- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:46 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:46 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Parents who advocate for their own children to be educated about transgenderism and other paraphilias aren’t groomers. I wouldn’t call them that. I would call them retarded.
2
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
By ALL means, please DO explain the NAP violation inherent in holding a entirely VOLUNTARY story time,
Whats the purpose?
Its manipulation.
Stop supporting the rape and abuse of children just to feel better about your own lifestyle.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:47 am to AggieHank86
quote:..... aaaand once again
By ALL means, please DO explain the NAP violation inherent in holding a entirely VOLUNTARY story time, as to which EACH parent has COMPLETE discretion to attend ... or not.
Because the ONLY position I have advocated (and for which I have been accused of "grooming") is that VOLUNTARY story time is not a problem.
This should be entertaining. I expect 100% deflection, misdirection and moving of goal posts.
..... what would you suppose accounts for the explosion of novel gender dysphoria within our elementary schools?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:48 am to the808bass
quote:
I would call them retarded.
They would rather their children be dysfunctional that for the other adult progs to call them "intolerant."
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:49 am to squid_hunt
quote:i suggest that you read that line of posts again, because "defamation" was not included in it. As I recall, there were three posts, going something like the following:
Defamatory in standard English is a legal term. Try again.
Ooga
Libertarians are saying it is "not OK" to call someone a groomer.
Kaiju
What libertarians said that?
Hank
Any libertarian who was raised with any manners.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:49 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Churches should volunteer to do Library reading to kids in full biblical costumes, watch the trannies scream and protest.
If I was given the liberty, I could take over a second grade class and convert 5-7 kids to any religion I chose over the course of a year.
Is that ok? It’s not.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:49 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
.. what would you suppose accounts for the explosion of novel gender dysphoria within our elementary schools?
We went from 1% to 15% after 4th wave feminism was introduced.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:49 am to NC_Tigah
I strongly disagree with Hank on his romanticism of the drag story time thing, but I don't think he's actually supportive of trans indoctrination in schools (hopefully)
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:50 am to the808bass
quote:
If I was given the liberty, I could take over a second grade class and convert 5-7 kids to any religion I chose over the course of a year.
Yep.
Get to them while they are young, that's the idea.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:51 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:As long as attendance is entirely voluntary, I would have exactly ZERO opposition to that.
Churches should volunteer to do Library reading to kids in full biblical costumes
A dozen of you will now call me a "liar," because consistent beliefs baffle the frick out of you.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:52 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We went from 1% to 15% after 4th wave feminism was introduced.
And we will get the standard progressive defense.
“That’s not actually happening.”
“Here’s the data.”
“That’s not a good source.”
“Here’s more data gathered over years by sources that you trust.”
“Yeah. It’s actually a good thing that half the kids are trannies now.”
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:52 am to AggieHank86
quote:
i suggest that you read that line of posts again, because "defamation" was not included in it. As I recall, there were three posts, going something like the following:
It was quite literally included in the included quote from YOU
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:53 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I strongly disagree with Hank on his romanticism of the drag story time thing, but I don't think he's actually supportive of trans indoctrination in schools (hopefully)
Hank has a personal investment in this issue.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:54 am to AggieHank86
quote:
God forbid that people become COMFORTABLE in the presence of people unlike themselves.
You want desperately to be above the fray, but this is simply a more wordy way of implying that people who disagree with you are intolerant.
In other words, you're just a Leftist calling anyone who disagrees with you "racist" or "homophobe".
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:55 am to Pettifogger
quote:"Supportive" is a fluid term. e.g., Contrarianism (even for the sake of contrarianism) against parental pragmatism in the case of boys in girls bathrooms is supportive of trans indoctrination in schools.
I don't think he's actually supportive of trans indoctrination in schools (hopefully)
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:56 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Please define this term, because it is not something recognized by any medical organization with which I am familiar.
once again, what would you suppose accounts for the explosion of novel gender dysphoria within our elementary schools?
I will assume you are referencing the number of kids who are now "identifying" as transgender. It is kids being kids. Monkey see, monkey do. Almost all of them will outgrow it. Maher said it pretty well. To paraphrase, the kid dressing-up like a cowboy is not likely to end up working on a ranch as an adult and the kid dressing like an astronaut is not like to be going to Mars.
Before you start with "but you want to cut their genitals," no I do not. I oppose ANY surgical or hormonal transition for pre-pubescent children.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:56 am to AggieHank86
quote:
And you come across as someone who is not well-versed in Standard American English.
Perhaps his overbearing English Teacher Mother didn't "beat it into him"....your words.
You grew up a "Teacher's Kid".....
That explains a lot about you.
Nothing worse than the kid of a Preacher or a Teacher.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:58 am to the808bass
quote:
Hank has a personal investment in this issue.
He seems to. Trannyism is his Kryptonite.
Its impossible to deny the youth push in this movement. He can pretend its for whatever reason he chooses.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:58 am to squid_hunt
quote:What are you babbling about?
You have also openly opposed the Florida Bill.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:58 am to squid_hunt
quote:
but I absolutely believe that Democrats are opening the door to sex with children deliberately.
That's kind of a wacky belief, man You're letting your disdain for democrats get the better of you.
I don't think you truly believe that, if you take away your political POV.
Page 7 of 26
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News