2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SFPLCs buddy spills the beans on Lawfare
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:11 pm to CleverUserName
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:11 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Who cares about the later slap on the wrist "prosecutions"
By a few of the definitions ITT, those would be "lawfare", mind you.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Slowparsingpro
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:12 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
we can move on to General Michael Flynn.
Flynn was prosecuted by Trump's DOJ
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
For a guy that has nearly a half a million posts, you sure do claim you never posted anything.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
By a few of the definitions ITT, those would be "lawfare", mind you.
You going to keep deflecting?
cmon.. let's get in the weeds with Peter Strzok and his position with the investigation along with his texts. Hell... Lisa page too.
Or we can move on to Mike Flynn. Whichever you wanna do.
Does any of that meet the definition I gave?
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think it's exclusive
Her wording was exclusive.
quote:
Trump just has a lot of people in his orbit who are bad at following the law, including multiple lawyers
Or, the law is being applied unevenly. See Trumps 30-whatever felony convictions.
quote:
Nothing organically. It's what specific members of his admin do that involves allegations of breaking the law.
So because there are allegations of breaking the law, we need to go after them even harder so we make sure young people think twice before joining?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you watch the video?
You're disputing what she clearly said, with the quoted language
Yes. She clearly stated ,"So that's what I'm saying. I want to look at these signature cases and just focus on the President, but on the people who enabled him. I want young people coming out of school to say, 'Should I go work for the Trump Administration? Like, that sounds fun, might get an opportunity.' I want them to be like, 'Lord, that might be an opportunity to get myself a ton of problems that I don't want, so let me avoid participating.' I want that deterrence message sent."
By saying, "I want that deterrence message sent", she is issuing a threat to potential Admin employees. She does not say "don't break the law". Oh no, she wants blanket deterrence from even working for the Admin.
Obviously you are ok with that.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:24 pm to CleverUserName
Imma give all of you something to look up. The meaning of The Second Amendment. Comrade Slotkin needs a reminder.
If these Commies hit the streets and Data Republican actually knows what shes talking about, Its going to be time to teach them all the meaning.
If these Commies hit the streets and Data Republican actually knows what shes talking about, Its going to be time to teach them all the meaning.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Flynn was prosecuted by Trump's DOJ
I'm sorry..... did the entire DOJ turn over when Trump was elected? The FBI agents who railroaded him? From the same bureau as Peter Strzok? And when did the initial interviews start? Trumps AG dropped the idiotic case too didn't he?
What happened later with the civil suit? What was the basis of that suit? What did it bring to light?
Third time... does any of this meet the definition I gave?
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Interesting question. When should the "innocent until proven guilty" be prosecuted?
If people broke the law, should they be prosecuted?
If people broke the law, how is that determination made in advance of verdict?
In Lawfare, it is made SELECTIVELY based on politics, religion, or immutable characteristics.
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
-- Lavrentiy Beria
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:29 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
Here comes his chance to drag the conversation about what both sides know is happening into semantics and contrarian douchebaggery, while not ever really saying anything of substance in the process, so he doesn’t get his teeth kicked down his throat when this circles back around next week.
It’s a pretty good gig if you can get it
SOB must get paid per post as much crap as he flings around every day.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:32 pm to tiggerfan02 2021
He intentionally tries to derail every thread he enters. He has no backbone and gets off thinking he's smarter than everyone. It's sad yet comical at this point.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:36 pm to tiggerfan02 2021
quote:
SOB must get paid per post as much crap as he flings around every day.
It's literally every...single...fu?%$ng...day with this guy. ...and he's been doing the exact same shi! for years.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:38 pm to Cromulent
Derail a thread mentioning him and where the rabid macaques are slinging their poo at him?
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:40 pm to Cromulent
quote:Nah. He intentionally take the counterpoint. Counterpoints encourage discussion, and tend to recenter echochamber stuff
He intentionally tries to derail every thread he enters
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News