Started By
Message

re: Six arrested in R.I. on charges of child sex trafficking after sting operation

Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:40 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

I wonder why he is so invested in downplaying child sex trafficking l.


A summary is posted in this thread

quote:

The terminology has changed. People who want to give government more power always change the definition of words to achieve that goal.


"Sex trafficking" is a shift in the way LEO/Police State actors focus certain efforts due to the War on Drugs changing (decriminalization and legalization efforts becoming popular). It's a way to justify their power and ability to project civil asset forfeitures.

I've written about this for like 10+ years on here.

I made a thread in 2015 about this article specifically (It's lost to time).

quote:

Such articles offered a breathless sense that the drug trade was booming, irresistible to criminals, and in desperate need of child foot soldiers. Lawmakers touted harsher penalties for drug offenses. The war on drugs raged. New task forces were created. Civilians were trained how to "spot" drug traffickers in the wild, and students instructed how to rat out drug-using parents. Politicians spoke of a drug "epidemic" overtaking America, its urgency obviously grounds for anything we could throw its way.

We know now how that all worked out.

The tactics employed to "get tough" on drugs ended up entangling millions in the criminal justice system, sanctioning increasingly intrusive and violent policing practices, worsening tensions between law enforcement and marginalized communities, and degrading the constitutional rights of all Americans. Yet even as the drug war's failures and costs become more apparent, the Land of the Free is enthusiastically repeating the same mistakes when it comes to sex trafficking. This new "epidemic" inspires the same panicked rhetoric and punitive policies the war on drugs did—often for activity that's every bit as victimless.

Forcing others into sex or any sort of labor is abhorrent, and it deserves to be treated like the serious violation it is. But the activity now targeted under anti-trafficking efforts includes everything from offering or soliciting paid sex, to living with a sex worker, to running a classified advertising website.

What's more, these new laws aren't organic responses by legislators in the face of an uptick in human trafficking activity or inadequate current statutes. They are in large part the result of a decades-long anti-prostitution crusade from Christian "abolitionists" and anti-sex feminists, pushed along by officials who know a good political opportunity when they see it and by media that never met a moral panic they didn't like.

The fire is fueled by federal money, which sends police departments and activist groups into a grant-grubbing frenzy. The anti-trafficking movement is "just one big federal grant program," Michael Hudson, a scholar with the conservative Hudson Institute, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "Everybody is more worried about where they're going to get their next grant" than helping victims, Hudson said.


quote:

It makes you wonder if he is involved, one way or another

Shut the frick up.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Also no one was charged with trafficking in this story so the OP and title are misleading.

Literally proving my overall point about the boogeyman status of "trafficking"
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:41 am to
quote:

He really worships consolidated power structures, especially oppressive ones.

The irony
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260956 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Does it happen here? Sure. Is it common? No
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20288 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Shut the frick up.


I must have gotten close to the truth since it touched a nerve, kid diddler
This post was edited on 4/15/24 at 8:48 am
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18304 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Proving my point that the term is being used to situations that don't involve actual trafficking in any way.


I have no issues with sting operations taking sick pedo's off the street before they can harm an innocent child. A buddy of mine works a task force in MS. I don't know how he does it. The shite he sees is unimageable to most people. Most of these people deserve a lead injection to the brain.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Touched a nerve,

No. Just trying to end the lies once and for all

quote:

kid diddler

But you apparently prefer to lie, which is sad considering the subject.

You'd rather use the subject of child sex trafficking to lie about people
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260956 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:48 am to
quote:


Literally proving my overall point about the boogeyman status of "trafficking"


Youre way more triggered by it than anyone else.

Amazing
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I have no issues with sting operations taking sick pedo's off the street before they can harm an innocent child.

Well this board isn't really the place to have a discussion about the issues with these stings, so for the sake of the population here (and its intelligence level), I'll agree.

Given that, it's still not trafficking.

You can't traffic a child that doesn't exist.

quote:

A buddy of mine works a task force in MS. I don't know how he does it. The shite he sees is unimageable to most people. Most of these people deserve a lead injection to the brain.

Again, yes, these crimes are terrible. It's still not "trafficking".
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12970 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:53 am to
quote:

I have no issues with sting operations taking sick pedo's off the street before they can harm an innocent child. A buddy of mine works a task force in MS. I don't know how he does it. The shite he sees is unimageable to most people. Most of these people deserve a lead injection to the brain


See, you just don’t understand. According to SFP, none of these sickos would ever solicit a real child. It’s all the fault of the sting operation. These were just fine upstanding people tricked into soliciting minors.
This post was edited on 4/15/24 at 8:53 am
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18304 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Literally proving my overall point about the boogeyman status of "trafficking"


Thousands of kids are victims of sex trafficking and exploitation every year. The only boogeyman are the MF'rs doing it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:54 am to
quote:

According to SFP, none of these sickos would ever solicit a real child. I

Never said this.

quote:

It’s all the fault of the sting operation.

Fault? Where did I say fault?

quote:

These were just fine upstanding people tricked into soliciting minors.

Again, never said this.

Are you trying to avoid the embarrassment of posting a "gotcha" thread about trafficking that didn't involve trafficking? Proving my larger point about the mis-use of the term to trigger useful idiots like yourself?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260956 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:55 am to
quote:


I have no issues with sting operations taking sick pedo's off the street before they can harm an innocent child.


Traffickers primarily target young women close to legal age. I would bet most street walkers and escorts are trafficked these days.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Thousands of kids are victims of sex trafficking and exploitation every year.

This thread is a gotcha about only trafficking.

quote:

The only boogeyman are the MF'rs doing it.

They are evil, but not the only ones. Evil statists using manufactured threats to increase the state's power against citizens are also evil.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:56 am to
quote:

I would bet most street walkers and escorts are trafficked these days.

Based on the changed definition of "Trafficking" you are correct.

This was not considered "human trafficking" until about 10-ish years ago, when they started to change the definitions of words.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260956 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:



Based on the changed definition of "Trafficking" you are correct.



This isnt a changed definition, its always been the definition.

Youre arguing semantics. Its ridiculous.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36765 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:57 am to
TIL this board ,for all the sky screaming it does, can't define trafficking. Which is pretty funny to watch, the crazier part is once someone defines trafficking for them they start saying he supports the crime, in direct conflict with his posts.

Republicans really went downhill once they let the lame brain maga movement in.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

This isnt a changed definition, its always been the definition.

Read the article I posted last past.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18304 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Evil statists using manufactured threats to increase the state's power against citizens are also evil.


I don't disagree with you on this point. The alphabet squad are the worst.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422893 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

TIL this board ,for all the sky screaming it does, can't define trafficking.

It's because they are the useful idiots whose emotional reaction is the reason why this is occurring.

This is exactly why the Police State is expanding the definition, to get emotional reactions. Idiots gripped with fear give up their rights and permit government authority to expand over them. This is a "govern me harder, daddy" scenario.

quote:

the crazier part is once someone defines trafficking for them they start saying he supports the crime, in direct conflict with his posts.

Because all they have is lies, in the end.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram