- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:29 am to squid_hunt
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:29 am to squid_hunt
quote:
but Hank is throwing out words like defamatory to stifle the conversation
Those people hate to be judged for what they are.
0
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:31 am to the808bass
quote:So ... referring to groomers as "groomers" is actually not defamatory? Hmmmm. I'm relieved.
people who are advocating for kids to be educated about deviant sexual behavior and identities for the purposes of normalizing those behaviors and identifies.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:31 am to the808bass
quote:
than the Left’s usage of the “racism” label.
They change racism from the actual definition to simply mean "of the majority."
They aren't bleeding hearts. These are evil people
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:32 am to keltonAve
quote:The term MEANS "an effot to RECRUIT someone (here, a child) into another's lifestyle," though it is not entirely clear what "lifestyle" concerns these folks at the moment. Homosexuality? Transgenderism? Drag Performances? I don't suppose it really matters, since the reactionaries see all of these three distinct categories as being one.
How broad is your definition of "groomer"? That's the potential problem.
In any case, the reactionaries are trying REALLY hard to CHANGE that definition to "an effort to make others COMFORTABLE with another's lifestyle."
God forbid that people become COMFORTABLE in the presence of people unlike themselves.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:33 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In any case, the reactionaries are trying REALLY hard to CHANGE that definition to "an effort to make others COMFORTABLE with another's lifestyle."
Wrong. You have a horrid victim complex.
Grooming is trying to recruit. Trannies are doing this with children, objectively.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
Hank can't think of any scenarios where it's probably not the greatest idea to have children become comfortable with certain people. 
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
though it is not entirely clear what "lifestyle" concerns these folks at the moment.
Sure.
quote:
"an effort to make others COMFORTABLE with another's lifestyle."
How far do you pretend the camel has backed into the tent? We can all see it. We know what it is. You're a liar and no one here believes your pretended motives.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:37 am to RogerTheShrubber
Personally I don't care if groomers are trying to groom for sexual exploitation or because they're broken and need the affirmation from young children that they're not pariahs. Both are evil, and if we need to expand the definition a bit, well, there is a lot of that going on, yeah?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:37 am to squid_hunt
quote:And you come across as someone who is not well-versed in Standard American English.
Any libertarian with an ounce of decorum is for limiting speech? You give off a real Baron Harkonnen vibe, Hank. You know that, right?
Saying that it is "not OK" to use defamatory words toward another (decorum) is a LONG WAY from thinking that it is "OK" to utilize the coercive power of government to ENFORCE good manners.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:37 am to pankReb
quote:
Hank can't think of any scenarios where it's probably not the greatest idea to have children become comfortable with certain people
Its grooming if you are trying to change someone's belief.
Churches should volunteer to do Library reading to kids in full biblical costumes, watch the trannies scream and protest.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:When have you encountered significant homophobia in prepubescent kids? When have you come across reports of such cases?
God forbid that people become COMFORTABLE in the presence of people unlike themselves.
With that out of the way, once again, what would you suppose accounts for the explosion of novel gender dysphoria within our elementary schools?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Saying that it is "not OK" to use defamatory words toward another (decorum) is a LONG WAY from thinking that it is "OK" to utilize the coercive power of government to ENFORCE good manners.
Defamatory in standard English is a legal term. Try again.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:and yakked about by weaselly pieces of shite paralegals when their ox is gored
So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...
Racist is used as a weapon, so can Groomer.
Both are childish AND defamatory.
Yes, they should be treated similarly.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:40 am to redneck hippie
quote:
You honestly believe that all democrats are child molesters? or are ok with it? is that your stance?
Silence is acceptance. YES.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:41 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Personally I don't care if groomers are trying to groom for sexual exploitation or because they're broken and need the affirmation from young children that they're not pariahs
I agree with you. I don't want kids around these damaged people.
If your lifestyle is so repugnant you need children for validation, you don't deserve any respect.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:41 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:By ALL means, please DO explain the NAP violation inherent in holding a entirely VOLUNTARY story time, as to which EACH parent has COMPLETE discretion to attend ... or not.
The NAP covers grooming, he ignores that.
Because the ONLY position I have advocated (and for which I have been accused of "grooming") is that VOLUNTARY story time is not a problem.
This should be entertaining. I expect 100% deflection, misdirection and moving of goal posts.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:42 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Because the ONLY position I have advocated is that VOLUNTARY story time is not a problem.
You have also openly opposed the Florida Bill.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:44 am to AggieHank86
What's been interesting to watch has been the folks complaining about parents being "groomers."
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:44 am to squid_hunt
quote:
How far do you pretend the camel has backed into the tent? We can all see it. We know what it is. You're a liar and no one here believes your pretended motives.
Ricky Martin has a "lifestyle"....sounds like Hank sees nothing wrong with him trying to get his nephew to be more comfortable with
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:45 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
What's been interesting to watch has been the folks complaining about parents being "groomers."
I mean, groomers probably isn't the correct term. But disparaging parents who take their kids to watch strippers parade around because the parents want Instagram likes for being progressive is well warranted and I'm not going to get too hung up on whether the terminology we use to insult them is fair.
Page 6 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News