- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some Americans fear violence after multiple reports of "organized retail theft" (ORT)
Posted on 8/30/23 at 7:03 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 8/30/23 at 7:03 am to AggieHank86
quote:
They just raised the level of the divider between misdemeanor and felony to $950. States adjust this figure ALL THE TIME, to reflect inflation.
Did they also create a policy where police offers couldn't try and pursue or detain someone who is stealing less than 950?
Posted on 8/30/23 at 7:04 am to AggieHank86
It had nothing to do with inflation, it regarded social justice initiatives.
Even you are smart enough to understand this, put down the biases and wishcasting..
Even you are smart enough to understand this, put down the biases and wishcasting..
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 7:55 am
Posted on 8/30/23 at 7:07 am to Azkiger
quote:
Did they also create a policy where police offers couldn't try and pursue or detain someone who is stealing less than 950?
Prop 47 was a social justice initiative to get more black and brown people out of the prisons.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 7:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
. States adjust this figure ALL THE TIME, to reflect inflation.
Progressives are so fricking dishonest, or worse...stupid
Posted on 8/30/23 at 8:11 am to Azkiger
quote:
Did they also create a policy where police offers couldn't try and pursue or detain someone who is stealing less than 950?
He'll get back with you in a few hours on this. It takes time to clip and edit mashups from different Leftist websites to form a word salad response to your direct question. This guy is a recycled Chat GPT clown that uses pivot phrases to gaslight away from the actual subject matter.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 8:40 am to Tomatocantender
There is no question I believe the financials must be adjusted due to inflation. I also believe the punishment should be just as severe as originally intended.
I also believe misdemeanor crimes should provide the perp to be placed in stocks on the courthouse lawn. Citizens can then pay a small fee to throw rotten fruit and vegetables at them. At the end of the day, the perp(s) must clean up the courthouse lawn.
Either sever punishment or humiliation!!
I also believe misdemeanor crimes should provide the perp to be placed in stocks on the courthouse lawn. Citizens can then pay a small fee to throw rotten fruit and vegetables at them. At the end of the day, the perp(s) must clean up the courthouse lawn.
Either sever punishment or humiliation!!
Posted on 8/30/23 at 8:44 am to Timeoday
There is a solution to this problem. It is called Constitutional carry. You don't have to fear violence if you are armed and well-trained in the proper use of your weapon.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 8:47 am to Houag80
quote:
Hank, once again simping for criminals
At least he isn’t simping for pedophiles, which is what he usually does on this board
Posted on 8/30/23 at 8:48 am to LRB1967
quote:
There is a solution to this problem. It is called Constitutional carry.
I'm fine with the open door of low level criminals and the abdication of community safety by the government as long as the perps can be punished by the citizenry on the spot.
A few dead thieves will send a broader message than a shoplifter in jail.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 8:49 am
Posted on 8/30/23 at 8:55 am to RogerTheShrubber
What I do not undestand is if this ORT is causing a national retailer that amount of money, why are the retailers not providing additional security to stop it?
Or is it so bad out there economically they need something called ORT to blame it on other than BIDENOMICS!!
Or is it so bad out there economically they need something called ORT to blame it on other than BIDENOMICS!!
Posted on 8/30/23 at 9:00 am to TBoy
quote:
I was in San Francisco over Christmas and one of the dinner gatherings I attended
“dinner gathering” must be code for “gay orgy”. Congrats on the sex, I guess.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 9:05 am to TBoy
quote:
assistant US Attorney in San Fran, who described the connection between the organized shoplifting and the Honduran drug cartel th
you assumed that he was telling you the absolute and complete truth. That's your mistake. He was feeding you propaganda.
Second, if they know who the bad guys are, why are they so very weak that they can't get them and solve the problem?
Posted on 8/30/23 at 9:11 am to Timeoday
quote:
why are the retailers not providing additional security to stop it?
Because of ambulance chasing lawyers and a gullible population.
I don't mind lax laws, but you can't have lax laws and tie the hands of the victim. There are tradeoffs to everything.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I suggest that YOU need to take your own advice, Roger.
It had nothing to do with inflation, it regarded social justice initiatives.
Even you are smart enough to understand this, put down the biases and wishcasting.
When Texas raised the threshold between misdemeanor and felony from $20 to $40 more than a century ago, was it the result of "social justice initiatives?
EVERY state periodically adjusts this threshold upward, and they have been doing so since the time of the Revolution.
Have all of these many hundreds of adjustments arise from "social justice initiatives?" If not, when and where did the motivation suddenly change?
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:06 pm to Houag80
quote:Just out of curiosity, are you capable of discussing policy and/or politics WITHOUT personal attacks? Or is that just beyond your capacity?
Hank, once again simping for criminals.
I am genuinely curious, because I cannot recall EVER reading a substantive post from you.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:07 pm to AggieHank86
What are your clients saying?
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:08 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:Where have I supported the non-enforcement policies?
If you don’t prosecute a crime it makes that criminal act legal for all intents and purposes. Posting a wall of your Marxist text trying to justify it won’t change that fact.
Don't just insist that I've done so at some vague point in the past. Link a post.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:09 pm to Timeoday
There is really nothing to prevent the same overwhelming organized home invasions other than weaponry. If 30 ghetto rats attack your home and you don't have a gun, what could you possibly do? The same goes for strong arming people in vehicles, at private events, etc. We are reaching a new level of insanity that only dead perps can resolve. We need lots and lots of dead perps.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:11 pm to AggieHank86
Ever consider that none of us believe you are a die hard conservative considering you spend hours of your day defending leftist policies and politicians by virtue of playing silly semantics games and obfuscating?
Or that your story is you “retired” from the law in your 50s which doesn’t happen
Or that your story is you “retired” from the law in your 50s which doesn’t happen
Posted on 8/30/23 at 12:13 pm to yakster
quote:The upward revision of the threshold in California was enacted in 2010, LONG before the recent spate of organized retail theft (ORT), my Himalayan friend.
He loves his legal jargon to try and outsmart people. But the plain simple fact is they raised the limits of theft so the hoodrats can steal more and get away with it.
More than half of the states have increased the threshold since California did so, yet only a handful of those states have experienced significant ORT. The problem is something unique to those jurisdictions, NOT the routine nationwide adjustment of the thresholds.
To me, it would appear that the "unique" problem is indeed lack of enforcement, which I have said several times ITT.
Popular
Back to top


3








