Started By
Message

re: Son, age 10, on scheduled agenda to eventually be chemically casterated

Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:21 am to
Posted by LaMigra
Member since Nov 2022
2767 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Fake news. If it sounds made up it probably is. This is just like ya'll dominion machine bull crap.


Thanks for outing yourself as a dumb liberal groomer!!

Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17418 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:24 am to
quote:

This is a horrible story, and it’s shocking we’ve degraded so far as a society. Many people no longer have the ability to discern right from wrong.



Just look at the comments from mmcgrath and that boxcar guy and it's easy to see how we have degraded so badly. They have allowed ideology to completely overcome any sense of reason or decency they may have had
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
9249 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:25 am to
quote:

The guy obviously did something to lose custody and unsupervised visits. You should think twice about going to bat for him.


Maybe, just maybe both parents are trash and the "system" should lookout for the kid.
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:28 am to
quote:

The Judge should be removed from office and the Mom should be institutionalized, period.


And that's what the TX govt needs to figure out how to stop these rouge judges like rouge DAs. TX has lost a lot of conservative cred over them ignoring this child sexual transitioning topic. It's been going on too long and ruining lives of their children.

And let's not forget the mom is a Pediatrician. Apparently one of her reasons for moving to LA was due to her practice getting hurt by the "transphobic" group. The dad said he only knows they are in LA county, and suspects she is working at a transition clinic.

In the Berry interview, he goes into detail about her mega-feminist family upbringing. I caught the back end of that segment, so don't know the setup details to stuff I heard but what I did hear sounded crazy. Stuff like his her sister had daughters that were never around a man until he came around. They were surprised to hear him say that woman weren't physically near a man athletically. Ie a woman beating a man in a foot race isn't a normal thing. He also has concerns for the other son who she isn't transitioning because he's being ignored since she wants a "girl" so much she just focused on the one.

Let's not also forget she started all of this when the boy was 3 yos. Sick woman.
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9739 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:29 am to
quote:

their logic, this child is mature enough to make life altering decisions involving their body. And if they actually believe that child is mature enough to mutilate their genitals, then they have to also believe that child has the ability to make other decisions concerning their genitalia, up to and including engaging in sexual activity. You cannot believe one without believing the other.


Rational thought

But wouldn’t you know that the groomers always have their “out”. The evil NAZI doctors say, that the transition needs to start taking place before puberty, that’s the only hope for a nice clean transition. I know, it’s as crazy as all their agenda, but that is their argument
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

And let's not forget the mom is a Pediatrician.


Trust the experts?
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS
Member since Mar 2004
73187 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:34 am to
quote:

You should think twice about going to bat for him.


I wish someone would bat you.

Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9739 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:35 am to
quote:

And let's not forget the mom is a Pediatrician.


Didn’t know that. So this whole thing is a twisted experiment. And the son is just a mouse in a maze.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33726 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:38 am to
quote:

The guy obviously did something to lose custody and unsupervised visits. You should think twice about going to bat for him.


So the dad is a pos, everyone should just stand around and watch the mom torture the kid?

That doesnt make any sense, its less about the dad and more about the kid being forced to have a sex change.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15805 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Didn’t know that. So this whole thing is a twisted experiment. And the son is just a mouse in a maze.


I guarantee the mom is a control freak and this is more about her having " her way" instead of the dad. The child is just an object to her winning.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73601 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:46 am to
quote:

But wouldn’t you know that the groomers always have their “out”. The evil NAZI doctors say, that the transition needs to start taking place before puberty, that’s the only hope for a nice clean transition. I know, it’s as crazy as all their agenda, but that is their argument


Yep. And it makes absolutely no sense.
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

By their logic, this child is mature enough to make life altering decisions involving their body. And if they actually believe that child is mature enough to mutilate their genitals, then they have to also believe that child has the ability to make other decisions concerning their genitalia, up to and including engaging in sexual activity. You cannot believe one without believing the other.


Why Democrats and their supporters are evil vile humans. Heck Illinois just made it legal for a minor to have an abortion without telling the parents. Probably opens it up for minors to "transition" without parents knowing too.

We are at a point where political parties in this nation are separating themselves down the good vs evil line. Obviously each think they are on the good side and the other the evil side. Why we are past the point of reconciliation.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:53 am to
quote:

They shopped for the judge to overturn the original 50/50 custody.
Could you provide some details on this? Where did you obtain this information?

To my knowledge, the original divorce proceeding was handled in the 301st District Court, every proceeding in the multi-year history of this dispute has been heard by the 301st District Court, and the 301st District Court retains exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over this dispute to this day. See Tex. Fam. Code §152.202

To what Court was this case "shopped?"
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:59 am to
quote:

I guarantee the mom is a control freak and this is more about her having " her way" instead of the dad.


These crazy women live vicariously thru their children.

Dad may be a POS (or that could be a lie made up by some shitty Lawyer) , but he's trying to stop a child from acting on a whim that will scar him forever.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15805 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:59 am to
Cherry picking so you can have something to argue while again ignoring the main issue.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:02 am to
quote:

As a male, in texas, you don't have to do anything for the court to go along with "mom is in Cali with the kids and she doesn't want them to fly to see dad"
I practiced Family Law in Texas for two decades, and this assertion is nonsense.

In about 90-95% of cases, the possession schedule (which addresses travel in great detail) is simply the Standard Possession Order enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1989. That Order gives the parent who is not the PMC (usu the father) the right to possession on the 1st, 3rd and 5th weekend of every month or (alternatively, and at HIS option) on any one weekend of his choosing.

When the parents live a great distance apart, the father usually selects the second option, and the mother has ZERO option to decline those periods of possession, so long as the father provides the required notices of his selected weekend. I recall only ONE case in which a Court restricted that sort of travel. One, in almost 20 years.

Unfortunately, the father IS usually responsible for the COST of such travel, unless the Court modifies that provision of the SPO. If it was the MOTHER who left the state, I fall into the camp who believe that this is unfair and that the MOTHER should bear the cost of all such travel, if it was HER who initiated the move.

But that is a distinct issue.
This post was edited on 1/4/23 at 11:48 am
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Could you provide some details on this? Where did you obtain this information?


The dad mentioned it in the Michael Berry show interview yesterday. That's how he described it as going.

If I understood it right, the original judge gave them 50/50 custody to help prevent her from transitioning the child. Then her law firm, apparently the largest money donating family firm in TX started working on getting it overturned. Got it in front of a judge that annulled their 5yr marriage, which somehow voided the 50/50 custody. Sounds this was done just in time to take advantage of the new law in CA as sounds like she went there in the first days of it being into affect.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Cherry picking so you can have something to argue while again ignoring the main issue.


Well, it IS a day ending in "Y".

See, in Hank's world, Judges and Lawyers are sacrosanct and infallible.

He will never admit that anyone involved in the Judicial System that has allowed this madness to get as far as it has should be tarred and feathered.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15805 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:05 am to
Aggiehank what is your stance on a 10 year old child having toxic chemicals given to him that will forever alter his life? Forget court bullshite how about the child for once.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:07 am to
Here's the REAL question:

Should any Judge who even ENTERTAINS the notion that a 10 year old child should be REMOTELY eligible to start an irreversible process that will scar them mentally and physically for life be allowed to remain on the bench?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram