- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Son, age 10, on scheduled agenda to eventually be chemically casterated
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:21 am to boxcar willie
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:21 am to boxcar willie
quote:
Fake news. If it sounds made up it probably is. This is just like ya'll dominion machine bull crap.
Thanks for outing yourself as a dumb liberal groomer!!
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:24 am to Revelator
quote:
This is a horrible story, and it’s shocking we’ve degraded so far as a society. Many people no longer have the ability to discern right from wrong.
Just look at the comments from mmcgrath and that boxcar guy and it's easy to see how we have degraded so badly. They have allowed ideology to completely overcome any sense of reason or decency they may have had
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:25 am to mmcgrath
quote:
The guy obviously did something to lose custody and unsupervised visits. You should think twice about going to bat for him.
Maybe, just maybe both parents are trash and the "system" should lookout for the kid.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:28 am to oogabooga68
quote:
The Judge should be removed from office and the Mom should be institutionalized, period.
And that's what the TX govt needs to figure out how to stop these rouge judges like rouge DAs. TX has lost a lot of conservative cred over them ignoring this child sexual transitioning topic. It's been going on too long and ruining lives of their children.
And let's not forget the mom is a Pediatrician. Apparently one of her reasons for moving to LA was due to her practice getting hurt by the "transphobic" group. The dad said he only knows they are in LA county, and suspects she is working at a transition clinic.
In the Berry interview, he goes into detail about her mega-feminist family upbringing. I caught the back end of that segment, so don't know the setup details to stuff I heard but what I did hear sounded crazy. Stuff like his her sister had daughters that were never around a man until he came around. They were surprised to hear him say that woman weren't physically near a man athletically. Ie a woman beating a man in a foot race isn't a normal thing. He also has concerns for the other son who she isn't transitioning because he's being ignored since she wants a "girl" so much she just focused on the one.
Let's not also forget she started all of this when the boy was 3 yos. Sick woman.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:29 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
their logic, this child is mature enough to make life altering decisions involving their body. And if they actually believe that child is mature enough to mutilate their genitals, then they have to also believe that child has the ability to make other decisions concerning their genitalia, up to and including engaging in sexual activity. You cannot believe one without believing the other.
Rational thought
But wouldn’t you know that the groomers always have their “out”. The evil NAZI doctors say, that the transition needs to start taking place before puberty, that’s the only hope for a nice clean transition. I know, it’s as crazy as all their agenda, but that is their argument
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:31 am to KAGTASTIC
quote:
And let's not forget the mom is a Pediatrician.
Trust the experts?
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:34 am to mmcgrath
quote:
You should think twice about going to bat for him.
I wish someone would bat you.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:35 am to KAGTASTIC
quote:
And let's not forget the mom is a Pediatrician.
Didn’t know that. So this whole thing is a twisted experiment. And the son is just a mouse in a maze.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:38 am to mmcgrath
quote:
The guy obviously did something to lose custody and unsupervised visits. You should think twice about going to bat for him.
So the dad is a pos, everyone should just stand around and watch the mom torture the kid?
That doesnt make any sense, its less about the dad and more about the kid being forced to have a sex change.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:38 am to Padme
quote:
Didn’t know that. So this whole thing is a twisted experiment. And the son is just a mouse in a maze.
I guarantee the mom is a control freak and this is more about her having " her way" instead of the dad. The child is just an object to her winning.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:46 am to Padme
quote:
But wouldn’t you know that the groomers always have their “out”. The evil NAZI doctors say, that the transition needs to start taking place before puberty, that’s the only hope for a nice clean transition. I know, it’s as crazy as all their agenda, but that is their argument
Yep. And it makes absolutely no sense.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:47 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
By their logic, this child is mature enough to make life altering decisions involving their body. And if they actually believe that child is mature enough to mutilate their genitals, then they have to also believe that child has the ability to make other decisions concerning their genitalia, up to and including engaging in sexual activity. You cannot believe one without believing the other.
Why Democrats and their supporters are evil vile humans. Heck Illinois just made it legal for a minor to have an abortion without telling the parents. Probably opens it up for minors to "transition" without parents knowing too.
We are at a point where political parties in this nation are separating themselves down the good vs evil line. Obviously each think they are on the good side and the other the evil side. Why we are past the point of reconciliation.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:53 am to KAGTASTIC
quote:Could you provide some details on this? Where did you obtain this information?
They shopped for the judge to overturn the original 50/50 custody.
To my knowledge, the original divorce proceeding was handled in the 301st District Court, every proceeding in the multi-year history of this dispute has been heard by the 301st District Court, and the 301st District Court retains exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over this dispute to this day. See Tex. Fam. Code §152.202
To what Court was this case "shopped?"
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:59 am to SOSFAN
quote:
I guarantee the mom is a control freak and this is more about her having " her way" instead of the dad.
These crazy women live vicariously thru their children.
Dad may be a POS (or that could be a lie made up by some shitty Lawyer) , but he's trying to stop a child from acting on a whim that will scar him forever.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:59 am to AggieHank86
Cherry picking so you can have something to argue while again ignoring the main issue.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:02 am to Bulldogblitz
quote:I practiced Family Law in Texas for two decades, and this assertion is nonsense.
As a male, in texas, you don't have to do anything for the court to go along with "mom is in Cali with the kids and she doesn't want them to fly to see dad"
In about 90-95% of cases, the possession schedule (which addresses travel in great detail) is simply the Standard Possession Order enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1989. That Order gives the parent who is not the PMC (usu the father) the right to possession on the 1st, 3rd and 5th weekend of every month or (alternatively, and at HIS option) on any one weekend of his choosing.
When the parents live a great distance apart, the father usually selects the second option, and the mother has ZERO option to decline those periods of possession, so long as the father provides the required notices of his selected weekend. I recall only ONE case in which a Court restricted that sort of travel. One, in almost 20 years.
Unfortunately, the father IS usually responsible for the COST of such travel, unless the Court modifies that provision of the SPO. If it was the MOTHER who left the state, I fall into the camp who believe that this is unfair and that the MOTHER should bear the cost of all such travel, if it was HER who initiated the move.
But that is a distinct issue.
This post was edited on 1/4/23 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Could you provide some details on this? Where did you obtain this information?
The dad mentioned it in the Michael Berry show interview yesterday. That's how he described it as going.
If I understood it right, the original judge gave them 50/50 custody to help prevent her from transitioning the child. Then her law firm, apparently the largest money donating family firm in TX started working on getting it overturned. Got it in front of a judge that annulled their 5yr marriage, which somehow voided the 50/50 custody. Sounds this was done just in time to take advantage of the new law in CA as sounds like she went there in the first days of it being into affect.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:02 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Cherry picking so you can have something to argue while again ignoring the main issue.
Well, it IS a day ending in "Y".
See, in Hank's world, Judges and Lawyers are sacrosanct and infallible.
He will never admit that anyone involved in the Judicial System that has allowed this madness to get as far as it has should be tarred and feathered.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:05 am to AggieHank86
Aggiehank what is your stance on a 10 year old child having toxic chemicals given to him that will forever alter his life? Forget court bullshite how about the child for once.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:07 am to SOSFAN
Here's the REAL question:
Should any Judge who even ENTERTAINS the notion that a 10 year old child should be REMOTELY eligible to start an irreversible process that will scar them mentally and physically for life be allowed to remain on the bench?
Should any Judge who even ENTERTAINS the notion that a 10 year old child should be REMOTELY eligible to start an irreversible process that will scar them mentally and physically for life be allowed to remain on the bench?
Popular
Back to top


0






