated to trump, i really do; the country is sick to fricking death of DC politics and the endless corruption and lies and consolidation of power. i feel the exact same way, i completely understand the appeal of an outsider.
but donald trump is not the answer. he is unfit to be president in every possible way.
outsiders are good. "draining the swamp" is good. taking the country back from the government is good, but trump is nothing but a huckster who played on your passion and used it against you, as a lark, just to see if he could do it, just for an ego trip.
I agree with everything you just said
I believe however not many millionaires/billionaires can run with a frick you like mentality against the establishment/DC (whatever you want to call it) and ever win again. the chips are so stacked against you. I honestly just don't see how you could get anything accomplished without dipping your toes into "the swamp"
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:28 pm to MastrShake
quote:
but donald trump is not the answer
62 M other people differ. This is a very dangerous way to think for simply not liking a guy.
Very very dangerous whether you see it now or in the future. Best believe this will turn around on someone who you do believe in should this be the standard set for our future.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:28 pm to BBONDS25
quote:That was a "boom" wasn't it?
BBONDS25
Damn, I wish I had gone to law school.
You are pretty good for a 25
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:29 pm to AU_Right
quote:
Yeah, but does this heavy left leaning biased circus have any credibility? It's like the freaking OJ Simpson jurors
Credibility with whom? Once John McCain and Lindsey Graham call for the Resignation of President Donald J. Trump, will THAT have credibility? How about if the Democrats take back the House and they Impeach Trump, will that be credible?
Except for the people who voted for him, the whole world is against Trump. The GOP wants him out of office as badly as do the Dems. Trump is the Outsider Reformer injected by We the People into the Wash DC Swamp with a mandate to Drain the Swamp. That won't happen without a fight and right now, this fight is about to ramp up with Mueller's Heavy Artillery getting ready to roar.
The Empire is striking back against We the People.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:38 pm to Foy
quote:
How disgusting is it that after years of hearing of the crimes of Abiden, and Podesta and Wasserman-Shultz and Clinton and Comey and all the rest that we come home to the evening news and hear that a Grand Jury is finally empanelled, but not for any of them.
What crimes?
From wikileasks we learn that Adedin had classified documents in her car.
Podesta should be investigated for child molestation.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.
Clinton violated USC 18 Section 793 (f) and USC Sec 18 section 2071. ---
The first in that she gave access to classified information to her personal attorneys who had no security clearance and the second that she illegally retained the only copies of government documents in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.
Comey obstructed justice by granting immunity to those whose testimony could have buttressed the government case against Clinton and others.
Where have you been for the last three years?
I say this every once in a while -- Clinton's attorneys violated USC 18 Section 793 (g)
793 (g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy."
I am guessing they would sing like little birdies to a grand jury.
Oh yeah, and Obama. He would sing to the grand jury about how he enabled all this other scum to avoid justice - so far.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:43 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
but donald trump is not the answer
I would vote for Beelzebub before I would vote for Hillary Clinton.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:44 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
62 M other people differ
65 Million other people however disagree.
Your next point?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:55 pm to asurob1
quote:
65 Million other people however disagree.
They should have supported Senator Sanders or Senator Webb or Governor O'Malley.
So frick them and their ignorance and bad citizenship.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:55 pm to asurob1
quote:
65 Million other people however disagree.
Your next point?
I can't get to a point with a male queef that has no idea of the electoral college taught in a remedial civics class.
You lost. The 3 M votes you tout as a "win" was done by two cities. More so, two counties. The same could be said about that loser's husband who won the presidency without winning the popular vote.
My point is, you frickin lost. Quit your bitching, assrob.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:58 pm to asurob1
quote:
62 Million other people, NYC and LA however disagree.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:59 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I can't get to a point with a male queef that has no idea of the electoral college taught in a remedial civics class.
You lost. The 3 M votes you tout as a "win" was done by two cities. More so, two counties. The same could be said about that loser's husband who won the presidency without winning the popular vote.
Must still sting to know how badly he lost the popular vote huh.
I more then understand how the electoral college works...as does the Donald since it wasn't that long ago he was bitching about it in one of his many famous tweets.
Face it, you're guy isn't nearly as popular as you have built him up to be...in your minds.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:06 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
From wikileasks we learn that Adedin had classified documents in her car.
Podesta should be investigated for child molestation.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.
Clinton violated USC 18 Section 793 (f) and USC Sec 18 section 2071. ---
The first in that she gave access to classified information to her personal attorneys who had no security clearance and the second that she illegally retained the only copies of government documents in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.
Comey obstructed justice by granting immunity to those whose testimony could have buttressed the government case against Clinton and others.
Where have you been for the last three years?
I say this every once in a while -- Clinton's attorneys violated USC 18 Section 793 (g)
793 (g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy."
I am guessing they would sing like little birdies to a grand jury.
Oh yeah, and Obama. He would sing to the grand jury about how he enabled all this other scum to avoid justice - so far.
Nah... they didn't do that. Come on man.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:24 pm to Foy
quote:
From wikileasks we learn that Adedin had classified documents in her car. Podesta should be investigated for child molestation. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite. Clinton violated USC 18 Section 793 (f) and USC Sec 18 section 2071. --- The first in that she gave access to classified information to her personal attorneys who had no security clearance and the second that she illegally retained the only copies of government documents in violation of the Freedom of Information Act. Comey obstructed justice by granting immunity to those whose testimony could have buttressed the government case against Clinton and others. Where have you been for the last three years? I say this every once in a while -- Clinton's attorneys violated USC 18 Section 793 (g) 793 (g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy." I am guessing they would sing like little birdies to a grand jury. Oh yeah, and Obama. He would sing to the grand jury about how he enabled all this other scum to avoid justice - so far.
Nah... they didn't do that. Come on man.
People more awake than you know they did do all of that.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:28 pm to Champagne
quote:
The Empire is striking back against We the People.
Oh, I know. I'm just wondering how high up this goes if they do try to pin some BS on him?...the SCOTUS?...does he get his day with his legal team in court? to point out the obvious bias? or he just get voted out? Never seen anything like this...just a bunch of limitless establishment kooks looking for shite now that has nothing to do with the original Russian fairytale...a BS dossier that McCain got his mitts on (karma), and should have ended there. Thanks Sessions. Whatever happens, all those crooks will or should be voted out when it's their turn.
I've got to find a new hobby or something. This crap is not healthy...it's a habit...walk in, sit down, log on and pissed it less than a minute.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:29 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Special Counsel Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:31 pm to asurob1
quote:
Must still sting to know how badly he lost the popular vote huh.
Nope. Not at all. He won 3000 counties while Hillary won 500.
quote:
I more then understand how the electoral college works...as does the Donald since it wasn't that long ago he was bitching about it in one of his many famous tweets
Then quit your bitching about the popular votes. Many presidents have won by losing the popular vote and it still doesn't matter.
quote:
Face it, you're guy isn't nearly as popular as you have built him up to be...in your minds.
You as in me? Or you all, as in all of our minds?
You people are supposed to be the smart ones. Start acting like it champ.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:32 pm to asurob1
quote:
Must still sting to know how badly he lost the popular vote huh.
Why would it? Trump is fully clothed in the immense powers granted to the president under the Constitution and the laws.
Must hurt to know Clinton had no idea how to craft a winning strategy against the -second- worst candidate to ever run for president.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:38 pm to LSURussian
If Clinton's numerous, pervasive and long term violations of national security resulted in the death of a single American, which seems likely, her flippant comment, "What difference does it make now?" should be matched by the snap of bone.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:41 pm to AU_Right
quote:
I know. I'm just wondering how high up this goes if they do try to pin some BS on him?...the SCOTUS?
The Supreme Court is completely without power to act upon the president.
Page 10 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News