Started By
Message

re: Senior DoJ Investigator Confirms Bill Clinton Raped Children on Epstein's Plane

Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:28 am to
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50090 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:28 am to
I predict that Slick Willie won't fare too well with his deposition today. His brain has noticeably slowed down, and imo he no longer has the ability to BS his way thru it like Hillary apparently did yesterday.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91563 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:28 am to
We have to call it out.

We have to be buttoned up if anything is ever going to change. It doesn’t matter what anyone calls us.



We need to be good examples for people side eyeing MAGA. It’s the corner to be in, we just need to be better. Stop calling 17 year old runaways, children. ICE needs to stop yeeting people over curbs. Either arrest them or leave them alone. Etc.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167597 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:28 am to
Ain't nothing gonna happen to sick Willie and you know it.

There is a credible news article an actual FBI file in the Epstein files that Virginia said that Hillary was a witness to her being raped So Hillary Met Jeffrey Epstein. So Hilary lied and she flied her broom back to her New York mansion...

William Jeffy will probably plead the 5th
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12044 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Stop calling 17 year old runaways, children.


I notice how you people like to throw out the number 17 as your example for these girls, despite them being as young as 14. You're pushing that age to the closest possible number to legal you can because you have an agenda and it's obvious. Yes, you are trying to make excuses for predators.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:35 am to
I'd counter with:

- Portraying Epstein as a true child predator/pedophile leads people to shrug their shoulders at the actual evidence. It provides no valuable purpose to pretend he was something he isn't. You can acknowledge he probably wasn't a pedo while still maintaining - accurately - that he was a criminal, evil guy who groomed and raped young women.

- Likewise for randoms that O'Keefe gets to "confirm" something.
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
5327 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Tick tock, Billy Boy. Good luck on your deposition today.


Be careful of what you ask for. Where will the line be drawn on investigations and indictments if you start with Bill Clinton? It could open the door for others. There is a lot of smoke around Trump since he is frequently mentioned in the files and is known to hang out with Epstein. He may not be guilty of anything but there will be a lot of pressure to investigate him if others that are included in the files are investigated and indicted. It will be a precarious tightrope to walk.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12044 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Portraying Epstein as a true child predator/pedophile leads people to shrug their shoulders at the actual evidence.


Only people like yourself. Most people in the real world still rightly acknowledge that a 14 year old girl is still a child. And that having sex with a 14 year old child is a heinous crime. It is rape. It is predatory. It is repulsive.

The only people who shrug their shoulders at this shite are some of you fricking weirdos on the internet. In the real world it is reprehensible.

You're throwing your hat in the ring with a guy who is about one step away from saying, "who gives a frick. They're just runaways." Which is essentially saying, "they were abused at home so they may as well be abused by wealthy politicians and businessmen. frick em."
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91563 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:39 am to
quote:

I notice how you people like to throw out the number 17 as your example for these girls, despite them being as young as 14. You're pushing that age to the closest possible number to legal you can because you have an agenda and it's obvious. Yes, you are trying to make excuses for predators.
Not trying to make excuses.

Using 17 isn’t as nefarious as you’re making it out to be. From what I’ve seen and heard and just using logic, I’m just assuming they’re close as shite to 17.

Anyone traveling with a 14 year old for bad reasons should be skinned alive.
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5399 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:39 am to
quote:

never issued a single retraction for publishing falsified information

Sorry but you really think a lack of retractions means you never posted bullshite?

There are thousands of websites or youtube channels out there that post complete bullshite and they never retract shite
Posted by The1TrueTiger
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Member since Apr 2009
2677 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:41 am to
A Senior DoJ Investigator who has been instructed to make a false statement to help validate Trumps Epstine distraction, look at the Clintons not at the fat orange bafoon. 100 percent positive that if put under oath that so-called Investigator would change his tune real quick.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12044 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:41 am to
He mentions 20-30 victims. Some of them were as young as 14. Yes. They're still children at that age.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:41 am to
Nah

You're the equivalent of bored women who watch kidnapping datelines to get a little thrill. Except you do it with stories involving abuse of minors and other tragedies. You're a hobbyist, not a serious person who wants to talk about serious things and you should be treated as such by serious adults.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89832 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Raped Children



quote:

Jeffrey Epstein having sex with underage victims



Aren't the same.


Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12044 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:42 am to
quote:

You're the equivalent of bored women who watch kidnapping datelines to get a little thrill. Except you do it with stories involving abuse of minors and other tragedies. You're a hobbyist, not a serious person who wants to talk about serious things and you should be treated as such by serious adults.


Orwell would be proud.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:43 am to
Anyone grooming a 16 or 17 year old should be too. But these people spend their days making Sound of Freedom fanfic instead of talking about the evidence and what it means.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:44 am to
Let's not pretend you've read Orwell.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 9:45 am
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89832 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Right. Most people with any common sense realize this, but I still see folks running around saying there is no evidence of any of this sh




You haven't shown any evidence of pedophilia or forceable rape of children.







Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89832 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Anyone grooming a 16 or 17 year old should be too. But these people spend their days making Sound of Freedom fanfic instead of talking about the evidence and what it means.




16 is the age of consent in Canada.


Why not just arrest every Canadian for pedophilia?



You can say the abuse of VG was wrong, but you can't call it pedophilia or child rape. It's not.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 9:46 am
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12044 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:45 am to
right, right.

I just said, "to most actual people, raping a 14 year old is a serious and heinous crime, not something to shrug your shoulders at."

To which you replied, "nah."

You're a frickin creep, man.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117599 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Underage and children is not the same thing

Criminal defense lawyers say that a 'child' is anyone under age 25.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram