Started By
Message

Special counsel asks Supreme Court to rule quickly whether Trump can be prosecuted

Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:14 pm
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:14 pm
Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to take up and rule quickly on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election results.

A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but the Republican former president signaled he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington to reverse that outcome.

Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court. The request filed Monday for the Supreme Court to take up the matter directly reflects Smith’s desire to keep the trial, currently for March 4, on track and to prevent any delays that could push back the case until after next year’s presidential election.

“This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin,” prosecutors wrote.

Underscoring the urgency for prosecutors in securing a quick resolution that can push the case forward, they wrote: “It is of imperative public importance that respondent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this Court and that respondent’s trial proceed as promptly as possible if his claim of immunity is rejected.”


“Former Presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability,” Chutkan wrote. “Defendant may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office.”


LINK
Posted by Gifman
by the mountains
Member since Jan 2021
9242 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:16 pm to
For once, I agree with Jack Smith.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79626 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:18 pm to
Gee. What’s your hurry, Jack?
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

What’s your hurry, Jack?


I think he's trying his best to give the GOP time to find a new candidate quick.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14344 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

I think he's trying his best to give the GOP time to find a new candidate quick.





Posted by Elblancodiablo
Member since Sep 2023
1829 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

I think he's trying his best to give the GOP time to find a new candidate quick.

Don't need one
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7719 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:35 pm to
boomerang will a be mutha fricka
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 12:36 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48188 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

think he's trying his best to give the GOP time to find a new candidate quick.


the last time he went to the Supreme Court because he prosecuted a political enemy he got slapped down hard. They should do the same here, but this is Trump, so I could see Robert’s wussing out.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56405 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

I think he's trying his best to give the GOP time to find a new candidate quick.


Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79626 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:42 pm to
What are the chances they tell him to let the Appeal Court process play out first? Is Jack afraid of what they might say?
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10967 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:46 pm to
Hit the road, Jack.

And don’t come back no more…
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4313 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Don't need one



You will, unless you believe that the justice system in this country will treat Trump fairly.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:51 pm to
Somewhere out there, SanctimoniousHank is DYING to derail this thread and call you all idiots...
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

unless you believe that the justice system in this country will treat Trump fairly.


He's gotten FAR better treatment that 99.9% of Americans would in Court.
We would ALL be in jail by now. lol
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 12:54 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:53 pm to
Of course fairly in your mind is acquitting Trump.

I am not sure of the DC case but from what I read on the Miami case I don't see how he avoids a conviction on at least some of the charges. His ego got his arse in trouble there.

The NY civil case is clearly BS to me.

The Atlanta case I am not sure of.
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4313 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Is Jack afraid of what they might say?



Seems unlikely. They know that Trump's best strategy is to delay this as long as possible, hope Trump wins in November and then pardons himself. So Jack is just trying to speed this up by skipping a normal step. Jack has worked out the timing perfectly. Trial date before Super Tuesday, to ensure Trump wins the nomination. Conviction before the convention, sentencing after.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9131 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:54 pm to
I don't understand how the Supreme Court could rule on anything yet.
Trump hasn't been convicted of or charged with insurrection or rebellion!

Am I missing something? (I'm aware of the insane blood lust the dems have to "get Trump")

Also, Smith's record presenting cases to the SCOTUS isn't very good. lol
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 12:57 pm
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

He's gotten FAR better treatment that 99.9% of Americans would in Court.
We would ALL be in jail by now. lol


The Biden Crime Family says "potato"....
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4313 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I don't understand how the Supreme Court could rule on anything yet.
Trump hasn't been convicted of or charged with insurrection or rebellion!



Trump's lawyers have argued that Trump has immunity in this particular case. They moved to dismiss the case and were denied by a Federal District judge. Next they'll appeal to the Circuit court, if they lose, they'll appeal to the Supreme Court. Jack is just trying to skip the Circuit court.

LINK

quote:

Federal judge says Trump does not have absolute immunity, denying bid to dismiss election subversion case


quote:

The federal judge presiding over Donald Trump’s election subversion case in Washington, DC, has refused to dismiss the charges against the former president, saying he does not enjoy absolute immunity for what he said and did after the 2020 election.

“The court cannot conclude that our Constitution cloaks former Presidents with absolute immunity for any federal crimes they committed while in office,” US District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote.

This is an issue that likely must be settled by an appeals courts above Chutkan before Trump’s criminal trial, set for March.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26079 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

What are the chances they tell him to let the Appeal Court process play out first?

I don’t think very high. Seems to me that SCOTUS would want to go ahead and put this issue to rest before the election season.

Pretty reasonable honestly. I hope they do go ahead and address it. It’ll end up before SCOTUS regardless of what the DC circuit did anyway.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 1:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram