Started By
Message

Smithsonian’s Museum of American History Erases American Greatness, New Report Finds

Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4208 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:28 pm
Smithsonian’s Museum of American History Erases American Greatness, New Report Finds



-----------------------------------------------------------
As a result, the report claims, the museum now “purposely presents America as a problematic country irredeemably conceived, founded by deeply flawed men, and still operating today as an instrument of systemic racism and oppression. In the Museum’s current telling, the country is, above all, defined by white supremacy, slavery, conquest, exclusion, hierarchy, racism, xenophobia, misogyny, and systemic injustice.”

Five Key Findings
The report made five key findings.



1. NMAH Fails to Substantively Present America’s Founders and Founding

For example, a “visitor to the Museum today will find no major exhibit dedicated to America’s Founding era, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, other Founding Fathers, the Continental Congress, the Pilgrims, the Puritans, or major moments of the American Revolution, such as Washington’s crossing of the Delaware.

However, you will find Benjamin Franklin, chiefly because of his anti-slavery efforts.

2. NMAH Has ‘Problematized’ the 250th Anniversary of America’s Founding

The report documents how museum leadership stated that the 250th anniversary should be “problematized.” For “Critical Social Justice” theorists, this refers to the process of highlighting alleged “oppressions” within a given subject to “deconstruct, disqualify, and discredit the prevailing narrative on that subject.”


freestar
For NMAH, this means American history should be reframed away from an “America First mentality” and an “Anglo-centric” focus on its founding, including highlighting the “gaps” in the Declaration of Independence rather than its unprecedented affirmation of mankind’s unalienable rights.

3. NMAH Removed ‘American History’ From Its Mission Statement to ‘Get Out of the ‘America First’ Mentality‘

Removing the “America First mentality” included replacing “American history” and “infinite richness” in the museum’s mission statement with language about empowering people to create “a more just and compassionate future” by exploring “the complexity of our past.”

4. NMAH Has Abandoned Historical Scholarship for Political Activism



The report notes that the museum’s interpretive plan directs staff to, “whatever the topic,” tie exhibits back to a set of seven “core issues of our time”—specifically, race/identity, gender/sexuality, climate change, immigration/migrations, economic inequality, technological change, and nationalism/globalism—as part of its “commitment to relevance.”

This means reshaping, in a woke manner, any subject, be it democracy, entertainment, immigration, childhood, women’s labor, sports, or early American settlement. This is why visitors would see LGBTQ-centric displays alongside R2-D2 and Dorothy’s ruby slippers.

5. The Smithsonian Has Not Met Its Obligations to the American People

The report concludes that “the Smithsonian Institution, and the National Museum of American History in particular, under its current leadership and current interpretive ideology, cannot be trusted to tell America’s story honestly and in a way that is inspiring, unifying, and worthy of our great republic.”

LINK
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
61723 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:34 pm to
The Smithsonian? This is my surprised face.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
14370 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:37 pm to
This is what happens when you let DEI hires run a museum…
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52399 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:38 pm to
I'm certain the three astronauts on Apollo 13 would never have made it home if not for three Luby's cafeteria employees.
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
34246 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:39 pm to
If it receives taxpayer money, it should be immediately cut.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
15451 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:40 pm to
Yes. Liberals, like those running the museum, hate this country and dismiss it as iredeemably "racist," with no history to be proud of.
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
8548 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

If it receives taxpayer money, it should be immediately cut


If only Congress had any balls.....
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
17231 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:50 pm to
Exhile them all!
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11760 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

If only Congress had any balls.....


Nost of Congress supports this shite.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19732 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

If it receives taxpayer money, it should be immediately cut.


Will never happen, unfortunately. Congress created it and funds it. Beneath Congress, the chain of authority is:

Board of Regents: Appoints the Smithsonian Secretary. The Secretary appoints museum directors, including the NMAH director. (Hartig is the NMAH director).

The Board does not vote on or "hire" new directors. That is left to the Secretary. However, the Secretary is voted on by the board.

Skorton is the secretary of the Smithsonian. He (and his internal people) appointed Hartig director of NMAH. The Board appointed Skorton in 2014. Here is who was on the board in 2014:

John G. Roberts Jr. — Chief Justice of the United States (Chancellor of the Smithsonian)
Joe Biden — Vice President of the United States

Members of Congress:

Sen. John Boozman (R–Arkansas)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D–Vermont)
Sen. David Perdue (R–Georgia)
Rep. Xavier Becerra (D–California)
Rep. Tom Cole (R–Oklahoma)
Rep. Sam Johnson (R–Texas)

Citizen Regents:

John W. McCarter Jr. (Chair)
Shirley Ann Jackson (Vice Chair)
Barbara M. Barrett -- Republican who served under Bush
Steve Case
John Fahey
Robert P. Kogod
Risa J. Lavizzo-Mourey
Michael M. Lynton
David M. Rubenstein - Democrat guy

