- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Smithsonian’s Museum of American History Erases American Greatness, New Report Finds
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:28 pm
Smithsonian’s Museum of American History Erases American Greatness, New Report Finds
-----------------------------------------------------------
As a result, the report claims, the museum now “purposely presents America as a problematic country irredeemably conceived, founded by deeply flawed men, and still operating today as an instrument of systemic racism and oppression. In the Museum’s current telling, the country is, above all, defined by white supremacy, slavery, conquest, exclusion, hierarchy, racism, xenophobia, misogyny, and systemic injustice.”
Five Key Findings
The report made five key findings.
1. NMAH Fails to Substantively Present America’s Founders and Founding
For example, a “visitor to the Museum today will find no major exhibit dedicated to America’s Founding era, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, other Founding Fathers, the Continental Congress, the Pilgrims, the Puritans, or major moments of the American Revolution, such as Washington’s crossing of the Delaware.
However, you will find Benjamin Franklin, chiefly because of his anti-slavery efforts.
2. NMAH Has ‘Problematized’ the 250th Anniversary of America’s Founding
The report documents how museum leadership stated that the 250th anniversary should be “problematized.” For “Critical Social Justice” theorists, this refers to the process of highlighting alleged “oppressions” within a given subject to “deconstruct, disqualify, and discredit the prevailing narrative on that subject.”
freestar
For NMAH, this means American history should be reframed away from an “America First mentality” and an “Anglo-centric” focus on its founding, including highlighting the “gaps” in the Declaration of Independence rather than its unprecedented affirmation of mankind’s unalienable rights.
3. NMAH Removed ‘American History’ From Its Mission Statement to ‘Get Out of the ‘America First’ Mentality‘
Removing the “America First mentality” included replacing “American history” and “infinite richness” in the museum’s mission statement with language about empowering people to create “a more just and compassionate future” by exploring “the complexity of our past.”
4. NMAH Has Abandoned Historical Scholarship for Political Activism
The report notes that the museum’s interpretive plan directs staff to, “whatever the topic,” tie exhibits back to a set of seven “core issues of our time”—specifically, race/identity, gender/sexuality, climate change, immigration/migrations, economic inequality, technological change, and nationalism/globalism—as part of its “commitment to relevance.”
This means reshaping, in a woke manner, any subject, be it democracy, entertainment, immigration, childhood, women’s labor, sports, or early American settlement. This is why visitors would see LGBTQ-centric displays alongside R2-D2 and Dorothy’s ruby slippers.
5. The Smithsonian Has Not Met Its Obligations to the American People
The report concludes that “the Smithsonian Institution, and the National Museum of American History in particular, under its current leadership and current interpretive ideology, cannot be trusted to tell America’s story honestly and in a way that is inspiring, unifying, and worthy of our great republic.”
LINK
-----------------------------------------------------------
As a result, the report claims, the museum now “purposely presents America as a problematic country irredeemably conceived, founded by deeply flawed men, and still operating today as an instrument of systemic racism and oppression. In the Museum’s current telling, the country is, above all, defined by white supremacy, slavery, conquest, exclusion, hierarchy, racism, xenophobia, misogyny, and systemic injustice.”
Five Key Findings
The report made five key findings.
1. NMAH Fails to Substantively Present America’s Founders and Founding
For example, a “visitor to the Museum today will find no major exhibit dedicated to America’s Founding era, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, other Founding Fathers, the Continental Congress, the Pilgrims, the Puritans, or major moments of the American Revolution, such as Washington’s crossing of the Delaware.
However, you will find Benjamin Franklin, chiefly because of his anti-slavery efforts.
2. NMAH Has ‘Problematized’ the 250th Anniversary of America’s Founding
The report documents how museum leadership stated that the 250th anniversary should be “problematized.” For “Critical Social Justice” theorists, this refers to the process of highlighting alleged “oppressions” within a given subject to “deconstruct, disqualify, and discredit the prevailing narrative on that subject.”
freestar
For NMAH, this means American history should be reframed away from an “America First mentality” and an “Anglo-centric” focus on its founding, including highlighting the “gaps” in the Declaration of Independence rather than its unprecedented affirmation of mankind’s unalienable rights.
3. NMAH Removed ‘American History’ From Its Mission Statement to ‘Get Out of the ‘America First’ Mentality‘
Removing the “America First mentality” included replacing “American history” and “infinite richness” in the museum’s mission statement with language about empowering people to create “a more just and compassionate future” by exploring “the complexity of our past.”
4. NMAH Has Abandoned Historical Scholarship for Political Activism
The report notes that the museum’s interpretive plan directs staff to, “whatever the topic,” tie exhibits back to a set of seven “core issues of our time”—specifically, race/identity, gender/sexuality, climate change, immigration/migrations, economic inequality, technological change, and nationalism/globalism—as part of its “commitment to relevance.”
This means reshaping, in a woke manner, any subject, be it democracy, entertainment, immigration, childhood, women’s labor, sports, or early American settlement. This is why visitors would see LGBTQ-centric displays alongside R2-D2 and Dorothy’s ruby slippers.
5. The Smithsonian Has Not Met Its Obligations to the American People
The report concludes that “the Smithsonian Institution, and the National Museum of American History in particular, under its current leadership and current interpretive ideology, cannot be trusted to tell America’s story honestly and in a way that is inspiring, unifying, and worthy of our great republic.”
LINK
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:34 pm to djmed
The Smithsonian? This is my surprised face.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:37 pm to djmed
This is what happens when you let DEI hires run a museum…
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:38 pm to High C
I'm certain the three astronauts on Apollo 13 would never have made it home if not for three Luby's cafeteria employees.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:39 pm to djmed
If it receives taxpayer money, it should be immediately cut.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:40 pm to djmed
Yes. Liberals, like those running the museum, hate this country and dismiss it as iredeemably "racist," with no history to be proud of.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:45 pm to dkreller
quote:
If it receives taxpayer money, it should be immediately cut
If only Congress had any balls.....
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:52 pm to dakarx
quote:
If only Congress had any balls.....
Nost of Congress supports this shite.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:10 pm to dkreller
quote:
If it receives taxpayer money, it should be immediately cut.
Will never happen, unfortunately. Congress created it and funds it. Beneath Congress, the chain of authority is:
Board of Regents: Appoints the Smithsonian Secretary. The Secretary appoints museum directors, including the NMAH director. (Hartig is the NMAH director).
The Board does not vote on or "hire" new directors. That is left to the Secretary. However, the Secretary is voted on by the board.
Skorton is the secretary of the Smithsonian. He (and his internal people) appointed Hartig director of NMAH. The Board appointed Skorton in 2014. Here is who was on the board in 2014:
John G. Roberts Jr. — Chief Justice of the United States (Chancellor of the Smithsonian)
Joe Biden — Vice President of the United States
Members of Congress:
Sen. John Boozman (R–Arkansas)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D–Vermont)
Sen. David Perdue (R–Georgia)
Rep. Xavier Becerra (D–California)
Rep. Tom Cole (R–Oklahoma)
Rep. Sam Johnson (R–Texas)
Citizen Regents:
John W. McCarter Jr. (Chair)
Shirley Ann Jackson (Vice Chair)
Barbara M. Barrett -- Republican who served under Bush
Steve Case
John Fahey
Robert P. Kogod
Risa J. Lavizzo-Mourey
Michael M. Lynton
David M. Rubenstein - Democrat guy
They do not publicize their votes. They internally "deliberate" and make a decision as a group. So we have no idea who voted what. All I can say is Chief Justice Roberts, 4 Republican Congressmen, and at least 1 Republican citizen regent let this social justice agenda proceed.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:14 pm to djmed
Time to fire a bunch commies, wokesters, their hangers-on and their useful idiots.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:20 pm to djmed
quote:Clean house! Fire anyone responsible. The mission should be to have Americans leaving the museum more hopeful, not hateful, hollow, or hurting. That doesn't mean avoiding the bad stuff. It means emphasizing our collective triumph over it.
Smithsonian’s Museum of American History Erases American Greatness, New Report Finds
E.g., Slavery was horrible. But for those whose ancestors were slaves, the alternate universe in which there had been no slave trade would have them inevitably living in much worse circumstances in ancestral lands than is currently the case in their American home, for all its warts. For every African American, there is an African who would give his I-teeth to swap spots, and swap opportunities. Don't forgive our past; don't forget it; but do not forget the good that we presently have either.
