re: Sounds like the Obama FBI RICO trials will happen in Florida not DC

quote:

---

Listen to Tulsi carefully in the video I just posted.

---

So, understand that what you’re asking is for me to trust the narrative of someone who just framed something that was quite literally also stated on the page one table of contents in the 5 year old senate report… as being a bombshell revelation.

I will trust the results of an investigation if they bring one. Volume IV is not likely to be redacted any time soon because it largely concerns vulnerabilities to domestic infrastructure.

There wasn’t quite enough evidence to
indict Trump as part of a conspiracy (often referred to by the legally meaningless term of collusion), but there was plenty of evidence of Russian
attempts to interfere.
Besides the internet hacks, you’ll remember Don, Jr. meeting with a Russian delegation at Trump Tower. They claimed they talked about Russian adoption (yeah, right) but Trump, Sr. said on camera that it was “opposition
research” lol.

quote:

---

DeathbyItrustintelagenciesthatlie putting in work.

---

Just going to re-post this from now on. Point to the lie please:

This is page one, volume I of the senate intelligence committee’s five-volume 2020 report & was never redacted.



This says the exact same thing as ODNI’s “bombshell”, does it not?

The intelligence reports cover Russian motives, methods, disinfo campaigns, hacking voter rolls (7th line in the image pg 22), feeding or claiming possession of false intelligence to Republican campaign officials, Manafort providing a Russian agent (who he formerly worked with on behalf of Putin in Ukraine) with US polling data (volume V), etc.

HRC is a ball of slime, and she went on and on about Trump being an “illegitimate president” in her media appearances… But I’ve no idea where people got the impression any actual investigations or intelligence reports ever at any point depended on concluding that Russia manipulated vote counts.

Intelligence doesn’t speculate on whether any of this affected election results & it’s all more concerned with national security than domestic politics.

Full senate report is generally an interesting read.

I realize no one is going to read all of it, but the volumes are well outlined/indexed & all conclusions are right here at your fingertips. Rothschilds etc. The only volume over 100 pages is volume V (1000 pages).

ODNI’s declassifieds were still heavily redacted. If it’s all fake, none of it should be sensitive.

One more time Corky. Where did the Intel come from?

The same agencies that amended pdb to make muh Russians look sinister the same agencies that leaked that garbage data to the press?
The same 51 Intel experts vouched data.

Yeah sorry not going to buy the data they supplied to a Senate investigation or anywhere else.

I'm really fine, baw, but thanks for your concern.

quote:

---

There are literally documents from Obama's administration showing that there was no credible evidence, yet you still want to believe it. You are braindead.

---

There was never any evidence of voting machines being hacked, votes changed, etc., which is what Gabbard is actually talking about. No one outside of random cranks on the Internet have ever claimed that though. Gabbard would like you to ignore what the GRU did.

Lol the pdb was changed to fit the narrative Obama wanted to push. After that it was bullshite.

Fed by the Intel agencies you want to trust.

Wtf are you babbling about votes.

I am talking about the actions of Obama and more to the point the Intel assholes you trust completely

quote:

---

I am talking about the actions of Obama and more to the point the Intel assholes you trust completely

---

What part of the intel?

Can you demonstrate any part of what I have posted is false?

You’re saying distrust the Mueller report, the unanimous 1500 page senate review, Ratcliffe’s investigation — but trust a narrative that relies on a line that doesn’t even contradict any of the intelligence?

To be clear, this is in fact what exactly what you are saying.