- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Since women have the sole right to decide whether to abort or deliver a baby
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:54 am
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:54 am
Men should not be held financially responsible to support the child.
One of the main reasons women argue for abortion is for economic reasons
A man should be able to file an abortion document after the woman becomes pregnant if he decides he doesn't want the baby.
One of the main reasons women argue for abortion is for economic reasons
A man should be able to file an abortion document after the woman becomes pregnant if he decides he doesn't want the baby.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:56 am to Loserman
quote:
A man should be able to file an abortion document after the woman becomes pregnant if he decides he doesn't want the baby.
Don't know about men forcing abortions, but they should be able to sign a TPR.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:59 am to Loserman
So, to recap.
If a man wants to keep the baby, he has no choice.
If a man does not want to support the baby, he has no choice.
The more you learn about "privilege" (male, white) the more you realize that those accused of it, are the ones who are actually getting fricked in this NEW WORLD ORDER.
Was George Orwell from the future?
If a man wants to keep the baby, he has no choice.
If a man does not want to support the baby, he has no choice.
The more you learn about "privilege" (male, white) the more you realize that those accused of it, are the ones who are actually getting fricked in this NEW WORLD ORDER.
Was George Orwell from the future?
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:59 am to Loserman
Why aren't we allowed to take back our semen? It's not theirs per se, we only conditionally lent it to them.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:59 am to Loserman
quote:
Loserman
Hey wear a jimmy hat
Profit
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:00 am to Balloon Huffer
Don't sign the birth certificate and you aren't responsible for the child (at least in Ga that's the case)
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:01 am to Loserman
quote:
A man should be able to file an abortion document after the woman becomes pregnant if he decides he doesn't want the baby
This would raise some sticky situations in rape cases.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:03 am to anc
quote:
A man should be able to file an abortion document after the woman becomes pregnant if he decides he doesn't want the baby.
quote:
Don't know about men forcing abortions, but they should be able to sign a TPR.
He isn't forcing one. He is just filing a legal document that claims he has terminated his part and claim to the bundle of cells.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:05 am to Loserman
quote:
He isn't forcing one. He is just filing a legal document that claims he has terminated his part and claim to the bundle of cells.
And that's fricking stupid; the guy is a pussy.
It's simple; you make a baby, take care of it.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:13 am to Wtodd
quote:
It's simple; you make a baby, take care of it.
Then outlaw abortions for women and cut off government support for single moms.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:13 am to Wtodd
quote:
And that's fricking stupid; the guy is a pussy. It's simple; you make a baby, take care of it.
Nope he didn't make a baby.
The lefties tell us it isn't a baby until the woman magically decided it is a baby and decides not to abort it.
Her body her decision and all
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:16 am to Loserman
quote:
Men should not be held financially responsible to support the child.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:17 am to Wtodd
quote:
It's simple; you make a baby, take care of it.
Unless you’re a female
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:17 am to Loserman
So if a woman doesn't want to kill her baby, but the guy doesn't want to own responsibility for what he played 50% a part of making, he should be absolved of his responsibility?
That's fricking stupid. You have sex, you have the chance of procreating. Freeze your jizz and get a vasectomy. Then you have 100% control over whether you impregnate someone.
It's called responsibility.
That's fricking stupid. You have sex, you have the chance of procreating. Freeze your jizz and get a vasectomy. Then you have 100% control over whether you impregnate someone.
It's called responsibility.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:19 am to Loserman
quote:I’m sorry. Call the cops.
The lefties tell us it isn't a baby until the woman magically decided it is a baby and decides not to abort it.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:21 am to Loserman
One immoral action should not be met with another one.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:22 am to Ollieoxenfree99
quote:
So if a woman doesn't want to kill her baby, but the guy doesn't want to own responsibility for what he played 50% a part of making, he should be absolved of his responsibility?
I mean.... the flip side is acceptable. Why isn’t this version?
quote:
It's called responsibility.
Why do you hold males responsible for sex but not females? Perfectly acceptable for the chick to back out of the responsiblity. It’s only fair that the dude to have the same opportunity.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 10:24 am to beerJeep
Bc the man's life is not disrupted in any way, while a woman has to carry it for 9 months.
ETA: I don't have a dog out n this fight. I hate kids and dont want any. Just saying it is very easy to say it's and equal situation bc both made the child, but it is not.
ETA: I don't have a dog out n this fight. I hate kids and dont want any. Just saying it is very easy to say it's and equal situation bc both made the child, but it is not.
This post was edited on 11/1/18 at 10:26 am
Popular
Back to top

19








