- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Special counsel asks Supreme Court to rule quickly whether Trump can be prosecuted
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:24 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:24 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
I hope so. This way we can get a real conservative like Desantis as the nominee
1
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:26 pm to Fun Bunch
And you still won’t vote for Trump after primary’s. Nobody buys your shite with how bad your TDS is.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:31 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
You are a mental giant 
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:33 pm to Gifman
awe, did Trump rub some sand in your vagina too!
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:33 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
You liked the dude. Lol , you are a joke
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:37 pm to Indefatigable
bullshite
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:38 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
I am not sure of the DC case but from what I read on the Miami case I don't see how he avoids a conviction on at least some of the charges.
This case is not being tried in Miami, it is being tried in Fort Pierce. The jury will be drawn from Highlands, Okeechobee, Indian River, St. Lucie, and Martin counties.
When I lived is South Florida, I worked a lot in those counties. They are conservative. I can see a hung jury easily occurring if not acquittal.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:38 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
U never were for Trump stop your bullshite. More shite comes out your mouth then a cow pasture
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:43 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Smith trying to rush the judicial process and skip the appellate court, screams Political prosecution more than anything else. This is confirmed Political Prosecution!
Exactly. Smith's prosecution is using a novel legal theory. Yet he assumes SCOTUS is going to rule on something that has not even happened? If SCOTUS is not political, SCOTUS does nothing.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:47 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Smith trying to rush the judicial process and skip the appellate court, screams Political prosecution more than anything else. This is confirmed Political Prosecution!
The only reason tj rush it is to impact the election.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:51 pm to moneyg
quote:
The only reason tj rush it is to impact the election.
I think the electorate deserves to know if he can be prosecuted for this or if he has absolute immunity before we vote. The only reason to delay this is Trump is hoping to win and pardon himself. Let’s be honest in that being the play.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:54 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Let’s be honest
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:57 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Are you an attorney or do you just draft fan fiction?
So-
1) The SCOTUS did grant expedited consideration of the writ, so there’s a chance that this matter will be considered and reversed, bc why the hell else would they grant writs;
2) last I checked I can be sanctioned for filing pleadings with no basis in law. I’d imagine the sanctions should be worse for a federal prosecutor. Good luck appearing in Federal Court if you engaged in a prosecution in order to throw a presidential election.
3) the SCOTUS has granted writs in one of the J6 cases pertaining to the impartiality of the jury pool and on 8th amendment grounds regarding sentencing, and even whether the J6ers “obstructed an official proceeding” as intended by Congress
So lawyers probably smarter than me and you have drafted these arguments in less colorful fashion. And the Supreme Court, full of other lawyers who are probably smarter than me (with the exception of Soltamayor who isn’t smarter than most ppl who regularly posts on this board), have found them worth a second look.
4) calling these legal arguments “fan fiction” is probably a stretch
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:03 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Let’s be honest in that being the play
Let’s be honest that being able to prosecute a president is the play. It makes a man want to roll out of his chair laughing that the special counsel for the DOJ, who filed charges against POTUS Trump, does not know if he had the right to do it.
I think the play by SCOTUS will suggest to Jack Smith that he go pound sand.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 7:44 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Supreme Court granted Cert. Trumps team is due a reply memo next Wednesday
You seem excited.
I wonder why that is?
Posted on 12/12/23 at 7:45 am to deltaland
quote:
I hope so. This way we can get a real conservative like Desantis as the nominee
…not the strategy.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I know you want desperately to blame the massive L in November 2024 on anyone but yourself though.
and then
quote:
The L will rest upon
The people that nominated the person that lost.
You accuse me of wanting to place blame in the same thread where you place blame.
This isn't complicated.
The people who would be to blame for Trump not winning will be people who don't vote fore Trump.
The people who would be to blame for Desantis not winning the primary will be people who don't vote for Desantis.
Trying to avoid that criticism is absurd.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 12:41 pm to Timeoday
It is in the best interest for everyone for the SCOTUS to handle this now. If this goes through the lower courts, it will not be resolved by November. If one lower court rules in favor of either side, the other side will go ballistic asking the SCOTUS for an emergency intervention before November.
You also have the current administration that can also make the same claims that Presidents are immune from prosecution, which can set up a crisis before the next election.
You also have the current administration that can also make the same claims that Presidents are immune from prosecution, which can set up a crisis before the next election.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I guess you should probably just read the indictment if you want to know what the charges are.
Probably as legit as a Russian dossier.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 7:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Shouldn’t everyone want this to run a normal appeals course in the courts?
When you know that the intermediate appellate level will be appealed, then no. It's literally pointless if the superior appellate level advises it will accept writs on the case.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News