- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So one thing we can all agree on
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:35 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:35 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You don’t risk raiding a former president’s home and finding nothing.
They don’t give a shite. What possible repercussions would they face? The media is on their side and praying that something is found.
This post was edited on 8/8/22 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:36 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
seemingly justify it.
Yikes.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:36 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
These people wipe their arse with the Constitution and will celebrate when it is no longer an obstacle. Which it apparently already isn’t.
There is no accountability. Republicans are soft and afraid of Twitter backlash for having a backbone.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:37 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You don’t risk raiding a former president’s home and finding nothing.
Normally, yes.
Yet they literally spied on his campaign, so...
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:37 pm to boosiebadazz
I suspect Eric. He a simpleton. Can get played easily
This post was edited on 8/8/22 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:37 pm to Douglas Quaid
quote:
It is not outside the realm of possibility that Trump team baited them into this though. Knowing it would be great for ratings with the base.
It’s be hilarious if they rooted thru 16 bankers boxes full of documents and found 20 years of daily menus for Mar-a-lago.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You don’t risk raiding a former president’s home and finding nothing.
Since when have the FBI ever needed evidence to act?
Remember the FISA court ok’ing the spying of Trump based on a made up dossier?!
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
The FBI has someone inside Trumpworld and/or Mar a Lago feeding them intel.
Feeding them intel about what exactly? All the sources are saying this raid is about the classified document issue which has been in the news for months now. Why are they just now raiding his home? What could an informant possibly tell them that they didn't already know?
And this sort of thing has happened many times before. Government employees being lazy with classified documents, taking them home, etc. Almost never is a raid done unless the suspect was intentionally leaking or selling state secrets (or something of that sort). There is no way Trump is involved in something like that.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:39 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
My presidential ballot was blank in 2016 and 2020. Take your tribalism somewhere else.
bullshite
If you leaned any more to the left you’d fricking fall over you pretentious sack of shite
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:39 pm to boosiebadazz
The FBI is rigged and everyone knows it. They threw Hillary under the bus with the Weiner laptop 12 days before the election just to cover their tracks. It's plain as day and everyone can see it. How dumb to they think we are?
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:40 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
No, I’m asking what sort of “not nothing” you are possibly envisioning.
Oh, I don’t know. Breitbart had that article quoting Kash Patel that Trump ordered stuff to be declassified but the paperwork didn’t go through so apparently he just took it because he thought it should be public.
That would present an interesting fact pattern depending on what was in the documents. Apparently trump was out of town and his lawyer was present for the raid so maybe there was some level of cooperation or a head’s up to get the lawyer there.
I really don’t know. It just seems like there is a large piece of information we aren’t privy to.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:Considering it has never been done before, who knows.
You don’t risk raiding a former president’s home and finding nothing.
At the same time, they risked secretly investigating a presidential campaign based off of a dossier about hookers and urine.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:40 pm to AUstar
quote:
Government employees being lazy with classified documents
No reasonable prosecutor...
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:41 pm to boosiebadazz
Well, they cracked his Safe and nothing was in it….lol.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:41 pm to boosiebadazz
What could he have of any value
This seems so pointless
This seems so pointless
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:42 pm to boosiebadazz
My presidential ballot was blank in 2016 and 2020.
ok commie
quote:
Take your pro-american, pro-constitution somewhere else.
ok commie
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:42 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:When did you get redpilled?
Tuscaloosa
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:42 pm to boosiebadazz
They probably saw a provision in the PDA that basically says that if it is determined to have a document or documents then there is some sort of sanction involved. No matter how chickenshit.
So whereas in the past everyone is collegial about it when it comes to Trump no such indulgence.
Plus this is a fishing expedition because this ain't about some docs where the classification is in dispute.
So whereas in the past everyone is collegial about it when it comes to Trump no such indulgence.
Plus this is a fishing expedition because this ain't about some docs where the classification is in dispute.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:43 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Oh, I don’t know. Breitbart had that article quoting Kash Patel that Trump ordered stuff to be declassified but the paperwork didn’t go through so apparently he just took it because he thought it should be public.
That would present an interesting fact pattern depending on what was in the documents. Apparently trump was out of town and his lawyer was present for the raid so maybe there was some level of cooperation or a head’s up to get the lawyer there.
I really don’t know. It just seems like there is a large piece of information we aren’t privy to.
That all seems mighty nebulous for something so unprecedented.
I guess I was sort of hoping you’d imagined something much more concrete and egregious.
Posted on 8/8/22 at 9:43 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
What could he have of any value
Almost anything. He was the president. There’s some degree of plausible deniability between him and the nitty gritty on the ground, but he still had access to a ton of stuff. I think Kash specifically mentioned stuff about Ukraine and maybe one other topic I’m drawing a blank on right now.
Popular
Back to top



0