They do not publicize their votes. They internally "deliberate" and make a decision as a group. So we have no idea who voted what. All I can say is Chief Justice Roberts, 4 Republican Congressmen, and at least 1 Republican citizen regent let this social justice agenda proceed.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27256 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:14 pm to
Time to fire a bunch commies, wokesters, their hangers-on and their useful idiots.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140537 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Smithsonian’s Museum of American History Erases American Greatness, New Report Finds
Clean house! Fire anyone responsible. The mission should be to have Americans leaving the museum more hopeful, not hateful, hollow, or hurting. That doesn't mean avoiding the bad stuff. It means emphasizing our collective triumph over it.

E.g., Slavery was horrible. But for those whose ancestors were slaves, the alternate universe in which there had been no slave trade would have them inevitably living in much worse circumstances in ancestral lands than is currently the case in their American home, for all its warts. For every African American, there is an African who would give his I-teeth to swap spots, and swap opportunities. Don't forgive our past; don't forget it; but do not forget the good that we presently have either.

Following the slavery exhibit, simply focus positively on the differential here vs there today, and various achievements of Black Americans in the interim. Complimentary. Positive. Confident. Hopeful. America is exceptional. This is what YOU can do. This is what WE can do as Americans together in our land of opportunity.

That is what the NMAH should be about. That is the public service it should serve.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 2:23 pm
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28795 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Board of Regents: Appoints the Smithsonian Secretary. The Secretary appoints museum directors, including the NMAH director. (Hartig is the NMAH director).



Who appoints the Board of Regents? For what term?

Who actually owns the building and physical artifacts? Is it a Smithsonian Foundation or is it the actual taxpayers who fund it all? If it's the taxpayers then their self-serving, self-declared rules mean nothing.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140537 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Who appoints the Board of Regents? For what term?
The Board consists of 17 members:

• The Vice President of the United States (serves ex officio).
• The Chief Justice of the United States (serves ex officio).
• Three members of the U.S. Senate, appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate (typically based on recommendations from Senate leadership).
• Three members of the U.S. House of Representatives, appointed by the Speaker of the House.
• Nine citizen Regents, who are jointly appointed by a joint resolution of Congress and signed into law by the President.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19732 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:33 pm to
Here is what ChatGPT said on how it works:

quote:

1. Ex officio Regents (automatic)

These are on the Board because they hold a particular office:

Vice President of the United States
Chief Justice of the United States

No one appoints them to the Board separately—they serve automatically while holding those offices.

2. Congressional Regents

There are:

3 U.S. Senators
3 U.S. Representatives

They are appointed by the leadership of Congress, not elected by the full House or Senate.

Typically:

The President pro tempore of the Senate appoints the Senate Regents (usually on the recommendation of Senate leadership). The Speaker of the House appoints the House Regents.

3. Citizen Regents

There are 9 citizen Regents.

The citizen Regents are:

Nominated by the Smithsonian Board of Regents (through its governance/nominating process). Appointed by Congress through a joint resolution (passed by both the House and Senate). Signed into law by the President (or otherwise become law).

So, although the Board recommends the candidates, they do not simply appoint themselves. Congress must approve the citizen Regents by passing legislation, and the President signs it.


In 2014, there were 5 Republicans on the board, but the 9 citizen regents (who's votes count equally) were overwhelmingly Democrats. Most of them very rich Democrats (several billionaires).
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
10475 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Following the slavery exhibit, simply focus positively on the differential here vs there today, and various achievements of Black Americans in the interim. Complimentary. Positive. Confident.


If they do that, people might start getting the idea that we don’t need the Fundamental Change that is Marxism.

And that’s what all of this insane bullshite has ever been about at its root core: Emphasizing what a “failure” the American Republic has been in order to “save it” and replace it with a Marxist state.

Frick these Leftists radicals and frick the wobbly-kneed establishment GOP-types who turn a blind eye in hopes they’ll never make anyone on the Left too mad at them.
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3925 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:02 pm to
We need MAGA administrations for the next 50 years at least to root out the festering sores of far left communist bureaucrats imbedded into every government and academic organization in the USA ….. they have to die off and be replaced by MAGA patriots…….
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
61723 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Exhile them all!


You meanin’ we arta exhale ‘em or exile ‘em?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66500 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

The report documents how museum leadership stated that the 250th anniversary should be “problematized.” For “Critical Social Justice” theorists, this refers to the process of highlighting alleged “oppressions” within a given subject to “deconstruct, disqualify, and discredit the prevailing narrative on that subject.”
Marxist drivel. Fire everyone and unashamedly restore the old exhibits.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116523 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:38 pm to
Cut off it's funding.

Completely.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram