- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS (9-0): You can now own firearms and weed without reprecussions...
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:34 am to finchmeister08
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:34 am to finchmeister08
I cant stand Hunter but I'm ok with the ruling.
0
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:41 am to finchmeister08
Hell yeah.
I love to smoke a little weed while sitting in the deer stand
I love to smoke a little weed while sitting in the deer stand
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:46 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This supports my point that the law doesn't actually prevent felons
Just because it doesn't prevent it doesn't mean the law shouldn't exist, though.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:48 am to stout
It looks like you are agreeing that it basically exists to beef up sentencing. If you aren't, then what's the point of the law?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:49 am to stout
quote:
The only rights the Constitution sees as inalienable rights are defined as you have heard 1000 times, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” and the Government can still take away your liberty with due process.
That's why you forfeit your rights when taking these rights of others. People tend to forget this. You take a life? Your forfeit yours.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:51 am to Smeg
quote:
I mean, it would be ridiculous to say "anyone who drinks any alcohol ever should not be allowed to own a firearm", right?
Right? That statement is so reasonable...yet, heads will explode over this shite.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:53 am to 4cubbies
No. You are fabricating my agreement based on your desire for me to stop humiliating you in this thread.
Laws exist as deterents. Just because certain segments of society don't follow the law doesn't mean laws shouldn't exist.
If the law were some absurd law, as you read about, like the law in Alabama that says it is a crime to wear a fake mustache in church that causes laughter, then that is obviously unreasonable and should no longer be on the books.
There is nothing absurd about a law that seeks to restrict violent felons from possessing a gun.
The point of the law is in the interest of public safety, like all laws. It is in the general public's best interest to make it difficult for a violent felon to obtain a firearm.
Laws exist as deterents. Just because certain segments of society don't follow the law doesn't mean laws shouldn't exist.
If the law were some absurd law, as you read about, like the law in Alabama that says it is a crime to wear a fake mustache in church that causes laughter, then that is obviously unreasonable and should no longer be on the books.
There is nothing absurd about a law that seeks to restrict violent felons from possessing a gun.
The point of the law is in the interest of public safety, like all laws. It is in the general public's best interest to make it difficult for a violent felon to obtain a firearm.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 11:55 am
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:58 am to stout
quote:
You are fabricating my agreement based on your desire for me to stop humiliating you in this thread.
Is that what's happening? quote:This law applies only to that "certain segment of society," though.
Laws exist as deterents. Just because certain segments of society don't follow the law doesn't mean laws shouldn't exist.
quote:I didn't call anything absurd.
There is nothing absurd about a law that seeks to restrict violent felons from possessing a gun.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:02 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
This law applies only to that "certain segment of society," though.
Tell us how they became that certain segment of society
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:06 pm to finchmeister08
"shall not be infringed"
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:07 pm to stout
You maxed out your argument.
You did good for longer than you normally do. Kudos.
You did good for longer than you normally do. Kudos.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:11 pm to finchmeister08
"dual citizen" - this is where our nation is making a grave mistake / thread
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:17 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you think there should be any restrictions on the 2A?
I think age restrictions and restrictions on violent offenders are reasonable. Other than that, not really.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:22 pm to shinerfan
quote:
And it seems hard to separate gun rights from voting rights when it comes to restoration after a felony conviction.
There is no Constitutional right to vote.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:23 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You maxed out your argument.
Thanks for throwing in the towel
It was clear you were backed into a corner and talking in circles
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:27 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
This supports my point that the law doesn't actually prevent felons from being in possession of firearms and serves primarily as a sentencing tool.
Correct but that's not an argument in your favor.
Criminals don't obey laws by definition. However, felony possession of a firearm laws guarantee that when the criminal breaks the law and is prosecuted, he is removed from society for a much longer time.
Laws aren't solely intended to prevent crime; they are also used to remove offenders from society.,
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:38 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You maxed out your argument.
That is incredibly rich coming from you
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:41 pm to stout
quote:
How about a crack addict, because the same law the SC just overturned was used against Hunter Biden for being a crackhead while possessing a firearm.
Nope. Hunter was charge with lying on purchase application.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:47 pm to dalefla
quote:
Nope. Hunter was charge with lying on purchase application.
You should read on before replying. I already covered this
There were three charges for Hunter. Lying on the federal form was one of the 3 but the law the SC struck down today was one of the laws used to charge him
The 3rd charge was lying to a federally licensed gun dealer
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News