Following the slavery exhibit, simply focus positively on the differential here vs there today, and various achievements of Black Americans in the interim. Complimentary. Positive. Confident. Hopeful. America is exceptional. This is what YOU can do. This is what WE can do as Americans together in our land of opportunity.
That is what the NMAH should be about. That is the public service it should serve.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:24 pm to AUstar
quote:
Board of Regents: Appoints the Smithsonian Secretary. The Secretary appoints museum directors, including the NMAH director. (Hartig is the NMAH director).
Who appoints the Board of Regents? For what term?
Who actually owns the building and physical artifacts? Is it a Smithsonian Foundation or is it the actual taxpayers who fund it all? If it's the taxpayers then their self-serving, self-declared rules mean nothing.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:28 pm to shinerfan
quote:The Board consists of 17 members:
Who appoints the Board of Regents? For what term?
• The Vice President of the United States (serves ex officio).
• The Chief Justice of the United States (serves ex officio).
• Three members of the U.S. Senate, appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate (typically based on recommendations from Senate leadership).
• Three members of the U.S. House of Representatives, appointed by the Speaker of the House.
• Nine citizen Regents, who are jointly appointed by a joint resolution of Congress and signed into law by the President.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:33 pm to shinerfan
Here is what ChatGPT said on how it works:
In 2014, there were 5 Republicans on the board, but the 9 citizen regents (who's votes count equally) were overwhelmingly Democrats. Most of them very rich Democrats (several billionaires).
quote:
1. Ex officio Regents (automatic)
These are on the Board because they hold a particular office:
Vice President of the United States
Chief Justice of the United States
No one appoints them to the Board separately—they serve automatically while holding those offices.
2. Congressional Regents
There are:
3 U.S. Senators
3 U.S. Representatives
They are appointed by the leadership of Congress, not elected by the full House or Senate.
Typically:
The President pro tempore of the Senate appoints the Senate Regents (usually on the recommendation of Senate leadership). The Speaker of the House appoints the House Regents.
3. Citizen Regents
There are 9 citizen Regents.
The citizen Regents are:
Nominated by the Smithsonian Board of Regents (through its governance/nominating process). Appointed by Congress through a joint resolution (passed by both the House and Senate). Signed into law by the President (or otherwise become law).
So, although the Board recommends the candidates, they do not simply appoint themselves. Congress must approve the citizen Regents by passing legislation, and the President signs it.
In 2014, there were 5 Republicans on the board, but the 9 citizen regents (who's votes count equally) were overwhelmingly Democrats. Most of them very rich Democrats (several billionaires).
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:36 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Following the slavery exhibit, simply focus positively on the differential here vs there today, and various achievements of Black Americans in the interim. Complimentary. Positive. Confident.
If they do that, people might start getting the idea that we don’t need the Fundamental Change that is Marxism.
And that’s what all of this insane bullshite has ever been about at its root core: Emphasizing what a “failure” the American Republic has been in order to “save it” and replace it with a Marxist state.
Frick these Leftists radicals and frick the wobbly-kneed establishment GOP-types who turn a blind eye in hopes they’ll never make anyone on the Left too mad at them.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:02 pm to djmed
We need MAGA administrations for the next 50 years at least to root out the festering sores of far left communist bureaucrats imbedded into every government and academic organization in the USA ….. they have to die off and be replaced by MAGA patriots…….
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:28 pm to LSUbest
quote:
Exhile them all!
You meanin’ we arta exhale ‘em or exile ‘em?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:31 pm to djmed
quote:Marxist drivel. Fire everyone and unashamedly restore the old exhibits.
The report documents how museum leadership stated that the 250th anniversary should be “problematized.” For “Critical Social Justice” theorists, this refers to the process of highlighting alleged “oppressions” within a given subject to “deconstruct, disqualify, and discredit the prevailing narrative on that subject.”
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:38 pm to djmed
Cut off it's funding.
Completely.
Completely.
Popular
Back to top

13











