Started By
Message

re: Social Security Fairness Act

Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:01 pm to
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9370 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

I just don’t see it that way - you opted out to get a pension job.

Need to study the bill more - feels like this is not fair to the current system though.



Yes you do need to study it more because none of these people potentially affected "opted out" of anything.

They paid in to SS for at least 40 quarters (10 years) from a job that required them to pay SS. Then they got a different job (like working for the state) which has it's own retirement so they don't pay SS while at that job.

So if they held that job for 25 years and retired from their state job then they can only claim the retirement from the state and cannot collect SS even though they paid in their 40 quarters.

Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24839 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Seems like the 3 million government workers shoulda known that their government pension would rule out any social security.


They did but why should you lose a partial benefit just because you paid into two pensions instead of one?

I hope this gets passed. If you have the qualifying time in both systems, you should get the benefits of both systems.
Posted by Trailer Trash
Livingston Parish
Member since Feb 2006
573 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:03 pm to
i did know the rules. If i were in about 42 other states it would not impact me but LA is a state that is impacted. I would be thrilled if they overturn it but I have no control over it. I doubt it comes up for a vote in the senate because Schumers people from his state are not impacted.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24839 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:04 pm to
quote:


I just don’t see it that way - you opted out to get a pension job.


You are forced to switch pension, you do not have an option.

GPO is basically you take your SSN benefit, if it exceeds the other pension say LASERS or TRSL then you get a partial SSN benefit. But, if your other pension is larger than the SSN benefit you get nothing. So you pay into SSN for 20+ years then take a job in gov't and pay into that retirement system for 20 years. The SSN benefit will be less than the other pension, so you get nothing for your investment in SSN.
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 4:06 pm
Posted by FireawayLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2023
1745 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:06 pm to
Back in the day we didn’t HAVE to pay in because we couldn’t receive it. Then I forget when but they changed it to we HAD to pay but still couldn’t receive the benefit. Can you see the problem clearer now?? It’s theft. Making people pay into something they can never receive back because we have a pension. Most people have pensions and yet still receive SS payments. No difference
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135757 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

we HAD to pay but still couldn’t receive the benefit
If that is the case, and if contributions were not transferred to a parallel track, benefits must be awarded IAW contribution
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 4:10 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78275 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Good to know that you approve govt stealing money from your paycheck, then passing a law barring you from ever collecting it, when everyone else gets to file for their money at some point
In LA. if you work 30 years for the state you get 100% of your highest 3 year average salary for the remainder of your life. If you retire at 55 you'll collect for longer than you worked in some cases. Do you know who pays for that? Others who have government collecting money out of their check who will never see those dollars come back.
Posted by KajunLass
Member since Apr 2022
488 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:10 pm to
The spouses of governmental employees are also affected by the penalty, even if the spouse never held a government job.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
4039 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

They wouldn’t be eligible for a pension after only working for the government for a few years.


It takes 10 years to become vested.



Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
8302 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:12 pm to
So I worked 20 years paying into SS. Then I work 26 years as a first responder and paid into a pension system (I ain't getting a pension for free) but you think I'm not entitled to SSI benefits? My pension isn't that much but it offsets the low pay for fire/police. Most first responders work multiple jobs to make ends meet and pay SS on some of those jobs. If I pay in, I should get the benefits I deserve.
Posted by First Sergeant1
Enterprise, Alabama
Member since Dec 2018
928 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:13 pm to
How would this work if you’re retired military?
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9370 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:14 pm to
The other part that people always leave out is that those government employees affected by this pay into the retirement fund.

For Louisiana state jobs its 7.5% of your gross salary if hired before 2006 and its 8% if hired after. So it isn't just free money, the workers are paying into it.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33429 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

n LA. if you work 30 years for the state you get 100% of your highest 3 year average salary for the remainder of your life. If you retire at 55 you'll collect for longer than you worked in some cases. Do you know who pays for that? Others who have government collecting money out of their check who will never see those dollars come back.

Until you come a with a way that doesnt allow the Fed or La. to steal peoples money, and then never offer a way for them to be refunded, then they deserve to be treated like anyone else

My father worked worked while in HS, then in college. Worked a few years before he got a job in La. govt. Worked there until Buddy Roemer laid off a bunch of people. Then returned to govt service. Left again for several years. Returned to govt service until he retired. Then worked again until he died

And all those private employment years SS was allowed to steal from him, and never devised a way for him to get his money back

You gonna pay him back for that? Or just use his money to retire on?
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
8302 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Also think it is absurd that Jeff bezos, bill gates, Warren buffet and Elon can get SS but not me because I have too much $$


Plus every member of Congress. I didn't "opt out" of the private sector. I was laid off and needed to feed my family. I became a first responder and now I've lost 20+ years of SS contributions. But Julio snuck across the Rio Grand and gets handed money.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78275 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Until you come a with a way that doesnt allow the Fed or La. to steal peoples money, and then never offer a way for them to be refunded, then they deserve to be treated like anyone else
I pay tens of thousands in taxes every year I'll never get back. This is nothing new.

quote:

Or just use his money to retire on?
Those dollars were tossed in with my dollars for all sorts of stuff, not just social security.
Posted by hottub
Member since Dec 2012
3652 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:23 pm to
How about we just rid of SS and move on.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9370 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

In LA. if you work 30 years for the state you get 100% of your highest 3 year average salary for the remainder of your life.


Well this is wrong. 30 years is 75% (You get 2.5% per service year).
Posted by done dancing
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2016
219 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:27 pm to
I have a law enforcement pension. I paid social security every year in law enforcement on side jobs. Now I have 20 years in the private sector post retirement paying social security. So I have over 40 years paying social security, the last 20 at a higher rate. Under the current law they will penalize me 60% of the social security I receive because of my pension. If I paid the money and accrued the time why should I not get the full amount
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33429 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Those dollars were tossed in with my dollars for all sorts of stuff, not just social security

Someone doesnt know how SS works
quote:

There are two separate Social Security trust funds, the Old-Age Trust Fund pays retirement benefits

quote:

The Social Security trust fund holds money not needed in the current year to pay benefits and administrative costs and, by law, invest it in special Treasury bonds that are guaranteed by the U.S. Government.

quote:

All of Social Security’s payroll taxes are deposited in the trust funds, and all of Social Security’s benefits and administrative expenses are paid from the trust funds.

Your SS is NOT mixed with SSI funds. Never has been
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78275 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 4:31 pm to
quote:


Well this is wrong. 30 years is 75% (You get 2.5% per service year).
Yep, my mistake.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram