- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So people understand the implications of the Twitter ordeal, this Elon tweet is paramount.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:32 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:32 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Lol his frick you money says bring it the frick on
They chased TRUMP for years, now they added Elon to the list....
You know what, frick the Democratic Party!
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:35 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Who in government was involved in giving orders?
IDK, yet. A lot more to be revealed.
ETA: likely a lot of DOJ and FBI officials given the fact that James Baker moved from the DOJ to Twitter counsel…or was James Baker still employed by the DOJ?
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Feeling a little fear are we Dem robot?
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:57 pm to Taxing Authority
Who in gov in 2020 was responsible? You won’t say IR can’t say?
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:00 pm to jamboybarry
Those guys have got to be at least 90 years old by now! If they’re still alive.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:
IDK, yet. A lot more to be revealed.
Got it.
quote:
ETA: likely a lot of DOJ and FBI officials given the fact that James Baker moved from the DOJ to Twitter counsel…or was James Baker still employed by the DOJ?
Baker was already working for twitter in 2020. He left the FBI in 2018.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:23 pm to Hmerly
quote:
You know there are people thinking up shite to throw at him. He'll get the Trump treatment and probably never get out from under the mountain they'll place over his head
If I were Musk, I would hire a small marine division for security, have a really faithful food tester and stuff a billion dollars under the mattress just in case he is ever cut off from his bank account.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:26 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Did government actually order or threaten penalties against Twitter? Or just make recommendations/requests? That’s an important distinction when it comes to First Amendment.
This isn’t an impressive distinction.
It’s like “did the government tell the hospitals not to use ivermectin? Or did they just make a suggestion?”
Everyone knows what the suggestion from the government means.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:29 pm to GumboPot
The problem I see is that Taibi said it was available to both parties. But the population of Dems inside Twitter made it one sided. And was it the DNC Biden campaign or Specific politicians ? Because that’ll depend on whether Twitter is a government actor as their agent.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:29 pm to the808bass
Was “the government” involved at all? If so, who or what departments?
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Serious question. I keep seeing stuff about government and 1st amendment. Who was in office or working on behalf of the govt and involved in ordering stuff get taken down?
You are so mentally ill. The governing body of the Democratic Party colluded with a private company to violate the 1st amendment of a private citizen. You should be appalled.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Your strategy appears to have been reduced to an insistence on each specific detail or else the entire “package” is completely dismissed. Lame.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:43 pm to ItNeverRains
A political party is not the US Government. A private group requested posts made on a private company’s website be taken down. That has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:45 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Was “the government” involved at all? If so, who or what departments?
Not concerning Twitter we do know Mark Zuckaburg was influenced by the FBI to censor political speech on FB.
Matt also talks about “Team Biden” contacting Twitter to censor political speech. IDK what the legal ramifications of this are.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:49 pm to davyjones
quote:
Your strategy appears to have been reduced to an insistence on each specific detail
That will be the legal standard.
I have a strong suspicion that with more revelations there will be a smoking gun email or text between the DOJ/FBI telling Twitter to censor political speech. These guys were very close.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:54 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I have a strong suspicion that with more revelations there will be a smoking gun email or text between the DOJ/FBI telling Twitter to censor political speech. These guys were very close.
Now that would be a lot bigger of a deal, imo, than what has been seen so far.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:03 pm to Mickey Goldmill
If you ignore the larger context and take into account other instances and examples, which is the appropriate thing to do, then it instantly becomes a big deal.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:05 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Just admit that you are ok with the government suppressing free speech as long as it benefits your team. If the show was on the other foot, you’d be screeching bloody murder
Popular
Back to top


0






