- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:24 pm to UptownJoeBrown
I love the ability to judge shop.
Makes it easier to identify the judges Aggie and company adore.
Makes it easier to identify the judges Aggie and company adore.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:24 pm to Narax
quote:as a general rule, the judicial branch attempts to “maintain the status quo“ pending an evidentiary hearing on the questions presented
It's not just the rulings, it's the refusal to stay orders that they know will be challenged.
What’s that means, for the layman, is that a district court will almost always stay implementation of something new, when the legality of that new thing has been challenged, provided that the other standards of a TRO have been met.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:30 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
the existing system WORKS, so long as everyone is participating in good faith.
And therein lies the problem, which you conveniently ignore. They are not participating in good faith, they are being actively partisan/political and using their judicial authority to subvert Executive powers clearly granted in the Constitution.
These jackleg lawyers are forum shopping to file these injunctions with leftist hack judges who they know are going to rule against Trump even though he clearly is within his Constitutional boundaries in running the Executive branch.
You know it just like everybody else knows it, you just want to play the contrarian.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:36 pm to tiggerfan02 2021
quote:if multiple different venues are available, it would constitute utter incompetence not to file the suit in the most favorable of those venues.
These jackleg lawyers are forum shopping to file these injunctions
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:38 pm to AggieHank86
How do you know which is favorable to your proggy cause?
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:40 pm to VOR
quote:
I can’t say he’s wrong about Trump.
Trump literally is an anti-constitutionalist.
Nice shiny hook
Can you give us one example in Trump 2.0 where he ignored the constitution..
- you have to participate in this part of the discussion or I will request that you be banned from this site for speading lies against the POTUS, your other option is to edit what you typed, and then apoligize!!!...
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:41 pm to tiggerfan02 2021
"Participating in good faith" is the cracked pillar of communism.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
so long as everyone is participating in good faith.
There ya go! Smartest thing you've ever said in this site! Marxist that hate America who have attained positions of power by Soros and progressive NGO's are most definitely NOT participating in good faith.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:45 pm to Jbird
Democracy is at risk Chuck with these liberal judges trying to stop executive orders.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:45 pm to Jbird
quote:
You are truly an idiot.
Most narcissists are. They also don’t possess common sense. It’s a shame, thinking they are smarter than everyone else but they aren’t even on the same level.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:46 pm to Jbird
quote:
he thinks judges should just listen to him
No, he thinks judges should stay in their lane and not go into his.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:48 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
These jackleg lawyers are forum shopping to file these injunctions
if multiple different venues are available, it would constitute utter incompetence not to file the suit in the most favorable of those venues.
I see you didn't refute a single thing I said, because you know it is all true.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:50 pm to VOR
quote:
Trump literally is an anti-constitutionalist.
A lot of people here have become angry and anti-constitutional as well.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:52 pm to Jbird
TRUMP and his team are not mad, they are determined. They are not lawless, they are enforcing the existing law.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:54 pm to oldskule
quote:
TRUMP and his team are not mad, they are determined. They are not lawless, they are enforcing the existing law.
This kind of rhetoric does not get Teslas vandalized and prog rallies filled.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:54 pm to Jbird
quote:could you dispense with the childishness, just for a few minutes? If you seriously cannot recognize that my politics are generally right of center, you are too far off the right edge of the spectrum to ever even see the center.quote:How do you know which is favorable to your proggy cause?
if multiple different venues are available, it would constitute utter incompetence not to file the suit in the most favorable of those venues.
Every judge on the planet has leanings. Maybe they lean towards plaintiffs over civil defendants. Maybe they leaned towards the prosecution over criminal defendant. maybe you’ve seen enough of their constitutional opinions to know whether they are a textualist, an originalist, or a living document aficionado.
and if the lawyer is competent, he takes it into account when deciding where to file his lawsuit.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:55 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:FFS
Marxist that hate America who have attained positions of power by Soros and progressive NGO's are most definitely NOT participating in good faith.
they disagree with you. And with me, for what it’s worth. That doesn’t mean they are operating in bad faith.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:56 pm to AggieHank86
Actually it does
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:57 pm to AggieHank86
Childliness? You play smarmy smarter than the average bear for days and want to call that out?
How can a judge be read as proggy or conservative if the are applying the law equally and acting in good faith?
How can a judge be read as proggy or conservative if the are applying the law equally and acting in good faith?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News