- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Senate Votes 62-37 to Advance Bill That Would Protect Same-Sex Marriage
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:38 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:38 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
FFS
“If the world hates you, remember that it hated me first. The world would love you as one of its own if you belonged to it, but you are no longer part of the world. I chose you to come out of the world, so it hates you."
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:41 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Bill That Would Protect Same-Sex Marriage
how much "hidden" gun control and money to Ukraine is in this bill that is supposed to protect gays?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:42 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Same-Sex Marriage
No such thing.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:44 pm to Jjdoc
Good
What’s the problem? You can’t strike down something because of a slippery slope. They deserve to be just as miserable as the rest of us
What’s the problem? You can’t strike down something because of a slippery slope. They deserve to be just as miserable as the rest of us
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:50 pm to Jjdoc
May God forgive them for supporting such a thing.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:51 pm to Jjdoc
It would be funny if this virtue signal backfires and opens up a Supreme Court challenge on the issue
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:54 pm to TankBoys32
quote:
Why is this even a priority right now?
Dude, do you not Roe V Wade?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:02 pm to The Boat
quote:
It would be funny if this virtue signal backfires and opens up a Supreme Court challenge on the issue
That would be a waste of time.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:03 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:THIS! Move on.
Exactly. Doesn't harm a soul. Worry about something else. This train has left the station.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:07 pm to Jjdoc
A marriage is between a man and a woman.
America abided by this when it was a real country, and a country genuinely worth fighting for. Before it became a borderless, lawless land of freakazoid perverts and degenerate scum.
I used to laugh at that goofball Ayatollah in Iran when he called America the 'Great Satan.' Damned if he didn't turn out to be right in the long run.
America abided by this when it was a real country, and a country genuinely worth fighting for. Before it became a borderless, lawless land of freakazoid perverts and degenerate scum.
I used to laugh at that goofball Ayatollah in Iran when he called America the 'Great Satan.' Damned if he didn't turn out to be right in the long run.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:09 pm to CountryVolFan
quote:
The Slippery Slope argument is a fallacy and there is no way this will ever lead to genital mutilation of children and drag queen grooming.
Agreed, this should have stopped with traditional marriage, you know, polygamy.
We started down this slope once we started with monogamy.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:23 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Government shouldnt be involved in marriage at all, gay or straight
It has to be at some level, if for nothing else, providing a baseline in property division in divorces. Also important when dealing with paternity by virtue of marriage. Without establishing parameters of what is legally a marriage, it would cause a lot of issues with that. And with a divorce rate sitting at 50%, it affects a lot of people.
And that doesn’t even address the multitude of issues that go along with being legally married like social security, pension beneficiaries, dying intestate, insurance, etc.
You want to completely remove marriage from the mean old law books, you’re not going to like all the other inherent consequences for that. This is a modern society, it’s necessary.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:33 pm to MMauler
quote:
Talk about meaningless f*cking virtue signaling.
Justice Thomas showed you exactly why this isn’t meaningless in his ruling explanation on the Roe decision.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:33 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
And divorce attorneys are celebrating their a** off.
Not enough of them to tilt the meter. I’m a divorce attorney. Gay marriage has been protected since what 2012. I’ve had exactly two gay divorce cases (I practice in Nashville metro). Most gay marriages are short term (they have an extremely high divorce rate) and most of the time kids aren’t involved. So they’re pretty easy to get done quickly. Sure there are outliers but there aren’t enough gay people, then gay people who get married, then gay people who get divorced to make a big difference in a divorce attorney’s bottom line. Not in my state at least.
TBH, I’ve had more cases where one of the spouses comes out of the closet than a gay couple getting divorced.
Gays also generally go to gay attorneys for their divorces. Pee Wee Herman’s sister is actually a divorce attorney here and a big gay rights activist. (She’s a lesbian). She’s also not good at her job and cheap AF
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:59 pm to Jjdoc
frick them.
Count on these same assholes to vote for the abortion rights legislation.
Count on these same assholes to vote for the abortion rights legislation.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:04 pm to Jjdoc
Same sex marriage makes no sense, except for the health insurance benefit for the partner....
It is a money grab, and we all pay for it eventually.
It is a money grab, and we all pay for it eventually.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:39 pm to RAB
quote:
Bona fide ministers in some states no longer have the authority to marry people.
Can you provide a link to this happening? I’m not saying I don’t believe you, but actually, that’s exactly what I’m saying.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:43 pm to Jjdoc
Why are they doing this? Because they are worried that Obergefell will be overturned?
If Obergefell is overturned, then the “constitutional protection” will be vacated, which means that the matter returns TO THE STATES.
If the SCOTUS overturns Obergefell, then they would certainly overturn this new law on the basis of the 10th Amendment.
If Obergefell is overturned, then the “constitutional protection” will be vacated, which means that the matter returns TO THE STATES.
If the SCOTUS overturns Obergefell, then they would certainly overturn this new law on the basis of the 10th Amendment.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:04 pm to Aeolian Vocalion
quote:
A marriage is between a man and a woman.
Not according to the bible
Popular
Back to top


0










